Sentencing Flashcards
What act sets out the purposes of sentencing?
The Criminal Justice Act 2003.
What must the court consider when sentencing?
- the punishment of offenders
- the reduction of crime (including reduction by deterrence)
- the reform and rehabilitation of offenders
- the protection of the public
- the making if reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences
What are the main aims of sentencing?
- retribution
- denunciation
- incapacitation
- deterrence (individual and general)
- rehabilitation
- reparation
What is retribution?
This is the idea that we punish because the offender deserves punishment. The punishment must fit the crime and so the sentence must be proportionate to the crime that was committed. This theory was put forward by Von Hirsch who argued that we punish in order to redress the balance. When an offender commits a crime he has an advantage over the rest of society. Punishment is important as it takes away this advantage. ‘The violator ceases to be at an advantage over his non-violating fellow’. It is often known as the ‘just deserts theory. The crudest reform of retribution is an ‘eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’. In the UK retribution exists in the form of tariff sentencing, this is where recommended sentences are provided. The sentencing council is responsible for creating guidelines.
Evaluation of retribution?
This theory has been criticised for being short sighted as it is only concerned with punishment. It does not attempt to rehabilitate the offender in any way. It does not aim to reduce crime or alter the offenders behaviour. It is described by some as ‘institutionalised revenge’. It can be extremely unfair and it is often used to justify harsh sentences. It would not allow the use of ‘mitigating circumstances’ to reduce sentences. For example, a homeless person who committed theft would be treated the same as a person who was wealthy.
What is denunciation?
Denunciation is a way of society expressing disapproval of criminal activity. A sentence indicates to the offender and to society that offending behaviour has been condemned and that justice is being wrong. Denunciation also reinforces moral boundaries and teaches society right from wrong. For example, drink and driving campaigns have now made drink driving a morally frowned upon offence. However, it was previously considered to be acceptable behaviour. Denunciation and retribution usually go hand in hand.
Evaluation of denunciation?
Denunciation theory is problematic because it is limited, it simple denounces criminal behaviour but does not seek to reform offenders. It does not rehabilitate offenders. It can also be used to justify excessive penalties.
What is incapacitation?
Incapacitation states that punishment is necessary if only to prevent an offender from committing further crimes. This protects society from offending behaviour. Of course, the ultimate penalty is the death penalty and in some countries thieves have their hands cut off to prevent further thieving. In America, sex offenders have been incapacitated by medical treatment. Banning drink drivers from driving is also a form of incapacitation. Also a curfew requirement as part of Community Order incapacities through tagging and insisting that offenders remain at home at certain times.
Evaluation of incapacitation?
Incapacitation leads to huge populations, over the last 5 years the prison population has risen by nearly 20,000. This is extremely costly, this UK has one of the highest prison populations in Europe and yet the crime rate is higher than in many other countries. Incapacitation does not try to reform offending behaviour and it is very limited. It is often used with recidivists, people who continue to offend and people who present a threat to society.
What are the two parts of the deterrence theory?
Individual and general.
What is individual deterrence?
Individual deterrence sentencing is concerned with deterring the individual from committing further offences. Excessive sentences can be used here such as heavy fines and lengthy custodial sentences. It assumes that an offender will stop to think about the consequences of his offending behaviour when in fact many offences are committed on the spur of the moment. Much of offending behaviour is also committed through either drugs or alcohol.
Evaluation of individual deterrence?
Individual deterrence sentences can lead to unfair and excessive punishments such as in R V Whitton 1985 where a football hooligan was given a life sentence for football hooligan. Prison is not an effective deterrent as 55% of adult prisoner re-offend withing 2 years of release. The rate is even higher for young offenders at about 80%.
What is general deterrence?
This operates on the basis that excessive penalties will act as a deterrent to the rest of the population. For example in R V Whitton the sentence was given to deter the rest of the population. In R V Ezair 2001 the defendant had robbed a Manchester University student, there had been 700 robberies that year in the vicinity of the university and the judge described this as ‘a blot on the City of Manchester’. He sentenced Ezair to 4 years in prison as a deterrent to others.
Evaluation of general deterrence?
The main problem with general deterrence is excessive penalties. It can lead to lengthy sentences purely to make a point to the rest of society. It is also difficult to measure its effectiveness. America has the death penalty to deter criminals but it has the highest homicide rate in the world. In the UK, evidence does suggest that the cracking down on drink driving has led to a reduction in crime relating to this offence. Critics point out that theory of individual deterrence assumes that offenders stop to consider the consequences of their actions. Most crimes are spur of the moment actions and many are committed under the influence of drink and drugs When there was a police strike in Liverpool in 1919 planned crimes e.g. burglaries, increased but it made no difference to violent crimes. Fear of being caught is more of a deterrent but while crime detection rates are low the threat of a severe penalty is too remote to have much of an impact. General deterrence relies on publicity of severe punishment. It is in direct conflict with the principle of retribution as it involves sentencing offenders to a longer term than is deserved for the specific offence. It is probably the least effective and least fair principle of sentencing.
What is rehabilitation?
The main aim of the theory is to rehabilitate the offender so they can return to normal society and not commit any further offences. Rehabilitation philosophy is reflected in many of the community penalties such as supervision orders, drug treatment and testing orders. Persistent offender are usually less likely to respond to reformative sentences. Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 states that in considering the seriousness of the offence the court may take into consideration any previous failures to respond to previous sentences.