SALE Flashcards
If goods have been delivered to buyer pursuant to sale or return contract, the
Risk of loss for the goods passed to the buyer.
Bell Co. owned 20 engines which it deposited in a public warehouse on May 5, receiving a negotiable warehouse receipt in its name. Bell sold the engines to Spark Corp. On which of the following dates did the risk of loss transfer from Bell to Spark?
June 13 - Bell negotiated the warehouse receipt to Spark.
June 11 - Saprk signed a contract to buy the engines from Bell for $19,000. delivery was to be at the warehouse.
June 14 - Spark received delivery of the engines at the warehouse.
June 12 - Spark paid for the engines.
June 13-Bell negotiated the warehouse receipt to Spark.
An oral agreement concerning the sale of goods entered without consideration is binding if the agreement
Modifies the price in an existing, enforceable contract from $525 to $475.
Ace Auto Sales, Inc. sold Williams a secondhand car for $9,000. One day Williams parked the car in a shopping center parking lot. When Williams returned to the car, Montrose and several policemen were waiting. It turned cut that the car had been stolen from Montrose who was rightfully claiming ownership. Subsequently, the car was returned by Williams to Montase. Williams seeks recourse against Ace Auto Sales who had sold him the car with the disclaimer of “any and all warranties” of the following is correct?
a. Since Ace Auto Salas’ contract of sale disclaimed “any and all warranties” arising in connection with its sale to Williams, Williams must bear the loss.
b. Since Ace Auto and Williams were both innocent of any wrongdoing in connection with the theft of the auto, the loss will rest upon the party ultimately in possession.
c. Ace Auto will bear the loss since a warranty of title in Williams’ favor aase upon the sale of the auto.
d. Had Williams litigated the question of Montrose’s ownership to the auto, he would have won since possession is nine-tenths of the law.
Ace Auto will bear the loss since a warranty of title in Williams’ favor aase upon the sale of the auto.
Calvin Poultry Co. offered to sell Chickenshop 20,000 pounds of chicken at 40 cents per pound under specified delivery terms. Chickenshop accepted the offer as follows: “We accept your offer for 20,000 pounds of chicken at 40 cents per pound per city scale weight certificate.” Which of the following is correct?
a. Chickenshop’s reply constitutes a conditional acceptance, but not counteroffer.
b. A contract was formed on Chickenshop’s terms.
c. A contract was formed on Calvin’s terms.
d. Chickenshop’s reply constitutes a counteroffer and no contract was formed.
A contract was formed on Chickenshop’s terms.
Under the UCC Sales Article, firm offer will be created only if the
Offer is made by merchant in signed writing.
Marvin contracted to purchase goods from Ling. Subsequently, Marvin breached the contract and Ling is seeking to recover the contract price. Ling can recover the price if
Ling has identified the goods to the contract and the circumstances indicate that a reasonable effort to resell the goods at a reasonable price would be to no avail.
Thorn purchased a used entertainment system from Sound Corp. The sales contract stated that the entertainment system was being sold “as is.” Under the Sales Article of the UCC, which of the following statements is(are) correct regarding the seller’s warranty of title and against infringement?
I. Including the term “as is” in the sales contract is adequate communication that the seller is conveying the entertainment system without warranty of title and against infringement.
II. The seller’s warranty of title and against infringement may be disclaimed at any time after the contract is formed.
Neither I or II
To establish a cause of action based on strict liability in tort for personal injuries resulting from using defective product, one of the elements the plaintiff must prove is that the seller (defendant)
Was engaged in the business of selling the product.
Which of the following factors is least important in determining whether manufacturer is strictly liable in tort for defective product?
a. Whether the product caused injuries.
b. The negligence of the manufacturer.
c. Modifications to the product by the wholesaler.
d. The contributory negligence of the plaintiff.
The negligence of the manufacturer.
In general, the UCC Sales Article applies to the sale of
Consumer goods by a nonmerchant
On February I, Nugent Manufacturing, Inc. contracted with Costello Wholesalers to supply Costello with 1,000 integrated circuits. Delivery was called for on May I. On March 15, Nugent notified Costello that it would not perform and that Costello should look elsewhere. Nugent had received a larger and more lucrative contract on February 27, and its capacity was such that it could not fulfill both orders. The facts
Will permit Costello to sue immediately after March 15, even though the performance called for under the contract was not until May 1.
Tint is suing the manufacturer, the wholesaler, and the retailer for bodily injuries caused by snowblower Tint purchased. Under the theory of strict liability
Tint may recover despite the fact that he cannot show that any negligence was involved.
Under the UCC Sales Article, the warranty of title may be excluded by
The seller’s statement that it is selling only such right or title that it has.
Under the UCC, an action for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability by party who sustained personal injuries may be successful against the seller of the product only when
The seller is a merchant with respect to the product involved.
Baker fraudulently induced Able to sell Baker painting for $200. Subsequently, Baker sold the painting for $10,000 to Gold, good-faith purchaser. Able is entitled to
Recover damages from Baker.
Under the UCC Sales Article, which of the following warranties requires the seller to be merchant with respect to the goods being sold in order for the warranty to apply?
a. Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and Implied warranty of merchantability.
b. Neither
c. Implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
d. Implied warranty of merchantability
Implied warranty of merchantability
Gibbeon Manufacturing shipped 300 designer navy blue blazers to Custom Clothing Emporeum. The blazers arrived on Friday, earlier than Custom had anticipated and on an exceptionally busy day for its receiving department. They were perfunctorily examined and sent to a nearby warehouse for storage until needed. On Monday of the following week, upon closer examination, it was discovered that the quality of the linings of the blazers was inferior to that specified in the sales contract. Which of the following is correct insofar as Custom’s rights are concerned?
Custom can reject the blazers upon subsequent discovery of the defects
Moreno Company contracted with a common carrier to have goods transported that she had sold to a customer FOS destination. The contract between the common carrier and Moreno specified in clear terms that liability of the common carrier is limited to $100 per shipment unless a higher limit is chosen by paying more. Moreno did not select a higher limit. The goods, worth $900, were destroyed in transit. Which of the following is not true?
The clause limiting liability to a $100 limit is invalid as against public policy.