Serious Assaults Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of Wounds

A

In R v Waters wounds is defined in the breaking of the skin and the flowing of blood either externally or internally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the legislation behind Wounding with intent to Injure

A

Section 188 CA 1961
Wounding with intent,
Subsection (1) everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who, with intent to cause GBH to any one, Wounds, Maims,disfigures, or causes GBH to any person
Subsection (2) Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who with intent to injure anyone, or with reckless disregard for the safety of others, wounds, maims, disfigures or causes GBH to any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is way to prove intent

A

Intent can be inferred from the Circumstances R v Collister

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a another way to prove intent

A

the court held that in R v Taisalika that the nature of the blow and the gash which it produced on the complainants head would point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

GBH?

A

Harm that is really serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does disfigurement mean

A

Disfigure means to deform or to deface, the disfigurement need not be permanent R V Rapana and Murray.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Doctrine of Transferred malice

A

It is not necessary when the person suffering the harm was the intended victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Actual bodily harm

A

may be internal or external and it need not be permanent, in R v Donovan it was held that it can include any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or the comfort of the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Recklessness

A

Acting recklessly involves consciously and deliberately take an unjustifiable risk. In R v HARNEY it was held that it mean that the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk.
The defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk (subjective test)
That the risk was one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they where known to the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aggravated wounded definition under legislation

A

(1) Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who with intent.
(a) To commit or facilitate the commission or any imprisonable offence ( gona do shit) or
(b) to avoid the detection or himself or any other person in the commission of a imprisonable offence (doing shit) or
(c) to avoid the arrest or facilitate the flight of himself or of any other person upon the commission or attempted commission of any imprisonable offence.

Wounds, maims, disfigures or causes GBH to any person or stupifies or renders unconscious any person, or by any violent means renders any person incapable of resistance.

(2) Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who with any such intent as foresaid, injures any person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What must also be held with aggravated wounding

A

In addition to A B or C being present intent must also be proved, or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it. R V Tihi the second half will be proved by r v Taisalika.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stupefy

A

Means to induce a state of stupor IE make stupid, groggy or insensible: to dull the senses or faculties. in R v Sturm it was held it means to cause an effect on the mind or nervious system of a person, which really seriously interfers with that persons mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the definition of Wounds

A

IN R v Waters it was held that a wound is the break in the skin and the flowing of blood is either externally or internally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Definition of Injures

A

Means to cause actual bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define the term Recklessness

A

Involves consciously and deliberately taking an unjustifiable risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the two case laws for serious assault regarding intent

A

R v Taisalik: The nature of the blos and gash which is produced on the complainant’s head would point to the suggestion to the presence of the necessary intent
q v Colister: Intent can be inferred from the circumstances

17
Q

What is gonna do shit

A

Section 191(1)(a) To commit or Facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence.

18
Q

What is doing shit

A

Section 191(1)(b) To avoid detection of himself or of any other person in the commission of any imprisonable offence

19
Q

What is done shit

A

Section 191(1)(c) to avoid the arrest or facilitate the flight of himself or of any other person upon the commission of any imprisonable offence

20
Q

In a criminal law context there are two specific types of intention in an offence, what are they

A

Deliberate Act: Intent means that act or ommission must be done deliberately. The act or omission must be more than involuntary or accidental.

Intent to produce a result: Is an intent to produce a specific result

21
Q

What is r v collister

A

Intent can be inferred from the circumstances

22
Q

What is r v taisalika

A

The nature of the blow and the gash which It produced on the complainant’s head would poi t strongly to the presence of the neccassry intent.

23
Q

What is dpp v smith

A

Bodily harm needs no explanation and grevious means no more and no less then really serious

24
Q

R v waters

A

Wound involves the breaking of the skin in the flowing of the blood either externally or internally

25
Q

R v rapuna and murry

A

Disfigure or deface need not be permanent damage but also temporary damage

26
Q

R b donavan

A

Bodily harm includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim, it need not be permanent but must no doubt be more then transitory and trifling.

27
Q

R v harney

A

Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk

28
Q

R v tihi

A

Then addition to one of these specific intents outlined In paragraphs A B or C It must be showing that the offender either mean to cause the specified harm or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it

29
Q

R v storm aggravated

A

Under section 191(a) it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove the intended crime was subsequently committed

30
Q

R v sturm stupefy

A

To stupify mains to cause-and-effect on the mind or nervous system of a person, which really seriously interfered with that person’s mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime

31
Q

R v wati

A

Relation to section 191(1)(c) there must be proof that the commission or attempted commission of a crime either by the person committing the assault or by the person whose arrest or flight he intends to avoid or facilitate