Animal models/60s/extra info Flashcards
Construct validity
different definitions -
essentially - how well does the underlying manipulation reflect pathology
- how much the model is depresssion
Pierro - aetiological basis
Face validity
how well does the animal model mimic phenotype and pathological changes seen in disease - degree of similarity between the model and the disorder.
how much the model mimics depression
Pierro - recapitulation of external features of NDDs
Predictive validity
how well does the model respond to treatments for given disease, but some authors also use it in a broader sense, including a models aptitude to predict some specific markers of disease
How will structure my essay? (animal models)
- Discussing the insights they can give use into disease pathology
- The aspects of disease pathology they can and cannot model
- The aspects of behavioural outcome they can and cannot model
- And finally considering alternatives such as IPSCs
Seok et al. (2013)
- conducted a large-scale study that highlights how poorly mouse models of inflammation reflect the human condition
- This involved analysing the gene expression profiles of leukocytes in mouse models and human subjects that were elicited by inflammatory challenges (including trauma, sepsis and endotoxemia).
- authors found that the expression profiles amongst humans across these diverse conditions were similar, suggesting a common pathway in humans independent of the initiating stress
- However, the expression profile in the corresponding mice models differed significantly from each other, and from the human data
- In fact, the correlations of the gene changes between humans and mice was equivalent to what would be expected by random chance
- This may explain why so many of the clinical trials for these disorders fail, and emphasises the need for more human-representative models, such as the DRAG mouse model (humanised mice - express human HLA-II)
- There were however caveats to this work, for example they did only investigate one strain of mice, different microbiotal compositions in species could have influenced the profiles, and humans received medical care that wasn’t accounted for
Issues with chronic social defeat
- Tsankova 2006 – increase in BDNF III and IV – but generally cant model chronic social defeat in female animals, although depression is twice as common in female humans
Issues w FST
- Immobility could be from shock of being dropped into the water, or could instead demonstrate learning or habituation (would therefore be a positive behavioural adaptation)
Issues with TST
- Can be weeks before a noticeable effect is observed in patients who take ADs – TST measures one AD dose for 5-6 mins
Issues w MWM
- – to evaluate impared cognitive function – have to remember where the platform is
- Has been shown that differences in performance are dependent on differences in thigmotaxis between rodents – tendency to stay close to the edges
- Differences in spatial memory may only be one causal factor
issues with SA
- Might just be animals’ curiosity
Discuss pre vs post dictive validitiy
- Predictive validity – ability to predict response to new drugs
- Postdictive validity – sensitivity to existing drugs
- The vast majority of studies have relied on a limited subset of tests
Handley 1993
-
1993 for example and show different findings depending on setup for SSRIs, but are consistent for benzodiazepines.
- EPM always works/is consistent for benzos
- For 5-HT targeting drugs it depends on light levels
- This is concerning given that several SSRIs are approved for various anxiety disorders
- Shows that many preclinical models lack postdictive validity
- Cav – they only tested 2 light intensities – would have been better to test a range
- Mouse defence test battery
- Model defence-related disorders such as anxiety or panic
- Incudes several measures of mouse defensiveness in response to the test
Stuart 2013
- developed affective bias task
- animal is given two independent learning experiences and then asked ‘which do you prefer?’ during a preference test (in this case association between digging cue and fixed food value) – mouse digs in 2 places, will get reward in either
- Following learning, present animals with both previously rewarded substrates during pref test - resulting choice bias score is then calculated to determine if the treatment has induced a positive or negative bias
- idea behind the task is that the animal will re-activate its memory for the reward associated with each substrate and then bias its responding based on the relative value it attributes to each experience
- Replicated affective bias changes seen in humans from acute SSRIs - suggesting translational and predictive validity
- Pharmacological interventions producing negative affective bias in humans also did so in rats.
- Good predictive and translational validity - however further work is required to see if this task has construct validity
Discuss benzos and issues
· Benzodiazepines - discovered in 60s, still prescribed today for anxiety disorders
§ GABA potentiators
§ Serendipitous discovery
· Sedative, motor incoordination, dizziness, anterograde amnesia. Real worry is risk of tolerance, dependence and OD. Usually cause serious OD in the presence of other CNS depressants, particularly alcohol - respiratory depression