Scheurman, Whistleblowing as Civil disobedience Flashcards
How does the author characterize Edward Snowden’s actions?
The author argues that Snowden’s actions qualify as civil disobedience, as they meet the criteria outlined in sophisticated political thinking on the subject.
What specific acts of law-breaking did Snowden commit?
Snowden violated the government’s classified information non-disclosure agreement by leaking classified information about the NSA’s surveillance programs.
What is the author’s view of Snowden’s decision to seek asylum outside the United States?
While acknowledging the conventional wisdom that civil disobedients should accept punishment, the author argues that Snowden was justified in seeking asylum due to the Espionage Act’s vague language, the US government’s aggressive prosecution and the lack of sufficient legal protections for whistleblowers.
How does Snowden’s case relate to the broader history of civil disobedience?
The author compares Snowden’s actions to those of Thoreau, Gandhi, and King, noting similarities in their motivations and strategies, while also highlighting the unique global context of Snowden’s actions.
How does the author connect Snowden’s case to the concept of globalization?
Snowden’s actions highlight the globalized nature of contemporary politics and law. His case underscores the need for a stronger global legal and human rights system, particularly to protect whistleblowers and hold powerful states accountable.
How does the author justify Snowden’s violation of the law?
The author argues that Snowden’s actions were motivated by a belief that the NSA’s surveillance programs violated fundamental rights and laws, including the US Constitution and international human rights law.
What are the key elements of the debate surrounding whether civil disobedients should accept punishment?
The author presents arguments both for and against the acceptance of punishment. Those in favor often cite respect for the rule of law and the need to demonstrate sincerity. Critics argue that punishment may not always be necessary to achieve those aims and that it can be counterproductive in cases where the legal system is itself flawed.
