SAQ - studies Flashcards
background for Milner’s H.M.
- longitudinal case study
- HM hit by a bike when he was 7 -> serious brain injury
- epileptic attacks began at 10, assumed to be connected with accident
- frequent seizures at 27 to a point where he couldn’t lead a normal life, no medications helped -> consent of HM & his family, neurosurgeon Dr. Scoville performed an experimental surgery of removing tissue from medial temporal lobe (including hippocampus) on both sides of HM’s brain
aim for Milner’s H.M.
better understand the effects that the surgery had had on patient HM
procedure for Milner’s H.M.
Dr. Milner used method triangulation:
- Psychometric testing: IQ testing
- Direct observation of behaviour
- Interviews with both HM and with family members
- Cognitive testing: Memory recall & learning tasks
- MRI scan later to determine the extent of the damage done to HM’s brain
result for Milner’s H.M.
- IQ test: no general intellectual impairment
- retrograde amnesia right after surgery -> eventually diminished
- mainly suffered from anterograde amnesia: unable to remember the faces of people he met after the operation
- asking what he just had for lunch -> could not remember
- could not acquire new episodic knowledge
- could not acquire new semantic knowledge (episodic & semantic: declarative memory)
- suggests that removed brain structures are important for the transfer of information from short-term to long-term memory
- cognitive map test: could draw picture of floor plan of his new home
- this memory type (implicit memory) is not encoded the same way as declarative memory
- able to carry on normal conversation, recall number 584 15 minutes later by constant rehearsal -> had capacity for working memory
- short-term memory is not stored in the hippocampus
- wasn’t able to recall the number after the task was over
- knew how to mow a lawn, improvement in star mirror-drawing task -> procedural memories (implicit memory) were well maintained
- never remembered learning the star drawing skill
- able to retain some memories for events that happened long before his surgery -> had long-term memory
- medial temporal region is not the site of permanent storage but rather plays a role in the organization and permanent storage of memories elsewhere in the brain
- Corkin in 1992 & 2003 did MRI scan of HM’s brain to see the extent of damage -> parts of temporal lobe including hippocampus had the most damage
- explains the problem of transferring short-term memory to long-term memory as hippocampus is the area where the neurotransmitter acetylcholine is believed to play an important role in learning and formation of memories
- longitudial case study: Dr. Milner studied HM until he died in 2008, for over 50 years
- holistic, retrospective, cannot be replicated, high ecological validity
background for Draganski’s juggling study
- experimental field study
aim for Draganski’s juggling study
to see whether learning a new skill (juggling) would have an effect on participants’ brain
procedure for Draganski’s juggling study
- participants: 24 volunteers between the ages of 20 and 24, 21 females & 3 males
- were non-jugglers at the start of the study
- had MRI scan at the start -> served as base rate for grey matter & brain structure
- participants randomly allocated into one of two conditions: jugglers (12) / non-jugglers (12)
- those in juggling condition: were taught a 3-ball cascade juggling routine, asked to practice the routine & notify researchers when they had mastered it -> second MRI scan -> told not to juggle -> final MRI scan 3 months later
- those in non-juggling condition: served as control group
- used Voxel-based Morphometry (VBM) to analyze the MRI scans to determine if there was a significant difference in neural density (grey matter) in the brains of jugglers vs. non-jugglers
result of Draganski’s juggling study
- baseline scans: no significant regional differences in grey matter between two conditions
- end of first part of study: jugglers showed significantly larger amount of grey matter in the mid-temporal area in both hemispheres (associated with visual memory)
- appears that juggling relies more on visual memory than procedural memory
- 3 months after participants stopped juggling: amount of grey matter in these parts of brain decreased
- no change over the duration of study in non-juggling group
background for Antanova’s anera task injection study
true experiment
aim for Antanova’s arena task injection study
to see whether scopolamine affects hippocampal activity in the creation of spatial memory
procedure for Antanova’s arena task injection study
- sample of 20 healthy male adults with mean age of 28 years old
- used double blind procedure: participants were randomly allocated into one of two conditions & injected with either scopolamine or placebo 70 -90 minutes before experiment
- participants put into fMRI -> scanned while playing “Arena task” (complex virtual reality game in which researchers observe participants’ ability to create spatial memory)
- goal for participants: navigate around an “arena” to reach a pole
- after learning the pole’s location -> blank screen for 30 seconds while participants were told to actively rehearse how to get to the pole
- when area reappears: participants at new starting point, need to use their spatial memory to determine how to get to the pole
- participants were first trained in the game to make sure they were comfortable with using joystick & they understood the game -> took part in experiment
- participants’ brain activity was measured for 6 trials
- participants returned after 3-4 weeks and redid the test, receiving the opposite treatment to the original study <- repeated measures design (eliminates effect of participant variability)
result of Antanova’s arena task injection study
- when participants were injected with scopolamine, they demonstrated a significant reduction in activation of hippocampus compared to when they received a placebo
- acetylcholine could play a key role in encoding of spatial memories in humans
- higher error rate in scopolamine group but no significant difference
- significant difference in activity in hippocampus
- study was counter-balanced: some did scopolamine condition first while others did placebo condition first -> controls for researcher bias
- during debriefing: several participants expressed that they felt stressed (bc of injection of unfamiliar drug / fMRI enclosure) -> could’ve affected the working of hippocampus since stress may interfere with memory encoding
background for Newcomer’s cortisol pill study
true experiment
aim for Newcomer’s cortisol pill study
investigate whether high levels of stress hormone cortisol interfere with verbal declarative memory
procedure for Newcomer’s cortisol pill study
- all participants were employees/students at Washington University Medical Center
- given clinical interview with a physician -> excluded from sample if they were pregnant, had history of mental illness, had suffered from head trauma or had suffered from illness that had been treated with corticosteroids
- double blind laboratory experiment: neither researcher doing the study nor participants know the specific type of treatment each participant receives until the experiment is over
- participants were matched for gender & age to one of three conditions:
- condition 1: high level of cortisol -> given a tablet containing 160mg of cortisol on each day of the four-day experiment
- this dose of cortisol produces blood levels similar to those seen in ppl experiencing major stress event
- condition 2: low level of cortisol -> given a table containing 40mg of cortisol per day
- this dose is similar to amount of cortisol circulating in the bloodstream of ppl undergoing minor surgical procedures
- condition 3: placebo group -> given placebo tablets, done to have a control group
- condition 1: high level of cortisol -> given a tablet containing 160mg of cortisol on each day of the four-day experiment
- all participants were asked to listen & recall a prose paragraph
- each day participants were given different piece of prose with same level of difficulty
- tested 3 times
- all participants were first tested before taking any cortisol -> no significant difference between groups
- important control to make sure that at baseline, individual differences won’t be a confounding variable for the study
- participants were tested one day after taking the pill & then again four days later, another test six days later to ensure that there were no long-term effects of treatment on participants