Semester 2 revision Flashcards

1
Q

Modus ponens

A

Affirms, if A then B. A, therfore B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Modus tollens

A

Denies, if A then B. Not B, therefore not A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Premises

A

Reasons offered in support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conclusion

A

Claims the argument makes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Deductive argument

A

A valid argument with true premises and a true conclusion (are the premises true?, is the argument valid?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Inductive argument

A

argument where the conclusion doesn’t follow the premises (are the premises acceptable, relevant or compelling?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Generalisation

A

Obtained by inferences from a specific case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Induction

A

Giving rise to something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Empiricism

A

All knowledge is based on experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Scepticism

A

True knowledge is uncertain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Change

A

How internal and external environments interact to create change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Causation

A

Relation between two successive events (cause and effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scientific method

A

Testing of universal theories by comparing deductive statements with observations of the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Observations and their problems

A

Conclusions drawn based on what people see
Problems- hard to be unbiased, ‘trained eye’ means some won’t see what others do, some things unobservable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Inductions and their problems

A

Process of generalising from a sample of evidence
Problems- risky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explanations

A

Involves finding a story that ‘fits the facts’, Need a mechanism to be a complete explanation

17
Q

Hume’s theory

A

Anything might cause anything

18
Q

Issues with Hume’s theory

A

We can sometime observe causation (when digging a hole you can see chunks of dirt moving), Doesn’t distinguish between real causes and accidental associations, Can’t tell difference between inputs and outputs (what leads to what)

19
Q

Aristotle’s theory

A

Distinguished between three kinds of change- kinesis, boulesis and morphesis, Kinesis- physical movement (object changing location), Boulesis- changes in our will (changes that lead to emotions), Morphesis- change that happens over time (caterpillars to butterflies)

20
Q

Aristotle’s form of causation

A

Material- something inherent in the material the object is made of that allows change (clay can be moulded), Efficient/moving cause- provides the ‘power’ of the change (potter moulding clay), Final cause- intended end point of change (making a cup), Formal cause- blueprint/plan (cup shape formed by a potter)

21
Q

Thought experiment

A

Take place in the imagination and only involve ideas, Conceptual questions where performing the experiment wouldn’t give us an answer

22
Q

Dialectic

A

Dialogue between two or more points of view, Begins with a claim that is challenged meaning a counter-example together, Involves a thesis (idea), antithesis (opposing idea) and synthesis (resolves conflict)

23
Q

Rational proof

A

Shows that not all knowledge is based on observation and experience (no actual measurements are needed)

24
Q

Libertarianism

A

View that free will exists, Human beings are capable of making choices that aren’t determined by the prior causes of behaviour, Subscribes to principle of alternative possibility suggesting that no one can be held for their behaviour unless there was some alternative

25
Q

Notions of libertarianism

A

Not all events are caused, Decisions are not caused events, Argues that if we subscribe to the notion of free will, we must suppose some events are not caused

26
Q

Criticisms of libertarianism

A

Uncaused events are doubtful, No rational models for how something can interact with another without causing in to do something

27
Q

Determinism

A

View that there is no such thing as free will, All human behaviour is fixed by a combination of natural and social laws, Recognizes the principle of alternative possibilities, Cannot be held responsible as there is no free will

28
Q

Notions of determinism

A

All events have causes, Any event has a unique set of causes, Given that unique set of causes that event and only that event could have occurred

29
Q

Principle of alternative possibilities

A

We can be held responsible only for those actions for which there was some alternative, A person is morally responsible for what they have done if they could have done otherwise

30
Q

Criticisms of determinism

A

Quantum physics and chaos theory- certain natural phenomena exhibit unknown behaviour, Biological and genetic behaviour are subject to change, mutation and variation, Higher cortical functions are reflexive (automatic)

31
Q

Compatibilism

A

Assumption of free will and the existence of a concept of determinism are compatible with each other, Free will is self-determination/self-caused behaviour, Agrees with determinism

32
Q

Materialism

A

mind is an extension of the body but inseparable, mind is nothing more than the brain, if the brain dies the mind must also die

33
Q

Valid, sound, cogent

A

Logical, true, convincing

34
Q

Mind and body

A

Dualism- mind is distinct from the body, materialism- mind is an extension of the body but inspeparable

35
Q

Morally strong vs morally weak

A

Morally strong people are capable of self-control despite temptations, morally weak are people who intend to do good but give into temptations

36
Q

Self controlled vs self indulgent

A

Someone who no longer feels desires for untoward pleasures vs person who chooses immediate pleasures without regard for benefit