Second half Flashcards
what is the null for the Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity
Null of homoskedasticity:
H0: E(ui^2|xi)=σ^2
what is the alternative Breusch-Pagan test
E(ui^2|xi)=h(xi’δ) where h(.) is some general, unknown and unspecified function
for GLS and WLS what is the conditional variance function given by
E(ui^2|xi)=σ^2(h(xi), σ^2 arbitrary, unknown constant, the (positive) function h(xi) is known (eg h(xi)=x2i^2)
which has fatter tails out of logit and probit
logit has fatter tails
what is the pseudo R^2 for logit and probit
R^2 = 1 - logL(βhat)/logL0(β0hat),
logL0(β0hat) is value of log likelihood w/ just a constant,
what is the test for multiple hypothesis in logit
likelihood ratio test: logLu(βhat) the log-likelihood in unrestricted model and logLr(βtilda) restricted model.
LR=-2(logLr(βtilda)-logLu(βtilda))–>d χs^2
how do you work out the conditional log-likelihood function
write down the conditional density (bernoulli thing), then take logs
consequence of heteroskedasticity for OLS
as E(ui|xi)=0, OLS still unbiased, consistent and normally distributed in large, OLS no longer BLUE, robust standard errors need to be used (homoskedastic ses wrong) (doesn't make it efficient, robust just allows for inference)
what do you need to remember for Breusch Pagan stat
nR^2,
have to multiply by n and compare to χk^2 distribution where k is number of regressors testing,
R^2 gives correlation because R^2 is measure of correlation, if large then heteroskedasticity
why is ols good under homoskedasticity
because it gives equal weight to observations
what does the weighted least squares do
divide by square root of variance, large variance gets divided by large number and hence gets smaller weight
difference between feasible gls and wls
feasible GLS is where the variance function is not known, it is approximated by specifying a function for heteroskedasticity and estimate the unknown parameters in it
what are the main assumptions of unit root tests (DF or ADF)
residuals are not serially correlated,
correct model specification,
shouldn’t be structural breaks
alternative for f test / Breusch-Pagan test
H0: β=0 for all β,
H1: βj≠0, for at least one value of j
what is the difference between working out E(εtεt-s) for MA(1) and AR(1)
AR(1) don’t substitute both for the equation,
MA(1) do substitute both equations