ScRP, and studies Flashcards

1
Q

Tagge

A

oral hygiene instruction vs scaling and root planing
-2 groups 1)root planing +OHI or 2)OHI
Results: mean PD were reduced by 1.34 mm in group 1 and 0.56 mm in group 2
-mean attachment gain in group 1 =0.52 mm and group 2=0.05 mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lindhe.,

A

“healing following surgical/non-surgical txt of pd disease”

  • sites that received SRP with surgery lost attachment when initial PD was less than 4 mm
  • if initial PD was 4-6 mm= no change in attachment
  • if initial PD were greater than 6 mm, sites gained attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lindhe

A

“critical probing depths in pd therapy”

  • sites that had open SRP lost attachment when initial PD were less than 4.2 mm
  • sites that received SRP lost attachment when initial PD were less than 2.9 mm
  • attachment gains with surgery surpassed scaling alone at initial PD of 5.5 mm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ramfjord

A

“four modalities of txt over 5 years”

  • compared pocket elim/red surger, modified flap surgery, subging curettage and SRP
  • 1-3 mm pockets: scaling or curettage significantly less attachment loss than surgery
  • 4-6 mm pockets: scaling or curettage significantly more attachment gain than surgery
  • 7-12 mm pockets: no significant difference between procedures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Caffesse

A

“scaling and RP efficacy with and without flaps surgery”

  • 1-3 mm pockets, 86% of all surfaces were calc free in both SRP (open and closed)
  • 4-6 mm pockets, 43% of surfaces were calc free in closed SRP, and 76% were calc free in open SRP
  • greater than 6 mm, 32% in closed, 50% in open
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Caton

A

“healing following SRP”

  • histo analysis at 9 months after SRP and oral hygiene regimen
  • long junctional epithelium with no new connective tissue attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rosenberg and Ash

A

“root surface roughness: why is it important?”

  • 3 groups, curette, ultrasonics, control
  • results: roughness: control>ultrasonics>curette
  • no significant difference in mean plaque score or mean inflammatory index between the groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lenkes

A

“root surface roughness”

  • curette vs finishing bur
  • results: roughness: bur>curette
  • subgingival colonization was greater in the bur treated group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly