Rawls on Civil Disobedience Flashcards
Summary
This excerpt from John Rawls’s A Theory of Justice defines civil disobedience. Rawls distinguishes it from other forms of political protest, emphasizing its characteristics as nonviolent, public, and conscientious. He argues that it is justified only under specific circumstances where fundamental principles of justice are violated. The text examines the relationship between civil disobedience and a just constitutional system, highlighting its role in promoting social change. It carefully considers the limits and appropriateness of this form of resistance.
How does Rawls define civil disobedience?
Civil disobedience is defined as a public, nonviolent, conscientious, and political act contrary to law. It is usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in law or policies of the government, but it operates within a just democratic regime that is just but may have specific injustices. [1]
What is the role of “conscientiousness and sincerity” in civil disobedience, according to Rawls? [2]
Rawls emphasizes that acts of civil disobedience must be motivated by a sincere belief that a law or policy is unjust and incompatible with the shared conception of justice. The motivation should not be personal gain but rather appealing to the majority’s sense of justice. [2]
What is the significance of publicity in acts of civil disobedience? [3]
Publicity is essential because it appeals to the public’s sense of justice, aiming to persuade the majority to recognize and rectify injustice. It also distinguishes the act from private resistance or covert disobedience. [3]
Why does Rawls emphasize that civil disobedience is a political act primarily addressed to the majority? [4]
It is directed at the majority because it appeals to their shared sense of justice. It seeks to persuade them to recognize and rectify the injustice. It assumes the majority is generally well-intentioned but may be unaware of or complicit in the specific injustice. [4]
What is the connection between civil disobedience and the concept of a shared conception of justice? [5]
Civil disobedience presupposes a shared conception of justice. This means that citizens broadly agree on the principles of justice. The act challenges specific laws or policies perceived as violating these shared principles. It seeks to uphold the broader conception of justice. [5]
What is the role of fidelity to law in civil disobedience? [6]
While breaking the law, civil disobedience demonstrates fidelity to law by accepting the consequences and acknowledging the legitimacy of the legal system. This reinforces a commitment to the rule of law while addressing specific injustices. [6]
