Schizophrenia Flashcards
Delay and Deniker
o The chance observation that chlorpromazine induced a calming effect initiated a remarkable period of efficacious therapy
o In France, chlorpromazine was being tried as an anaesthesia adjunct that might prevent shock or have beneficial properties
o Chosen as the least sedative of the antihistamines available at the time, it was tested in a wide variety of patients
o When tried in patients with SCZ, Delay and Deniker reported their results at a psychiatric meeting in Luxemburg and then very quickly in a journal article in 1952 describing spectacular results in acutely psychotic SCZ pts
Wright (2000)
Found a number of changes e.g. ventricular enlargement, decreased cortical, grey matter, hippocampal+thalamic volume + larger basal ganglia. Likewise, there is reduced blood flow to the globus pallidus and frontal lobes Overall, cerebral volume decreased by 3% but w careful sterotaxic counts it is seen that a higher density of neurons remains in this volume (no real change in number of neurons so brain is more densely populated - strange!)
Moncrieff and Leo (2010)
SR of MRI studies looking at the role of antipsychotic medication onstructural changes found decreased grey matter and increased ventricular volume associated w antipsychotic treatment; limited changes in drug-naïve pts 14 of 26 longitudinal studies showed a decline in global brain or grey matter volume or an increase in ventricular or CSF volume during the course of drug treatment some evidence points towards the possibility that antipsychotic drugs reduce the volume of brain matter and increase ventricular fluid volume, ANTIPSYCHOTICS MAY CONTRIBUTE TO THE GENESIS OF SOME OF THE ABNORMALITIES USUALLY ATTRIBUTED TO SCHIZOPHRENIA
Connel 1957
published a series of case reports showing amphetamines, which cause DA release, induce psychotic symptoms akin to SCZ positive symptoms
APs (indeed all currently licensed) reduce DA transmission and inhibit positive symptoms of DA in ~70% of pts
Angrist et al 1970
Looked at effects of amphetamine in 4 healthy subjects. Lead to hallucinations and delusions. Known to increase DA
amphetamine also increases NA and 5-HT, participants were experienced amphetamine users - might have neurophysiological/chemical changes in brain
Johnstone 1978
clinical trial compared AP drug alpha-flupenthixol vs placebo and against beta-flupenthixol (optical isomer which does not bind to D2R), which was more efficacious than control and isomer, demonstrating necessity of DR2 blockage
Seeman 1976
They used PET. Measured 3H haloperidol conc before/after addition of different APs. Plotted DAR affinity (ability to displace haloperidol) with clinical dose needed for efficacy, finding a strong correlation between efficacy of APs and affinity for D2 receptors
Was in vitro - does this apply in vivo?
Howes 2013
18F-DOPA (radiolabelled DOPA) in PET of AP-free SCZ, increased DOPA uptake in striatal neurons, w extent of uptake correlating w the severity of symptoms (key finding), and elevated in pts w prodromal psychotic symptoms (before onset of disease), and further elevated w onset of acute psychosis
Volkow 1999
Used 11[C]-raclopride which binds D2Rs to measure amphetamine-induced DA release, fewer radiotracer-bound Rs in SCZ, demonstrating greater DA release. DA release increment correlated to aggravated psychosis
11C raclopride has D3 binding. Amphetamine-induced DA release is not a physiologically similar situation to SCZ, and argued that effect could have been due to differences in amphetamine metabolism or its ability to enter the CNS - it is artificial - how much can you read into this? A
Abi-Dargham 2000
used SPECT with [123I]-IBZM to measure baseline dopamine occupancy of D2 receptors. o Schizophrenic patients and control subjects were administered alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (TH inhibitor) to deplete endogenous dopamine. The decrease in receptor occupancy was significantly greater for schizophrenic patients (19% compared to 9%), indicating greater receptor occupancy at baseline, which supports the mesolimbic hyperdopaminergic theory of schizophrenia.
Assumes the magnitude of DA depletion is the same between SCZ and ctrl
Howes et al. 2012
meta-analysis of 44 in vivo studies with 600 pts and 600 controls looking at striatal dopamine with PET “Around a doubling of synaptic DA, and of D2 R occupancy in pts compared to controls They found that there was a highly sig elevation in presynaptic dopaminergic function in SCZ (dopamine synthesis capacity, basline DA levels and dopamine release). These are not targeted by current drug treatments, which primarily act to block D2 Rs - fail to target these abnormalities. Need future drugs to focus on the control ofpresynaptic DA synthesis and release capacity”
Abi-Dargham 2002
PET study measuring selective D1 receptor availability with labelled D1 antagonist. confirmed D1R increased throughout cortex in SCZ, only statistically sig difference was in dorsolateral PFC; thought to be increased as compensatory phenomenon due to DA deficit. May be that this upregulation is not functional due to lack of stimulation by endogenous DA and so PFC-mediated deficits (underlying negative + cognitive symptoms)
Slifstein et al. 2015
PET has only recently become sensitive enough to detect PFC DA alterations. This is the first in vivo example of this. They looked a 20 schizophrenics and 20 controls. They did PET imaging using 11[C]-GLB457 radiotracer which binds to both D2 and D3 receptors. They gave a bolus of amphetamine to each group (for DA release). Demonstrate that DA release is significantly reduced in DL PFC of SCZ.
- Egan 2001
They looked at COMT (enzyme involved in DA degradation) – specifically a common functional polymorphism, that accounts for 4-fold variation in enzyme activity and dopamine catabolism. Compared the presence of this to performance on Wisconsin Card Sorting test of executive function in 175 SCZ, 219 unaffected siblings, 55 controls. Found the genotype explained 4% of variance of WCS score (p=0.001); low activity Met allele predicted enhanced cognitive performance. Then examined COMT genotype on physiological PFC response using fMRI and Met allele predicted more efficient physiological response in PFC. They did a family-based association analysis and found that there was significant transmission of the Val allele to SCZ offspring (not the met allele) o So overall more COMT activity = more prefrontal DA catabolism = worse WCS score (impaired prefrontal cognition) and reduced PFC signalling (= means association with)
Kellendonk et al 2006
- generated transgenic mouse model in which D2R expression could be selectively upregulated in the striatum, mimicking DA hyperactivity
- Mice had decreased DA turnover in the PFC, and performed poorly in PFC-dependent cognitive tasks that persisted even long after the transgene had been turned off
- Also get D1R upregulation in these mice, as PET studies in humans SCZs show you do, but limited D1R antagonist trials show lack of efficacy or symptoms worsening
- Idea that excessive DA during development somehow causes cortical DA insufficiency and cognitive deficit, hence D2R antagonist in early adulthood have no effect on cognitive or negative symptoms
Limitations
- No direct link to cog deficits (could have used opto/chemgen to activate/inhibit). Also going from one transgenic mouse model to this is the core pathology of SCZ - bit of a leap.
Carlsson et al 2006
Came up with DA deficit hypothesis
Kapur 2003
Came up w aberrant salience theory
Olney and Farber 1995
put forward first NMDAR dysfunction hypothesis of SCZ, showing that animals given NMDAR antagonists developed neurotoxic changes in cortical brain regions, which they suggested were similar to reduction in brain volume seen in pts w SCZ. AMPAR antagonists could block downstream effects of NMDAR antagonist on neurotoxicity, hypothesising that glutamate release might underlie neurotoxic effects
Moghaddam et al. 1997
confirmed this w microdialysis of healthy rats w subanaesthetic doses of ketamine, which they found increased extracellular glutamate in the PFC and found that this also impaired cognitive functions and produced motor sterotypy. This increase in extracellular glutamate had functional significance because blockade of AMPA receptors reduced these motoric and cognitive detriments of NMDAR blockade. Therefore, NMDA antagonsits appeared to increase glutamate release at some synapses which then abnormally increased glutamate neurotransmission at non-NMDAR, in particular AMPA receptors. These results suggests that the behavioural conseqeucnes of NMDAR deficiency is not due to a generalised glutamate hypofunction but dysregulation of glutamate neurotransmission that may involve NMDAR hypofunciton and excessive activity of non-NMDA receptors
Moghaddam 98
Group II mGluRs are autoreceptors that inhibit glutamate release. They gave group II agonist prior to PCP (NMDA antagonist). Microdialysis = increase glutamate in PFC and motor sterotypy and decrease in cog performance. All reversed by the agonist and confirmed to not be reduced by a reduction in DA
General animal model stuff (stereotypy not scz), furthermore, although in 2007 clinical trial mGlu2/3 agonists were shown to improve both positive and negative symtpoms, future trials have failed to show effect - maybe its to do with different subcategories of scz?
Krystal 1994
19pts. Given either placebo or 2 doses of K (0.1&0.5mg/kg). Produced behaviours similar to + and - symptoms (e.g. increases in hallucinations nand impaired in WCST so frontal dysfunction)
Recruitment through adverstising (homogenous population), not causal, ketamine is short-term but scz develops over a long period of time - different mechanisms?
mGlu2/3 agonists
Patil 2007 - phase II clinical trial - mGlu2/3 agonists were shown to improve both positive and negative symtpoms, future phase III trials have failed to show effect - maybe its to do with different subcategories of scz? Was only assessed for 4 weeks - AP drugs would need longer.Liu 2012 later showed that this agonist was only effective in pts with a specific SNP in the 5-HT2A receptor - although this second one was candidate gene approach (picked genes to investigate depending on their association with the pharmacological action) - maybe there is even more subcategorisation?
Mohn 1999
Generated mice expressing only 5% of the normal levels of NR1 subunit of NMDA - survive to adulthood and display behavioural abnormalities, including increased motor activity and deficits in social and sexual interactions, similar to those seen in pharmcologically-induced animal models. These can be ameliorated through treatment with APs (cloz and halo). No changes in DA with microdialysis (only glutamate and not DA) Supports model where reduced NMDAR activity causes SCZ-like behaviour
Maybe microdialysis at the time was not specific enough to pick up the D, could have used FSCV. Havent seen NR1 in GWAS. Used a homologus recombination technique which could lead to ectopic recombination in other places. Did global NDMA hypofuction, rather than in specific circuits. The mice also showed autism-related behaviooural deficits (maybe not representative of scz)
- Belforte et al. 2010
Built on previous studies (Mohn 99 in particular) .Transgenic mice using Cre-loxP, in which the essential NR1 subunit of the NMDAR was eliminated in 40-50% of cortical and hippocampal INs in early postnatal development.
Direct SCZ-related symptoms emerged after adolescence (including 1 novelty-induced hyperlocomotion, 2 mating and nest-building deficits, and 3 anhedonia-like and 4 anxiety-like behaviours). Also showed reduction in GAD67 - potential reduction in GABA synthesis - reduction in GABAergic inhibition - cortical disinhibition
not affected à neurodevelopmental hypothesis. Idea that early postnatal inhibition of NMDAR activity could contribute to pathophysiology of SCZ. Also no GAD67 reduction. Early postnatal NMDAR hypofunction in GABAergic IN is needed for SCZ-like behaviour
Limitations
1) Lack of consensus on altered subunit levels in post-mortem brain studies, so hard to ascertain construct validity (also in genetics), 2) based on expression of behavioural analogues for SCZ in humans, 3) which subtupe of GABA IN? 3) do both cortical and hippocampal INs play a role? (both were targetted), 4) only 50% of INs were even targetted