Section 3 Flashcards
Community Policing
-History of Policing
~Community Era
*Goals
**Public Involvement
**Return to Peel’s Principles
Problem-Oriented Policing (POP)
-1980’s
~Herman Goldstein (University of Wisconsin)
-Professional Model/Standard Model of Policing
~Ineffectient and reactive
-Simple patrol and high arrests
~Not effective in crime reduction and public satisfaction
-Premise
~Crime is not random
~Crime is caused by underlying causes/ criminogenic areas
~Police should address the source of problems, not just react to it
*Police should ask: “Why is this happening?”
-Goals
Problem-Oriented Policing (POP)
-1980’s
~Herman Goldstein (University of Wisconsin)
-Professional Model/Standard Model of Policing
~Ineffectient and reactive
-Simple patrol and high arrests
~Not effective in crime reduction and public satisfaction
-Premise
~Crime is not random
~Crime is caused by underlying causes/ criminogenic areas
~Police should address the source of problems, not just react to it
*Police should ask: “Why is this happening?”
-Goals
~Reduce repeat calls for service or incidents
*RPD approximately 400 calls/day
*Provide problem-solving tools to officers
~Involve the community in problem-solving
*Police cannot do it all alone
*Community has a stake in the solution too
~ULTIMATE GOAL:
*Focus on one crime = Reduce three (or more)
**DIffusion of Benefits
-Interrelatedness of crime
~Disorder + small crimes = larger crimes
Adopting/ Implementing POP
-Should be a department-wide strategy
-A paradigm shift from the old police model
-Assessment is key
-Need to welcome “out of box” ideas
-Cultural shift in police department
Problem-Oriented Policing
-The SARA Model
-The Problem Analysis Triangle
The SARA Model
-Overview
~Scanning
Hierarchical list of problems in area/beat.neighborhood
**Involves diverse views of areas and people living in it
**Drugs are not always the worst problem
*Identify the consequences of a problem for both the community and the police
~Analysis
*Who, What, When, Where, and How of the problem at hand
*Understand dynamics surrounding the problem
*Identify possible explanations of why the problem is occurring
*DATA! DATA! DATA!
*For Prostitution:
**Calls for service
**Beat officer
**School Principals
**Business Owners
**Motel owners
**Pimps
**Other prostitutes
**“Johns”
**Emergency room staff
**Homeless shelters
**Convenience stores
**Sanitation workers
**Wives/Family
**Etc…
~Response
*Intervention created from the results of an analysis
**“Out of Box” solution
**Avoid typical police responses
**Brainstorm as to possible solutions
**Include stakeholders
*IMPLEMENTATION IS KEY
~Assessment
*Evaluate response
*Did implementation follow the response plan?
*Were intended results achieved?
*Adjust if necessary
-Conclusion
~Overall goals
*Work with the community to prevent problems
*Reduce repeat police problems
*Rely on “evidence-based” practices
~More cost-effective/ Increased officer autonomy and ownership of the beat
~If successful, can be applied to other/ similar situations
Problem Analysis Triangle
-Three elements for crime to occur
~Offender
*Repeat Victimization
*Routine Activities
*Victim Precipitation
~Victim
*Few Offenders = Majority of Crimes
*Routine Activities
*Rational Choice Model
~Location
*Crimiongenic Areas
*Hot Spots
-Visualize problem
-Understand the relationship of crime
-PROACTIVE POLICING IN ACTION
-Handlers
~Control Offenders
-Managers
~Controls Places
-Guardians
~Protect targets/victims
Crime Prevention
-Heart of community and problem-oriented policing
~CRIME PREVENTION
*Much more time and cost-effective
*“How can we prevent crime?”
CPTED
-Problem
-Problem-Oriented Policing
-SARA Model
-CPTED
~After the environment of the problem
CPTED
-“Proper design and effective use of the environment that can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime, and an improvement in the quality of life.”
-Three Principles
~Natural access control
~Natural surveillance
~Territoraial reinforcement
CPTED
-Information needed for planning
-Crime-analysis information
~Demographic
~Land use information
~Resident information
CPTED
-Example
-Motorcycle theft
-Car theft
-Drunk driving
-ATm Vandalism
-Credit card Fraud
-Any crime
-Ticket scalping/theft
-Homeless in bathrooms
-Smoking. snorting pills
-Helmet laws
-Alarms. Keyless ignition
-Alcohol sensors in the steering wheel
-Cameras in machines
-Chip in card
-Increased lighting
-Bar codes on tickets
-Key card for access
-Pills gumming up when tampered with
Repeat Victimization
-More attention on criminal offenders than victims
-Research = police would benefit from knowing more about victims; play major role in crime prevention and analysis
-Want to know where crime will occur next…?
-Look at what happened last!
~Use as a formal crime-prevention effort
~Best single predictor routinely available to police
~Examples:
*Burglary
*Sexual incidents
*Assaults/threats
*Vehicle vandalism
Smart Policing
-Emphasis on data and analytics
-Improved crime analysis, performance measurement, and evaluation research
-Known as Smart Policing Initiative (SPI)
~Research partnership with Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA)
Compstat
-Comparative or Computer Statistics (CompStat)
-Collective and feedback on information on crime
-Introduced 1994 New York City Police Department
-58% large agencies adopted or planed to implement CompStat-like program
CompStat
-Key Elements
-Specific objectives
-Accurate and timely intelligence
-Effective tactics
-Rapid deployment of personnel and resources
-Relentless follow-up and assessment
CompStat
-1990’s
-NYPD/ East Coast
-Data analysis to assessment efficiency
-Problem of poor crime reporting to show the effectiveness
Rule of Law
-“No person, government official or government entity is above the law… no law , or doesn’t conform with fairness
-In terms of policing, officers need to follow procedures and the law.
~Otherwise violation of social contact
~Also illegal
-Tension between the role of the police
~Crime Control or Due Process?
-When in doubt, look to the constitution, the laws of the land, and to proper procedures.
-In policing, ends do not justify means
~Need for regulation
The Police
-Democratic government = little value if police can do whatever they want
-Constitutional Amendments
~Regulate police and prevent abuse of power
*4th Amendment
*5th Amendment
*6th Amendment
The Forth Amendment
-The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon PROBLEM CAUSE, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
-Any police-initiated contact infringes on liberty
~PROBABLE CAUSE
*Reason for arrest or search
~Protection from “unreasonable” search and seizure
-Rule of Law = protections from police intrusions
Probable Cause
-Do police have reason to detain or search you?
~They witnessed a crime
~They have information you have or may have committed a crime
Exclusionary Rule
-Any evidence not collected within rules of law, or without PROBABLE CAUSES has to be excluded in court
-“Fruits of the poisonous tree” doctrine
~ANY evidence gathered after an illegal search will by excluded
-Mapp v. Ohio
Exclusionary Rule
-Exceptions
-Public safety exception
-Inevitability of discovery
-Police error
Arrests
-A restriction on the right of the police to arrest is the hallmark of a free society
-Arrest with warrant
-Warrantless arrest
~Traffic stops
*DUI checkpoints
~DHS 100 mile border checkpoints
~Drug checkpoints