Defences: Duress Flashcards
When can the defence of duress be used?
The defence is only available if the defendant commits an offence of a type that was nominated by the person making the threat.
R V Cole 1994?
The defendant robbed a building society to repay debt as he and his family were being threatened. The court upheld his robbery conviction because the people threatening him didn’t say ‘rob a building society or else’.
What is the defence of duress?
The defence covers a situation where a defendant is forced or feels compelled to commit a criminal offence because of threats by a person or by the circumstances the defendant finds themselves in. The defendant claims that although he committed the actus reus of the crime with the required mens rea. He only did it because he had no effective choice, being faced with threats of death or serious injury. The defence is recognised as a ‘concession to human frailty’ R V Howe 1989. The effect of a successful plea is an acquittal, however this is not a defence to murder or attempted murder.
What is the duress of circumstances?
Duress of circumstances has been recognised since the 1980’s. This is where the threat comes from circumstances rather than a direct threat and coincidentally these early cases were driving cases.
R V Willer 1986?
The defendant and passenger in a car were surrounded by threatening youths. The defendant drove on the pavement to escape. The Court of Appeal allowed his appeal and said duress of circumstances could be considered.
R V Conway 1988?
The defendant drove his car at high speed to escape when he thought two men were about to attack his passenger, the court quashed his conviction saying duress was possible as a defence.
R V Martin 1989?
The defendant was disqualified from driving and his wife threatened to commit suicide unless he drove her son to work, his conviction was quashed due to duress of circumstance.
R V Pommell 1995?
It was said that duress of circumstance is not limited to driving offences. The court said that the jury should be allowed to consider duress and ordered a retrial. The defendant was convicted with possessing an unlicensed firearm during a night time raid. He said he removed the gun from a man during the night and was going to hand it to the police the following morning.
Do the same principles of duress of circumstance apply if the threat is from a person?
The same principles of duress apply whether the threat is from a person or from the circumstances they are in.
What six points must apply for the defendant to be allowed to use the defence of duress?
- there must be a threat of death or serious injury
- the threat must be made to the defendant or to other
- the threat must be immediate
- where the defendant has an opportunity to escape or seek police protection they will not be allowed to use the defence
- where a defendant voluntarily engages in a criminal association they will not be able to plead the defence of duress
- the Graham Test must be successful
How must there be a threat of death or serious injury?
The threat must be of death or serious injury as in R V Hudson and Taylor 1971 where the defendant’s were told they would be ‘cut up later’ if they didn’t lie. R V Hasan 2005 confirmed that the threat must be very serious.
Is a threat to damage or destroy property sufficient?
A threat to damage or destroy property is insufficient for the defence in Lynch V DPP 1975 Lord Simon said ‘the law must draw a line somewhere and the law draws it between threats to property and threats to the person’. This was confirmed in R V Hasan 2005.
Is a threat to reveal someones sexual tendencies or financial position sufficient?
A threat to reveal someones sexual tendencies or financial position on their own are insufficient for the defence. Where there are multiple threats the cumulative nature of threats may be considered but there must still be a threat of death or serious injury.
R V Valderamma-Vega 1985?
The defendant imported cocaine and said he received threats of death, exposure of his homosexuality to his wife and he had high debts. The trial judge said the defence was only available to him if the death threats were the sole reason for committing the defence he was convicted. The Court of Appeal quashed his conviction as the jury could look at the cumulative effect of all the threats but if there had not been a threat of death the other threats would not be enough basis for the defence.
How must threats be made to the defendant or to others?
As well as threats to the defendant, threats to other people are also accepted. In R V Ortiz 1986 the defendant was forced to participate in smuggling cocaine as he was told his ‘family would disappear’ otherwise. Duress was allowed. It is also allowed where friends are involved as in Willer 1986 and Conway 1988.
R V Wright 2000?
The defence was available where a threat was made to the defendants boyfriend. The trial judge excluded her boyfriend as not being ‘sufficiently proximate’ saying that the defence was only available if ‘directed towards a member of immediate family’. The appeal court said this was wrong and allowed her appeal.
R V Shayler 2001?
The court said that the threat could be made in relation to complete strangers. The threat can be to the defence or to ‘some other person or persons for whom he had responsibility or person for whom the situation makes him responsible’.