gen scz Flashcards

1
Q

i. Karunakaran 2019 (Nature)

A
  1. Identified the protein-protein interactions (interactome) of scz associated genes.
  2. Looked at which drugs target the interactome and whether they show anticorrelation with the transcriptomic signature seen in the disease (transcriptomics)
  3. Identified a shortlist of 12 potential drugs (top 3 were cromoglicic acid, acetazolamide and cinnarizine).
  4. No actual screening to see if such drugs alter scz phenotypes – could have done animal model for each repurposed drugs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. Lintunen 2021
A

longitudinal prospective study showed patients on calcium channel blockers had reduction in scz rehopsitalisation (although concomitant AP was allowed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

iv. Yoshimizu et al 2015

A

used iPSCs to look at functional phenotype associated with an SNP identified in GWAS

  1. Generated iPSCs with the allele and without
  2. Found higher expression of CACNA1C in those carrying, confirmed by higher VGCC in those carrying by whole cell recording
  3. Although iPSCs not same as in vivo
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

v. Yilmaz 2021

A
  1. Overexpressed human C4A in mice
  2. IHC and behavioural testing
  3. Increased microglial engulfment and reduced synapse density, shown both in the visual system and the PFC
  4. In the PFC this was slow and cumulative – maybe this is why scz develops later on
  5. These mice also had increased social withdrawal and deficits in working memory
  6. Mice without the C4 had normal cortical synapses
  7. Maybe C4 could be a therapeutic target?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Identified the protein-protein interactions (interactome) of scz associated genes.
  2. Looked at which drugs target the interactome and whether they show anticorrelation with the transcriptomic signature seen in the disease (transcriptomics)
  3. Identified a shortlist of 12 potential drugs (top 3 were cromoglicic acid, acetazolamide and cinnarizine).
  4. No actual screening to see if such drugs alter scz phenotypes – could have done animal model for each repurposed drugs
A

i. Karunakaran 2019 (Nature)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

longitudinal prospective study showed patients on calcium channel blockers had reduction in scz rehopsitalisation (although concomitant AP was allowed)

A
  1. Lintunen 2021
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

used iPSCs to look at functional phenotype associated with an SNP identified in GWAS

  1. Generated iPSCs with the allele and without
  2. Found higher expression of CACNA1C in those carrying, confirmed by higher VGCC in those carrying by whole cell recording
  3. Although iPSCs not same as in vivo
A

iv. Yoshimizu et al 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Overexpressed human C4A in mice
  2. IHC and behavioural testing
  3. Increased microglial engulfment and reduced synapse density, shown both in the visual system and the PFC
  4. In the PFC this was slow and cumulative – maybe this is why scz develops later on
  5. These mice also had increased social withdrawal and deficits in working memory
  6. Mice without the C4 had normal cortical synapses
  7. Maybe C4 could be a therapeutic target?
A

v. Yilmaz 2021

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly