Samuel And Bryant (1984) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Age and features of pre-operational stage?

A

2-7years
Develops language skills
Has ability to mentally represent objects and events
Egocentric and cannot conserve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Age and features of sensori-motor stage?

A

0-2years
Develops motor skills
Develops a sense of subject permanence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Age and features of concrete operational stage?

A

7-11years
Ability to decentre and conserve
Can think about the world how it is, but not how it might be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Age and features of formal operational stage?

A

11+years
Capable of forming and testing hypotheses
Understands rules of formal logic
Able to reason about abstract concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the aim of the experiment?

A

To challenge Piaget’s findings by changing the method used to investigate conservation in children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many participants were there? Where were they from?

A

252 boys and girls

Sample was drawn from primary schools and playgroups in Crediton, Devon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the age range of the sample?

A

5-8.5 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How were the participants split/divided?

A

Split into 4 groups of 63 by mean ages of 5y3m, 6y3m, 7y3m, 8y3m
These groups were then divided into 3 groups of 21, matched to control for age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What kind of experiment was Samuel and Bryant?

A

Laboratory, quasi experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the three independent variables?

A

Age of participants
Task conditions
Material used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Task conditions (IV) - standard condition?

A

Children are asked about the quantity of the material pre and post transformation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Task conditions (IV) - one question condition?

A

Same as the standard condition, children see the transformation but are only asked one question, post transformation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Task conditions (IV) - fixed array condition?

A

Control condition

The child does not see the transformation, only sees the post transformation material and is asked the question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why was Piaget’s standard condition used in the experiment?

A

To show that children don’t always fail the standard condition because they cannot conserve
Allows direct comparisons with their one question condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why was the fixed array condition used? (Control condition)

A

To assess whether children who answered the post transformation question correctly had done so from using information from the pre-transformation display

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the experimental design?

A

Independent measures design

16
Q

What three materials were used in the tasks?

A

Volume - liquid
Mass - play dough
Number - counters

17
Q

Procedure for volume?

A

Standard and one question: shown two identical glasses of liquid. One glass was poured into a taller narrower glass
Fixed array: only saw the two different sized glasses of liquid

18
Q

Procedure for mass?

A

Standard and one question: shown two identical balls of play dough. One ball was squished into a pancake or a sausage
Fixed array: only saw the two different shapes of play dough

19
Q

Procedure for number?

A

Standard and one question: saw two identical rows of six plastic counters. One row was then spread out
Fixed array: only saw the two different length rows

20
Q

How many trials for each material did the children do?

A

Four trials for each material (12 total)

The order was systematically varied for each child

21
Q

What kind of data was collected?

A

Quantitative data was collected

22
Q

What was the dependent variable?

A

Number of errors made by the children

23
Q

What were the findings?

A

One question condition was easiest
Fewer errors were made by children aged 8 in all conditions compared to children aged 5
Fixed array produced the highest number of errors in all age groups
Volume produced the most errors

24
Q

Conclusion?

A

Samuel and Bryant were right to question Piaget’s use of two questions - Piaget was confusing children and producing demand characteristics
Ability to conserve develops with age