Section 11 - Macroeconomic Policy Instruments Flashcards
Fiscal policy - definition
> Fiscal policy (or budgetary policy) involves government spending (public expenditure) and taxation.
It can be used to influence the economy as a whole (macroeconomic effects) or individual firms and people (microeconomic effects).
What can fiscal policy be used for?
> Fiscal policy can be used to stimulate aggregate demand.
Types of fiscal policy
- Reflationary fiscal policy (a.k.a ‘expansionary’ or ‘loose’ fiscal policy) involves boosting AD by increasing government spending or lowering taxes. It’s likely to involve a government having a budget deficit.
- Deflationary fiscal policy (a.k.a ‘contractionary’ or ‘tight’ fiscal policy) involves reducing AD by reducing government spending or increasing taxes. It’s likely to involve a budget surplus.
Budget deficit - quick point
government spending > revenue.
Budget surplus - quick point
government spending < revenue.
Expansionary fiscal policy
> Is likely to be used during a recession or when there’s a negative output gap.
It’ll increase economic growth and reduce unemployment, but it’ll also increase inflation and worsen the current account of the balance of payments because as incomes increase, more is spent on imports.
Contractionary fiscal policy
> Is likely to be used during a boom or when there’s a positive output gap.
It’ll reduce economic growth and increase unemployment, but it’ll also reduce price levels and improve the current account of the balance of payments because as incomes fall, less is spent on imports.
Governments fiscal stance
> A government’s fiscal stance or budget position describes whether a policy is reflationary (known as expansionary stance), deflationary (known as contractionary stance), or neither (a neutral stance).
If a government has a neutral fiscal stance then government spending and taxation has no net effect on AD.
2 important features of fiscal policy
- Automatic stabilisers
2. Discretionary policy
Automatic stabilisers
> Some of a government’s fiscal policy may automatically react to changes in the economic cycle.
During a recession, government spending will increase because the government will pay out more benefits, e.g. JSA. The government will also receive less tax revenue, e.g. due to unemployment.
These automatic stabilisers reduce the problems a recession causes, but at the expense of creating a budget deficit.
During a boom, the automatic stabilisers create a budget surplus as tax revenue increases and government spending on benefits falls.
Discretionary policy
> This is where governments deliberately change their level of spending and tax.
At any given point a government might choose to spend on improving the country’s infrastructure or services, and increase taxes to pay for it.
On other occasions the government might take action because of the economic situation, e.g. during a recession the government might spend more and cut taxes to stimulate AD.
Structural budget position - definition
> A structural budget position is a government’s long-term fiscal stance.
This means their budget position over a whole period of the economic cycle, including booms and/or recessions.
Cyclical budget position - definition
> A cyclical budget position is a government’s fiscal stance in the short term.
This is affected by where the economy is in the economic cycle - automatic stabilisers are likely to create a surplus (i.e. a contractionary budget position) during a boom and a deficit (i.e. an expansionary budget position) during a recession.
Budget deficits and surpluses
> A budget deficit caused by an expansionary cyclical budget position is known as a cyclical budget deficit.
This will be balanced out by a budget surplus during boom times when the cyclical budget position is contractionary.
A budget deficit caused by an expansionary structural budget position where spending is more than revenue in the long term will add to national debt. This is called a structural budget deficit.
Taxes - features
> Taxes should be:
- cheap to collect
- easy to pay
- hard to avoid
- shouldn’t create any undesirable disincentives (e.g. discourage people from working or from saving).
What may governments want taxes to achieve?
> Governments may want taxes to achieve horizontal and vertical equity:
- Horizontal equity will mean that people who have similar incomes and ability to pay taxes should pay the same amount of tax.
- Vertical equity will mean that people who have higher incomes and greater ability to pay taxes should pay more than those on lower incomes with less ability to pay taxes.
What may governments also want taxes to promote?
> Promote equality in an economy
This might involve using taxes to reduce major differences in people’s disposable income, or to raise revenue to pay for benefits and the state provision of services.
How do governments raise tax?
> Governments raise tax through direct taxation (e.g. income tax) and indirect taxation (e.g. VAT or excise duty).
They also use different tax systems to achieve different economic objectives - the ones you need to know are progressive, regressive and proportional taxation.
Progressive taxation
> Progressive taxation is where an individual’s taxes rise (as a percentage of their income) as their income rises, and it’s often used to redistribute income and reduce poverty.
A government can use the tax revenue from those on high incomes and redistribute it to those on low incomes in the form of benefits or state-provided merit goods - increasing equality.
Progressive taxation follows the ‘ability to pay’ principle (the tax achieves vertical equity.)
Regressive taxation
> Regressive taxation is where an individual’s taxes fall (as a percentage of their income) as their income rises, and they’re used by governments to encourage supply-side growth.
By reducing the taxes of the rich the government will hope that the economy will benefit from the trickle-down effect.
A regressive tax system gives people more incentive to work harder and earn more income, but it may increase inequality.
Proportional taxation
> Proportional taxation (a ‘flat tax’) is where everyone pays the same proportion of tax regardless of their income level.
This tax system can achieve horizontal equity, but setting a fair tax rate to apply to all members of society is difficult.
For example, a 25% tax on income might be too high for those on lower incomes to afford, and it might not raise enough revenue from those on higher incomes for the government to be able to pay for all of the public goods and services it provides.
Flat tax - for
> Supporters of a flat tax argue that it can simplify the tax system, reduce the incentive to evade and avoid paying taxes (flat taxes often charge high earners less than variable rates), and increase the incentive to earn more.
Flat tax - against
> Flat tax rate systems may bring in less tax overall than variable tax rate systems.
Flat rate tax systems also don’t have vertical equity, but they can be made more progressive by having a tax free allowance (where you don’t pay any tax until you earn a certain amount).
Argument against increasing tax rates
> Supply-side economists argue that increasing direct taxes creates a disincentive to work and will reduce a government’s tax revenue. This is shown on the Laffer curve.
The Laffer curve shows that as taxes increase, eventually this will lead to a decline in tax revenue because people will have less incentive to work.
What can the size of government spending be affected by?
- The size and structure of a country’s population. A country with a large population will require greater levels of gov spending, and a country with an ageing population will have greater demand for state-funded health care.
- Government policies on inequality, poverty and the redistribution of income will alter the amount of government spending - this may vary from gov to gov based on their political views. E.g. a gov that wants to redistribute income may spend more on benefits.
- The fiscal policies governments use to tackle certain problems in a country will also have an effect. During a recession a gov may increase public spending to encourage growth and reduce unemployment, but if these policies lead to a large national debt then the gov may introduce ‘austerity measures’ and severely reduce their spending.
Definition - budget deficit
> A budget deficit (PSNB - Public Sector Net Borrowing) is what a government borrows in a single year.
Definition - national debt
> The national debt (PSND - Public Sector Net Debt) is the total debt (run up over time).
Budget deficit
> A budget deficit (PSNB) must be paid for by public sector borrowing, so that the government can spend more money than it receives in revenue.
In the UK, the government can borrow the money it needs from UK banks, which will create deposits that the government can spend. It can also borrow money from the private sector by selling Treasury Bills, which the government will pay off over a period of time, or it can borrow money from the foreign financial markets.
This kind of borrowing is fine in the short run, especially if the borrowed money is used to stimulate demand in a country. But there will be problems if there’s excessive borrowing.
Continued government borrowing will increase a country’s national debt (PSND). A large and long-term national debt can cause several problems too.
Problems caused by excessive borrowing
- Excessive borrowing could cause demand-pull inflation, partly due to the fact that government borrowing increases the money supply, so there’s more money in the economy than can be matched by output.
- As borrowing may cause inflation, it can also lead to a rise in interest rates to curb that inflation. Higher interest rates will discourage investment by firms and make a country’s currency rise in value, meaning that its exports are less price competitive.
- Methods to correct a budget deficit will depend on what kind of budget deficit it is.
Problems caused by a large and long-term national debt
- If a country’s debt becomes very large then it may cause firms and foreign countries to stop lending money to that country’s government. This will constrain the country’s ability to grow in the future.
- Future taxpayers will be left with large interest payments on debt to pay off. Debt repayments have an opportunity cost as future governments may have to cut spending to pay off debt, which may harm economic growth.
- A large national debt suggests that there’s been excessive borrowing, which causes inflation and interest rates to rise. It also suggest that public sector spending is very large, which may ‘crowd out’ private sector spending. Although, if government spending boosts the economy there may be ‘crowding in’ instead (public sector spending may increase private sector spending) - firms will invest more if the economy is growing quickly.
- A country with large debt is less attractive to FDI, as foreign countries will be uncertain how the debtor nation’s economy will do in the future and whether it will be a good bet for investment.