Section 5 - R27 - Investment Manager Selection Flashcards
Key Asspects in Manager Selection (List)
- Define the universe (suitability, style, active or passive)
- Quant Analysis (track record, capture ratios, attribution and appraisal, drawdown)
- Qualitative Analysis:
- Investment Due Diligence (philosophy, process, people)
- Operational Due Diligence (philosophy, investment vehicle, terms, monitoring)
Types of Errors in Investment Manager (List and Explain)
H0: Investment Skill = 0
Error Type 1: H0 is true. Error is to reject and CHOOSE manager.
- Should have rejected manager
Error Type 2: H0 is false. Error is to NOT reject and AVOID manager.
- Should have accepted manager
Errors Type 1 and Type 2 implications (Describe)
Type 1: Errors of Comission.
- Should have rejected manager.
- Hired underperforming manager.
- Psychologically more painful.
- Cost: Explicit. More transparent.
Type 2: Error of Omission.
- Cost: Opportunity (Comission)
- If consistent error, shows weakness of the investment manager selection process
Difference in expected cost between Type I and Type II (Describe)
Higher the smaller the perceived difference between the distribution of skilled and unskilled managers.
Quantitative Elements of Selection (List and Describe)
- Style Analysis
- Returns Based Analysis
- Holdings Based Analysis
- Style Analysis
- Style Analysis: Understanding
the manager’s risk exposures relative to the bench + how they evolve over time.
Must be:
- Meaningful (reported risks must represent important sources of risk exposures)
- Accurate (must reflect actual risk exposures)
- Consistent (methodology must allow for comparison over time)
- Timely (information should be timely)
- Returns Based Analysis
- Top down approach
- Estimate portfolio’s sensitivities to security market indexes representing risk factors
Pros: easy to manipulate, not too much data to compile
Cons: imprecise, not accurate, may not reflect future holdings, illiquid holdings may have stale prices
- Holdings Based Approach
- Bottom up approach
- Point in time analysis
Pros: Comparable across managers and through time
Cons:
- Complex
- Subject to window dressing
- Requires Transparency
- May not reflect portfolio going fwd
Qualitative Elements of Selection (List and Describe)
- Investment Philosophy: Manager’s underlying assumptions that drive the investment performance, including inefficiencies
- Investment Personnel: Is there sufficient personnel with the adequate experience and expertise?
- Investment Decision Making Process: Signal creation, signal capture, portfolio construction, monitoring.
- Quali: Investment Philosophy (Describe)
Manager’s underlying assumptions that drive the investment performance
- Strategy:
- Passive (Premium = f factors)
- Active (Premium = f mispricing)
- Inefficiencies:
- Behavioral (temporary)
- Structural (Permanent)
- Other Assumptions:
- Market Convergence
- Correlations
- Macro Influence
- Investment Personnel
- Sufficient experience, expertise and depth?
- Is there key person risk?
- Turnover
- Investment Decision Making Process
a. Signal Creation: Generate idea
b. Signal Capture: Translate in an investment idea. Repeatable?
c. Portfolio Construction: Implement Position
d. Monitoring.
Investment Vehicles (List)
- Individual Separately Mgd Account
- Pooled / Comingled Vehicle
9.
- Individual Separately Mgd Account (Describe)
- Individual Separately Mgd Account
- Ownership: Não afeta outros investidores. Clear legal ownership.
- Customization: Accomodate constraints / preferences
- Tax Efficiency: No other withdrawals
- Transparency: Real Time Information
Cons:
- Escalation issues
- High costs
- Tracking Risk (Customization)
- Attribution messy due to constraints
- Pooled / Comingled Vehicle (Describe)
- Money from multiple investors held as a single portfolio
- No customization