Section B: Scientific Processes Flashcards
Sampling: What is meant by the term ‘target population’?
A ‘target population’ is a group of people (who share a given set of characteristics) about who the researcher wishes to draw a conclusion.
-As the target population is normally too large to allow all of the people to be tested, due to reasons of cost and practicality, the researcher just obtains a sample instead.
Why should a sample be REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TARGET POPULATION?
-Because the researcher intends to GENERALISE ANY CONCLUSIONS GENERATED using their sample TO THE ENTIRE TARGET POPULATION, the sample should be REPRESENTATIVE of the entire population (i.e. they should share the same characteristics).
If the sample is NOT representative, it is said to have LOW POPULATION VALIDITY.
No method of sampling can guarantee a representative sample, but some are better than others!
What are the FIVE sampling techniques?
-RANDOM sampling.
-OPPORTUNITY sampling.
-SYSTEMATIC sampling.
-STRATIFIED sampling.
-VOLUNTEER sampling.
(A01) What is random sampling?
ii) How is this carried out?
-With this technique, EVERY PERSON in the TARGET POPULATION has an EQUAL CHANCE of being selected.
- The researcher first OBTAINS A LIST OF EVERYONE IN THE TARGET POPULATION.
2.Then a computerised random generator or the ‘names out of a hat’ technique is used to select the required amount of participants.
(e.g. to form a sample of 20 participants from a target population of 100, the first 20 names out of the hat are selected to take part in the research).
Alternatively, a random number / name generator could be used.
(A03) STRENGTH of random sampling (would the sample be representative?)
P: The sample is likely to be representative.
E: The researcher has NO CONTROL over WHO IS SELECTED which REDUCES THE CHANCE OF A BIAS SAMPLE BEING SELECTED.
E: This therefore improves population validity compared to other techniques.
(A03) LIMITATION of random sampling (think about the process - time consuming?)
P: Random sampling can be DIFFICULT and TIME CONSUMING.
E: Before the sample is selected, the researcher needs to make a list of all the sample and put the names into a random generator/hat.
E: This is a weakness as it is particularly problematic if there is a large population –> This type of sampling is not time efficient, unless you have a very small sample.
(A03) Limitation of random sampling (Is the sample guaranteed to be representative?)
P: Random sampling as a sampling method does NOT GUARANTEE a representative sample.
E: Even though the method is random, SOME GROUPS MAY BE OVERREPRESENTED or NOT SELECTED.
E: Therefore, this may be less representative than other methods such as STRATIFIED SAMPLING.
(A01) What is OPPORTUNITY SAMPLING?
With this technique, the researcher SELECTS ANYONE WHO IS READILY AVAILABLE and WILLING TO TAKE PART. The researcher simply ASKS THE PEOPLE WHO IT IS MOST CONVINIENT FOR THEM TO ASK.
(e.g. a researcher who also works as a university lecturer may ask students in their seminar group to participate in their study.)
(A03) Strength of opportunity sampling (think about the process of obtaining a sample - is it easy?)
P: Sample is EASY TO OBTAIN and THEREFORE COST EFFECTIVE.
E: The researcher uses THE FIRST PEOPLE THAT THEY SEE –>PPTS ARE READILY AVAILABLE.
E: Therefore, a sample does not need to be identified prior to the research taking place.
(A03) Limitation of opportunity sampling (is the sample likely to be representative if ppts are readily available?)
P: The sample is likely to be UNREPRESENTATIVE.
E: The researcher USES THE FIRST PEOPLE THAT THEY SEE.
E: Therefore, ppts are likely to SHARE SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS (e.g. all psychology students) and BACKGROUNDS (reducing population validity).
(A03) Limitation of opportunity sampling (ethical issues associated –> pressure on ppts to take part?)
P: There may be ethical issues associated with this sampling technique.
E: The researcher uses PARTICIPANTS WHO ARE READILY AVAILABLE AND WILLING TO TAKE PART.
E: Therefore, students of lecturers, for example, MAY FEEL PRESSURE TO TAKE PART which would CREATE PROBLEMS SURROUNDING CONSENT AND RIGHT TO WITHDRAW.
(A01) What is volunteer sampling?
With this technique, participants PUT THEMSELVES FORWARD FOR INCLUSION (i.e. they self-select).
-The researcher places an initial advertisement in a magazine/newspaper, on the radio, on the internet/ via email or on a public notice board (i.e. workplace or gym), asking for volunteers to take part in research.
-They may also place questionnaires somewhere public and ask people to return their answers.
(A03) Strength of volunteer sampling (locating a niche group of people?)
P: Volunteer sampling may be the ONLY WAY TO LOCATE A PARTICULARLY NICHE GROUP OF PEOPLE (e.g. people who suffered from child abuse, diabetes).
E: The researcher can ADVERTISE FOR THIS SPECIFIC GROUP who MAY BE OTHERWISE DIFFICULT TO IDENTIFY.
E: This can therefore save time in gathering the sample where niche groups are required.
(A03) Weakness of Volunteer Sampling (sample lacking generalisation?)
P: The sample MAY LACK GENERALISATION.
E: The researcher uses ADVERTISEMENTS that are published so that participants can PUT THEMSELVES FORWARD. This therefore relies upon people seeing an advertisement in order to put themselves forward
E: This therefore limits the POPULATION VALIDITY as it FAILS TO REFLECT A WIDE VARIETY OF MEMBERS FROM THE TARGET POPULATION –> it may REDUCE THE SIZE AND VARIABILITY OF THE SAMPLE (similar backgrounds e.g. all readers of the same newspaper).
(A03) Counter - Strength (people self-selecting themselves) in volunteer sampling - Why is this positive?
P: The researcher uses advertisements to recruit ppts, meaning participants put themselves forward. Such ppts are LIKELY TO BE COOPERATIVE AND MOTIVATED (shared characteristics).
E: This is arguably a strength as you can ensure all participants fully consent to taking part and ppts are likely to be more engaged as they are willing to take part –> researchers can rely on them to give honest, genuine results instead of rushing as they want to leave the experiment.
(A01) What is SYSTEMATIC sampling?
-This is where every nth member of the target population is selected, for example, every 5th pupil on a register.
-A sampling frame is produced, which is a list of people in the target population, organised into for instance, alphabetical order.
-A sampling system is nominated (every 3rd/ 5th person) or this may be determined randomly to reduce bias.
-The researcher then works through the sampling frame until the sample is complete.
(A03) Strength of SYSTEMATIC sampling? (avoids what from the researcher and would the sample be representative?)
P: Systematic sampling AVOIDS researcher bias.
E: Once the system for selection has been established, the researcher has NO INFLUENCE over who is chosen (even more the case if the system is randomly selected).
E: This therefore INCREASES VALIDITY and should lead TO A MORE REPRESENTATIVE sample.
(A03) Weakness of SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING (does it GUARANTEE a representative sample?)
P: Systematic sampling as a sampling method DOES NOT GUARANTEE A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE.
E: Even though the method is RANDOM, some groups may be OVERREPRESENTED or NOT SELECTED.
E: Therefore, this may be LESS REPRESENTATIVE than other methods such as STRATFIED SAMPLING.
(A01) What is STRATIFIED SAMPLING?
-This is when the COMPOSITION OF A SAMPLE REFLECTS THE PROPORTIONS OF PEOPLE IN SUB-GROUPS (STRATA) WITHIN THE TARGET POPULATION.
- The researcher would first IDENTIFY the different strata that make up the population.
- Then, the proportions needed for the sample to be representative need to be worked out. The participants that make up each strata are selected using random sampling (e.g. all names written down and put into hat, the first ones pulled out make up the sample).
GIVE AN EXAMPLE OF THE USE OF STRATIFIED SAMPLING TO OBTAIN A SAMPLE?
In Manchester, 40% of people support Manchester City, 40% Manchester United, 15% Bolton and 5% Leeds.
In a sample of 20 participants - there would be (no of fans):
Manchester City: (40% of 20) = 8
Manchester United: 8
Bolton (15% of 20) = 3
Leeds (5% of 20) = 1
(A03) Strength of STRATIFIED sampling (avoids researcher…)
P: Stratified sampling AVOIDS RESEARCHER BIAS.
E: Once subdivided into the strata, stratified sampling ensures that all groups are represented and the researcher HAS NO INFLUENCE OVER WHO IS CHOSEN.
E: As such, this method gives an ACCURATE REFLECTION of the target population which leads to INCREASED POPULATION VALIDITY.
(A03) Limitation of STRATIFIED sampling (is it time consuming?)
P: Stratified sampling is TIME CONSUMING compared to other methods.
E: The researcher needs knowledge of the DIFFERENT STRATA THAT MAKE UP THE POPULATION and then the proportions needed for the sample to be representative then needs to be worked out. The participants that make up each strata are then selected using random sampling (names in hat!).
E: As such, this takes TIME and requires the researcher knowing ALL ppts and details of the sample.
(A03) Limitation of Stratified sampling (is it completely representative?)
P: Stratified sampling is NOT completely representative.
E: Identified strata cannot reflect all of the possible sub-groups that exist.
E: Therefore, complete representation of the target population is not always possible.