CPAP Flashcards

1
Q

Hoover is holder in due course of check which was originally payable to the order of Nelson or bearer and has the following endorsements on its back:

Nelson (signature)

Pay to the order of Maxwell

Duffy (signature)

Without Recourse

Maxwell (signature)

Howard (signature)

Which of the following statements about the check is correct?

a. It was order paper in Howard’s hands
b. It was originally order paper.
c. Duffy’s signature was not necessary for the check to be negotiated.
d. Maxwell’s signature was not necessary for it to be negotiated.

A

Duffy’s signature was not necessary for the check to be negotiated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Johnson lost a check that he had received for professional services rendered. The instrument on its face was payable to Johnson’s order. He had endorsed it on the back by signing his name and printing “for deposit only” above his name. Assuming the check is found by Alcatraz, a dishonest person who attempts to cash it, which of the following is correct?

a. If Alcatraz simply signs his name beneath Johnson’s endorsement, he can convert it into bearer paper and holder in due course would take free of the restriction.
b. The endorsement prevents further transfer or negotiation by anyone.
c. Any transferee of the instrument must pay or apply any value given by him for the instrument consistent with the endorsement.
d. The endorsement is a blank endorsement and holder in due course who cashed it for Alcatraz would prevail.

A

Any transferee of the instrument must pay or apply any value given by him for the instrument consistent with the endorsement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In order to negotiate bearer paper, one must

A

Deliver the paper.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

On August I, Titan wrote a personal check that was drawn on First Plymouth Bank and made payable to Brass. Brass, on August 2, presented the check to First Plymouth Bank for payment, which was refused. Who had primary liability on this check?

A

No one on August I or August 2.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which of the following will not constitute value in determining whether person is holder in due course?

a. The performance of services rendered the payee of a negotiable instrument who endorses it in payment for services.
b. The taking of a negotiable instrument for a future consideration.
c. The giving of one’s own negotiable instrument in connection with the purchase of another negotiable instrument.
d. The taking of a negotiable instrument as security for loan.

A

The taking of a negotiable instrument for a future consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Archer has in his possession a bearer negotiable instrument. He took it by negotiation from Perth who had stolen it from Cox’s office along with cash and other property. The robbery of Cox’s office had received appropriate coverage in the local papers in the area in which both Archer and Cox reside. Archer did not know that Perth had stolen the instrument when he purchased it at a 20% discount. Cox refuses to pay and Archer has commenced legal action asserting that he is a holder in due course. Which of the following statements is correct?

a. The discount in and of itself prevents Archer from qualifying as holder in due course or at least prevents him from so qualifying as to the 20%.
b. Archer is a holder in due course and will prevail.
c. Archer is prevented from qualifying as a holder in due course because there had been general notice published in the community about the robbery.
d. Even if all other requisites are satisfied, Archer’s title is defective in that there was no delivery by Cox of the instrument.

A

Archer is a holder in due course and will prevail.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Smith buys a TV set from the ABC Appliance Store and pays for the set with a check. Later in the day Smith finds a better model for the same price at another store. Smith immediately calls ABC toying to cancel the sale. ABC tells Smith that they are holding him to the sale and have negotiated the check to their Wholesaler, Glenn Company, as a partial payment on inventory purchases. Smith telephones his bank, the Union Trust Sank, and orders the bank to stop payment on the check. Which of the following statements is correct?

a. Glenn cannot hold Smith liable on the check.
b. Union Trust is not bound or liable for Smith’s stop payment order unless the order is placed in writing.
c. If Glenn can prove it is a holder in due course, the drawee bank, Union Trust, must honor Smith’s check.
d. If Union Trust mistakenly pays Smith’s check 2 days after receiving the stop order, the bank will not be liable.

A

If Union Trust mistakenly pays Smith’s check 2 days after receiving the stop order, the bank will not be liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

On April 2, Harris agreed to sell a computer to Cross for $390. At the time of delivery, Cross gave Harris $90 and a written instrument, signed by Cross, in which Cross promised to pay Harris the balance on April 20. The instrument also made a reference to the sale of the computer. Under the UCC Negotiable Instruments Article, the instrument is a

A

Promissory note.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Train issued a note payable on June 1 to Blake in payment of contracted services that Blake was to perform. Blake endorsed the note “pay to bearer” and delivered it to Reed in satisfaction of a debt owed Reed. On June 3, Reed presented the note for payment to Train. Train refused to pay Reed on the note because S\Blake had not yet performed the services. Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, must Train pay Reed?

A

Yes, Train has to pay Reed because Reed was a holder in due course.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Kirk made a check payable to Haskin’s order for a debt she owed on open account. Haskin negotiated the check by blank endorsement to Carlson who deposited it in his checking account. The bank returned the check with the notation that payment was refused due to insufficient funds. Kirk is insolvent. Under the circumstances

A

If there is paper presentment, and notice is properly given by Carlson to Haskin, Carlson may recover the amount of the check from Haskin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, a holder in due course in a nonconsumer transaction takes a negotiable instrument free from which of the following defenses that may be asserted by a party with whom the holder in due course had not dealt?

A

Breach of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

To be holder in due course, the holder must fulfill certain requirements. Which of the following does not fulfill the value requirement?

a. The holder promises in writing to perform specified services within 6 months.
b. The holder exchanges the negotiable instrument for another negotiable instrument.
c. The holder takes possession of the negotiable instrument as collateral of another debt.
d. The holder gives $930 for a promissory note with a face amount of $1,000.

A

The holder promises in writing to perform specified services within 6 months.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In connection with check and promissory note, which of the following is correct?

a. A promissory note may only be made payable to the order of a named payee.
b. A check may be made payable upon the happening of an event uncertain as to the time of occurrence without affecting its negotiability.
c. A promissory note may only be payable at a stated time in order to meet the requirements for negotiability.
d. A check may be made payable to the order of the drawer or to bearer.

A

A check may be made payable to the order of the drawer or to bearer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Jane Lane, a sole proprietor, has in her possession several checks which she received from her customers. Lane is concerned about the safety of the checks since she believes that many of them are bearer paper which may be cashed without endorsement. The checks in Lane’s possession will be considered order paper rather than bearer paper if they were made payable (in the drawer’s handwriting) to the order of

A

Bearer, and endorsed by Ken Kent making them payable to Jane Lane.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The following note was executed by Elizabeth Quinton on April 17, year I, and delivered to Ian Wolf:

(Face)

                                                       April 17, year 1

On demand, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of Ian Wolf

Seven Thousand and 00/100

Dollars Elizabeth Ouinton

                                                         Elizabeth Quinton

(Back)

Ian Wolf

Ian Wolf

George Vernon

Samuel Thorn

Samuel Thorn

Alan Yule

George Vernon

Alan Yule

In sequence, beginning with Wolf’s receipt of the note, this note is properly characterized as what type of commercial paper?

A

Order, bearer, order, order, bearer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Watson made out a negotiable promissory note to the order of Kerrigan as payment for a computer that Kerrigan promised to deliver that afternoon. Kerrigan immediately endorsed the note over to his daughter as a gift. Kerrigan’s daughter was unaware that her father failed to deliver the computer until she tried to get payment on the note from Watson. Which of the following is correct?

a. Watson need not pay on the note because he has a personal defense.
b. Kerrigan’s daughter qualifies as a holder in due course because she was unaware of the nondelivery.
c. Watson need not pay on the note because the holder is a close relative of the person who failed to deliver.
d. Watson need not pay on the note because he has a real defense.

A

Watson need not pay on the note because he has a personal defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Which of the following on the face of an otherwise negotiable instrument will affect the instrument’s negotiability?

a. The instrument is postdated.
b. The instrument contains a promise to provide additional collateral if there is decrease in value of the existing collateral.
c. The instrument is payable at a definite time subject to an acceleration clause in the event of a default.
d. The instrument is payable 6 months after the death of the maker.

A

The instrument is payable 6 months after the death of the maker.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Union Co. possesses the following Instrument:

Holt, MT $4,000 April I5, year 1

Fifty days after date, or sooner, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of

                 Union Co

                 Four Thousand dollars

                 Salem Sank Holt MT

  At           Ten percent interest per annum.

This instrument is secured by the maker’s business inventory. EASY, INC

                                                    By Thomas Foy

                                                    Thomas Foy, President

Assuming all other requirement of negotiability are satisfied, this instrument is

A

Negotiable because it is payable in a fixed amount in money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Mask stole one of Bloom’s checks. The check was already signed by Bloom and made payable to Duval. The check was drawn on united Trust Company. Mask forged Duval’s signature on the back of the check and cashed the check at the Corner Check Cashing Company which in turn deposited it with its bank, Town National Bank. Town National proceeded to collect on the check from United. None of the parties mentioned was negligent. Who will bear the loss assuming the amount cannot be recovered from Mask?

A

Corner Check Cashing Company.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Dunbar is the holder and payee of check. He takes it to the Federal Bank upon which it was drawn and has it certified. Which of the following is correct?

a. Prior to certification of the check, Federal is only secondarily liable on the check.
b. If Federal refuses to certify the check, the check will be dishonored.
c. Federal is obligated to certify the check as long as there are adequate funds in the account.
d. After certification of the check, Federal is primarily liable and the drawer is discharged on the check.

A

After certification of the check, Federal is primarily liable and the drawer is discharged on the check.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

A trade acceptance usually

A

Provides that the drawer is also the payee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Karr transferred a negotiable instrument payable to his order to Watson for value. Karr did not endorse the instrument. As result of the transfer, Watson

A

Is entitled to an unqualified endorsement by Karr.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Harper made out a draft which indicated Brush was the payee. It was drawn on Murdock Sank. The draft was payable 14 days after arush delivers all the computers listed in a contract between Harper and Brush. Does this payment term on the draft destroy negotiability?

A

Yes, because the draft is not payable at a definite time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Clarkson received a check from Shipley which was incomplete as to the amount. The check was given as payment in advance on the purchase of 100 CB radios. The amount was left blank because Clarkson had the right to substitute other CB models if available for those ordered, which would change the price. It was agreed that in no event would the purchase price exceed $1,800. Desperate for cash, Clarkson wrongfully substituted much more expensive CB radios thereby increasing the purchase price to $2,200. Clarkson then negotiated the check to Marshall, one of his suppliers. Clarkson filled in the $2,200 in Marshall’s presence showing him the shipping order and invoice applicable to the sale to Shipley. Marshall accepted the check in payment of $1,400 overdue debts and $300 in cash. Under the circumstances, Marshall is

A

A holder in due course and entitled to recover the full amount.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Which of the following defenses may be successfully asserted by the maker against holder in due course?

a. Discharge of the maker of the instrument in bankruptcy proceedings.
b. Total failure to perform the contractual undertaking for which the instrument was given.
c. Fraudulent misrepresentations as to the consideration given by a prior holder in exchange for the negotiable instrument.
d. Wrongful filling in of an incomplete instrument by prior holder.

A

Discharge of the maker of the instrument in bankruptcy proceedings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

A holder in due course of negotiable promissory note will take the note subject to which of the following defenses?

a. Unauthorized signature.
b. Failure of consideration.
c. Breach of contract.
d. Fraud in the inducement.

A

Unauthorized signature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Your client has in its possession the following instrument:

$700.00 Pavo, Utah June I, year I

Thirty days after date I promise to pay to the order of

                                 Cash

                                 Seven hundred   Dollars

                                 Boise, Idaho

Value received with interest at the rate of ten percent per annum. This instrument is secured by a conditional sales contract

No. 20 Due July I, year I Signature

A

A negotiable bearer note.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Which of the following is an example of an endorsement found on the back of promissory note that is special qualified endorsement?

a. For deposit only, without recourse, (signed) Jan arake.
b. Pay to Jenny Eaton if she completes the contract dated August 2, (signed) Jan Brake.
c. Pay to Jenny Eaton without recourse, (signed) Jan Brake.
d. Without recourse, (signed) Jan Brake.

A

Pay to Jenny Eaton without recourse, (signed) Jan Brake.

29
Q

Harrison obtained from Bristow his $11,500 check drawn on the Union National Bank in payment for bogus uranium stock. He immediately negotiated it by a blank endorsement to Dunlop in return for $1,000 in cash and her check for $10,500. Dunlop qualified as a holder in due course. She deposited the check in her checking account in the Oceanside Bank. Upon discovering that the stock was bogus, Bristow notified Union National to stop payment on his check, which it did. The check was returned to Oceanside Bank, which in turn debited Dunlop’s account and returned the check to her. Which of the following statements is correct?

a. Dunlop can collect from Union National Bank since Bristow’s stop payment order was invalid in that the defense was only personal defense.
b. Oceanside’s debiting of Dunlop’s account was improper since she qualified as holder in due course.
c. Dunlop will be entitled to collect only $1,000.
d. Dunlop can recover $11,500 from aristow despite the stop order, since she qualified as holder in due course.

A

Dunlop can recover $11,500 from aristow despite the stop order, since she qualified as holder in due course.

30
Q

An instrument that is otherwise negotiable on its face states “Pay to William Chow.” Which of the following statements is(are) correct?

I. It is negotiable if it is a check.

II. It is negotiable if it is a draft drawn on corporation.

III. It is negotiable if it is a promissory note.

A

I only

31
Q

Ore Corp. sold 10 tons of steel to Bay Corp. with payment to be by Bay’s check. Since the price of steel was fluctuating daily, Ore requested that the amount of Bay’s check be left blank and it would fill in the current market price. Bay complied with Ore’s request. Within 2 days Ore received Bay’s check. Although the market price of 10 tons of steel at the time Ore received Bay’s check was $40,000, Ore filled in the check for $50,000 and negotiated it to Cam Corp. Cam took the check in good faith, without notice of Ore’s act or any other defense, and in payment of an antecedent debt. Bay will

A

Be liable to Cam for $50,000.

32
Q

Wilbur executed and delivered a check for $30 payable to the order of Muldowney. Muldowney raised the amount to $300, and negotiated it to Lester, who took the check in good faith and for value without notice of the alteration. When Lester presented it for payment to the bank, the bank refused to honor it due to insufficient funds in Wilbur’s account. Lester is seeking to collect the $300 from Wilbur. Which of the following is correct?

a. The bank’s dishonor of the instrument was wrongful.
b. Wilbur is liable for $800 since Lester is a holder in due course and the defense is a personal defense.
c. The material alteration of the check by Muldowney released Wilbur from all liability to subsequent parties.
d. Lester is a holder in due course, but is only entitled to collect $30 from Wilbur unless Wilbur’s negligence facilitated the alteration.

A

Lester is a holder in due course, but is only entitled to collect $30 from Wilbur unless Wilbur’s negligence facilitated the alteration.

33
Q

The Mechanics Bank refused to pay check drawn upon it by Clyde, one of its depositors. Which of the reasons below is not proper defense for the bank to assert when it refused to pay?

a. The bank believed the check to be an overdraft as result of its misdirecting a deposit made by Clyde.
b. Clyde had orally stopped payment on the check.
c. The required endorsement of an intermediary’ transferee was missing.
d. The party attempting to cash the check did not have proper identification.

A

The bank believed the check to be an overdraft as result of its misdirecting a deposit made by Clyde.

34
Q

Balquist sold a negotiable instrument payable to her order to Farley. In transferring the instrument to Farley, she forgot to endorse it. Accordingly

A

Farley has a specifically enforceable right to obtain Balquist’s unqualified endorsement.

35
Q

Jason contracted to sell his business to Farr. Upon execution of the contract by Farr, he delivered a note in lieu of earnest money which recited the nature of the transaction and indicated that it was payable on the date of the closing which was to be determined by the mutual consent of the parties. The note is

A

Nonnegotiable since it is not payable at a definite time.

36
Q

A maker of note will have valid defense against holder in due course as result of any of the following conditions except

a. Fraud in the execution.
b. Infancy.
c. Forgery.
d. Lack of consideration.

A

Lack of consideration.

37
Q

Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, an instrument will be precluded from being negotiable if the instrument

A

Is made subject to another agreement.

38
Q

An instrument complies with the requirements for negotiability contained in the Commercial Paper Article of the Uniform Commercial Code. The instrument contains language expressly acknowledging the receipt of $10,000 by the First Bank of Grand Rapids and an agreement to repay principal with interest at 15%, I year from date. This instrument is

A

A negotiable certificate of deposit.

39
Q

Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, which of the following statements is(are) correct regarding the requirements for an instrument to be negotiable?

I. The instrument must be in writing, be signed by both the drawer and the drawee, and contain an unconditional promise or order to pay.

Il. The instrument must state fixed amount of money, be payable on demand or at definite time, and be payable to order or to bearer.

A

II only

40
Q

Ard is holding the following instrument:

I, Rosemary Larking, hereby promise to pay to the bearer twenty thousand dollars ($20,000). This document is given by me as payment of the balance due on my purchase of a year I Winnebago mobile home from Ed Sill and is payable when I am able to obtain a bank loan.

                                                                  Rosemary Larking

                                                                  Rosemary Larking

This instrument is not negotiable because it

A

Is not payable at a definite time.

41
Q

Ball borrowed $10,000 from Link. Ball, unable to repay the debt on its due date, fraudulently induced Park to purchase a piece of worthless costume jewelry for $10,000. Ball had Park write a check for that amount naming Link as the payee. Ball gave the check to Link in satisfaction of the debt Ball owed Link. Unaware of Ball’s fraud, Link cashed the check. When Park discovered Ball’s fraud, Park demanded that Link repay the $10,000. Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, will Link be required to repay Park?

A

No, because Link is a holder in due course of the check.

42
Q

An otherwise negotiable note has the amount payable as three hundred dollars in words. However, the amount stated in figures is $1,300.00. Which of the following is correct?

a. The amount legally due on this note is $1,300.
b. This note is not negotiable.
c. The amount legally due on this note is $300 because the words control over the figures.
d. The amount legally due on this note is $300 because it is the lesser of the two amounts.

A

The amount legally due on this note is $300 because the words control over the figures.

43
Q

Which of the following provisions contained in an otherwise negotiable instrument will cause it to be nonnegotiable?

a. It is limited to payment out of the entire assets of a partnership.
b. It grants to the holder an option to purchase land.
c. It contains an unrestricted acceleration clause.
d. It is payable in Mexican pesos.

A

It grants to the holder an option to purchase land.

44
Q

For person to be holder in due course of promissory note

A

The note must be negotiable.

45
Q

Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, which of the following instruments meets the negotiability requirement of being payable on demand or at a definite time?

a. A promissory note payable June 30, year 1, whose maturity can be extended by the maker for reasonable time.
b. A promissory’ note payable one year after a person’s marriage.
c. A promissory note payable June 30, year I, whose holder can extend the time of payment until the following June 30 if the holder wishes.
d. An undated promissory note payable one month after date.

A

A promissory note payable June 30, year I, whose holder can extend the time of payment until the following June 30 if the holder wishes.

46
Q

Insofar as the requirements for given instrument to qualify as negotiable under the UCC

A

The requirements do not preclude an instrument from qualifying as negotiable instrument despite the fact that there is doubt whether it is draft or note.

47
Q

Baker sold goods to Abrams for $300, taking Abrams’ negotiable note in payment, with the agreement that Baker would deliver the goods immediately. Baker sold and endorsed the note to Cantrell, an innocent party, for $250 of which $50 was paid in cash and $200 was to be paid in 10 days. Baker did not deliver the goods for which the note had been given before the 10 days expired, and Abrams so informed Cantrell. Cantrell paid the remaining $200 to Baker on the 10th day as agreed. Cantrell sued Abrams for the $300. Which of the following statements is a correct legal solution or proposition?

a. Cantrell can recover the full $300.
b. Cantrell can only recover $250.
c. The total failure to deliver any of the goods constitutes defense which will prevail even against holder in due course.
d. Cantrell can only recover $60.

A

Cantrell can only recover $60.

48
Q

Fred Anchor is the holder of the following check:

Peter Mason

Champaign, Illinois 4/30/year 1

Pay to the order of Mary Nix or bearer $93.00

Ninety-Three Dollars

Second Bank 0453-0978

                                                                       Peter Mason

The check is endorsed on the back as follows:

Mary Nix

Pay to John Jacobs

Mark Harris

John Jacobs

(without recourse)

Jacobs gave the check to his son as a gift, who transferred it to Anchor for $78.00. Which of the following statements is correct?

a. Nix’s endorsement was required to negotiate the check to any subsequent holder.
b. The check is bearer paper in Jacob’s son’s hands.
c. Anchor does not qualify as a holder because less than full consideration was given for the check.
d. The unqualified endorsement of Jacobs was necessary in order to negotiate the check to his son.

A

The check is bearer paper in Jacob’s son’s hands.

49
Q

Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, which of the following parties has secondary liability on an instrument?

a. An acceptor of a note.
b. A drawer of a draft.
c. A maker of a note.
d. An issuer of cashier’s check.

A

A drawer of a draft.

50
Q

Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, which of the following instruments is classified as promise to pay?

a. A trade acceptance.
b. A certificate of deposit.
c. A draft.
d. A check.

A

A certificate of deposit.

51
Q

Filmore had a negotiable instrument in its possession which it had received in payment of certain equipment it had sold to Marker Merchandising. The instrument was originally payable to the order of Charles Danforth or bearer. It was endorsed specially by Danforth to Marker which in turn negotiated it to Filmore via a blank endorsement. The instrument in question, along with some cash and other negotiable instruments, was stolen from Filmore on February I. Which of the following is correct?

a. The theft constitutes a common law conversion which prevents anyone from obtaining a better title to the instrument than the owner.
b. Once an instrument is bearer paper it is always bearer paper.
c. A holder in due course will prevail against Filmore’s claim to the instrument.
d. Filmore’s signature was necessary in order to further negotiate the instrument.

A

A holder in due course will prevail against Filmore’s claim to the instrument.

52
Q

Dodger fraudulently induced Tell to issue a check to his order for $900 in payment for some nearly worthless securities. Dodger tock the check and artfully raised the amount from $900 to $1,900. He promptly negotiated the check to Bay who took in good faith and for value. Tell, upon learning of the fraud, issued a stop order to its bank. Which of the following is correct?

a. Bay as a holder in due course will prevail against Tell but only to the extent of $900.
b. Dodger has a real defense which will prevent any of the parties from collecting anything.
c. Had there been no raising of the amount by Dodger, the bank would be obligated to pay Bay despite the stop order.
d. The stop order was ineffective against Bay since it was issued after the negotiation to Bay.

A

Bay as a holder in due course will prevail against Tell but only to the extent of $900.

53
Q

To the extent that holder of negotiable promissory note is holder in due course, the holder takes the note free from which of the following defenses?

a. Minority of the maker where it is defense to enforcement of contract.
b. Forgery of the maker’s signature.
c. Nonperformance of a condition precedent.
d. Discharge of the maker in bankruptcy.

A

Nonperformance of a condition precedent.

54
Q

Blue is a holder of a check which was originally drawn by Rush and made payable to Silk. Silk properly endorsed the check to Field. Field had the check certified by the drawee bank and then endorsed the check to Blue. As a result

A

The drawee bank becomes primarily liable and both Silk and Rush are discharged.

55
Q

John Daly received a check which was originally made payable to the order of one of his customers, Al Pine. The following endorsement was written on the back of the check: Al Pine, without recourse, for collection only

The endorsement on this check would be classified as

A

Blank, qualified, and restrictive.

56
Q

Your client, Ensign Factors Corporation, has purchased the trade acceptance shown below from Mason Art Production, Inc. It has been properly indorsed in blank on the back by Mason.

                                                                   January 2, year I

Adams Wholesalers, Inc.

49 Buena Vista Avenue

Santa Monica, California

Pay to the order of Mason Art Productions, Inc.

Ten thousand and 00/1/ dollars ($10,000.00)

Gilda Louchsi, President

Mason Art Production, Inc.

Accepted February 2, year I

Adams Wholesalers, Inc.

By Charles Lurch, President

As to the rights of Ensign, which of the following is correct?

a. After acceptance by Adams, Mason is primarily liable, and Adams is secondarily liable.
b. Until acceptance, Mason had primary liability on the instrument.
c. After acceptance by Adams Wholesalers, Adams is primarily liable and Mason is secondarily liable.
d. The instrument is nonnegotiable, hence Ensign is an assignee.

A

After acceptance by Adams Wholesalers, Adams is primarily liable and Mason is secondarily liable.

57
Q

Calhoun has in his possession a negotiable instrument which was originally payable to the order of Bannister. It was transferred to Calhoun by a mere delivery by Travis, who tock it from Bannister in good faith in satisfaction of an antecedent debt. The back of the instrument read as follows, “Pay to the order of Travis in satisfaction of my prior purchase of a used IBM typewriter, signed Bannister.” Which of the following is correct?

a. Calhoun isa holder in due course.
b. Travis’ taking the instrument for an antecedent debt prevents him from qualifying as a holder in due course.
c. Calhoun has the right to assert Travis’ rights, including his standing as a holder in due course and also has the right to obtain Travis’ signature.
d. Bannister’s endorsement was a special endorsement; thus, Travis’ signature was not required in order to negotiate it.

A

Calhoun has the right to assert Travis’ rights, including his standing as a holder in due course and also has the right to obtain Travis’ signature.

58
Q

McGee fraudulently induced Howards into making out a personal check to him. McGee negotiated the check by endorsement to Trotz who was aware of the fraud. Trotz negotiated the check to Point who qualified as a holder in due course. Point negotiated the check back to Trotz. When Trotz tried to cash the check, the bank refused, saying a stop payment order had been issued. Tatz then tried to collect on the check from Howards. Which of the following is correct?

a. Tatz can qualify as an actual holder in due course because he did not commit the fraud himself.
b. Trotz can collect on the check from Howards because he is a holder through a holder in due course.
c. Trotz can collect on the check from the bank because he is a holder through a holder in due course.
d. Tatz cannot collect on the check from either Howards or the bank.

A

Tatz cannot collect on the check from either Howards or the bank.

59
Q

The following question concerns an instrument which Alex & Co. has in its possession:

                                                  No. 003

                                                  November 1, year 1 62-105

                                                                                      251

Pay to the order of Alex & Co. $1,000.00

One Thousand and 00/100 Dollars

Ten days after presentment

Security Trust Company

Austin, Texas

Memo for purchases of securities

                                                                        (signature)

                                                                    Herbert Stein

The above instrument is

A

A draft

60
Q

Wixstad asked Montrose, his father-in-law, to sign a note as an accommodation comaker. Montrose did this for Wixstad as a personal favor to his daughter. Both endorsed the note for value to Carlton who had knowledge that Montrose had signed the note for Wixstad’s accommodation only. With respect to Montrose’s rights and liabilities, which of the following is correct?

a. Carlton’s best basis for recovery is to sue Montrose as an endorser.
b. In the event Wixstad defaults on the note, notice must be promptly given to Montase in order to hold him liable.
c. Carlton has the right to treat either or both parties as primarily liable on the note.
d. Montase has no liability beyond one-half of the face value of the note plus interest.

A

Carlton has the right to treat either or both parties as primarily liable on the note.

61
Q

Which of the following aspects of an otherwise negotiable promissory note will render it nonnegotiable?

a. The maker intentionally using a rubber stamp to sign the note.
b. The maker has the right to prepay the note, subject to a prepayment penalty of of the amount prepaid.
d. The maker is obligated to pay the payee’s costs of collection upon default by the maker.
d. The maker is obligated to pay a fixed amount to the payee but may instead deliver to the payee goods of equal value.

A

The maker is obligated to pay a fixed amount to the payee but may instead deliver to the payee goods of equal value.

62
Q

Gomer developed a fraudulent system whereby he could obtain checks payable to the order of certain repairmen who serviced various large corporations. Gomer observed the delivery trucks of repairmen who did business with the corporations, and then he submitted bills on the bogus letterhead of the repairmen to the selected large corporations. The return envelope for payment indicated a local post office box. When the checks arrived, Gomer would forge the payees’ signatures and cash the checks. The parties cashing the checks are holders in due course. Who will bear the loss assuming the amount cannot be recovered from Gomer?

A

The defrauded corporations.

63
Q

Curator contracted to sell Train’s painting. Train issued a $10,000 note to Curator that was payable within 10 days after Curator sold Train’s painting. Curator sold the painting on May I. Train, alleging that the note was not a negotiable instrument, refused to pay the note. Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, which of the following statements is correct regarding the status of the note?

a. The note was negotiable because it was conditioned on an event that took place.
b. The note was negotiable because it was for a sum certain.
c. The note was not a negotiable instrument because it was not payable at definite time.
d. The note was not negotiable because it was subject to another writing.

A

The note was not a negotiable instrument because it was not payable at definite time.

64
Q

Dilworth, an employee of Excelsior Super Markets, Inc., stole his payroll check from the cashier before it was completed. The check was properly made out to his order but the amount payable had not been filled in because Dilworth’s final time sheet had not yet been received. Dilworth filled in an amount which was $300 in excess of his proper pay and cashed it at the Good Luck Tavern. Good Luck took the check in good faith and without suspecting that the instrument had been improperly completed. Excelsior’s bank paid the instrument in due course. Excelsior is demanding that the bank credit its account for the $300 or that it be paid by Good Luck. Which of the following is correct?

a. A theft defense would be good against all parties including Good Luck.
b. Only in the event that negligence on Excelsior’s part can be shown will Excelsior bear the loss.
c. Excelsior’s bank must credit Excelsior’s account for the $300.
d. Good Luck has no liability for the return of the $300.

A

Good Luck has no liability for the return of the $300.

65
Q

Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the UCC, which of the following statements is correct regarding check?

a. A check is a promise to pay money.
b. A check is an order to pay money.
c. A check does not need to be drawn on bank.
d. A check does not need to be payable on demand.

A

A check is an order to pay money.

66
Q

A client has in its possession the instrument below.

I, Margaret Dunlop, hereby promise to pay to the order of Caldwell Motors five thousand dollars ($5,000) upon the receipt of the final distribution from the estate of my deceased uncle, Carlton Dunlop. This negotiable instrument is given by me as the down payment on my purchase of a 20Y2 Lincoln Continental to be delievered in 2 weeks.

                                                             (signature)

                                                             Margaret Dunlop

The instrument is

A

Not negotiable because it is not payable at a definite time.

67
Q

Below is note which your client Best Realtors obtained from Green in connection with Green’s purchase of land located in Rye, NY. The note was given for the balance due on the purchase and was secured by first mortgage on the land.

$90,000.00 Rye, NY

                                                                May I, year I

For value received, 6 years after date, I promise to pay to the order of Best Realtors NINETY THOUSAND and 00/100 DOLLARS with interest at compounded annually until fully paid. This instrument arises out of the sale of land located in NY and the law of NY is to be applied to any question which may arise. It is secured by first mortgage on the land conveyed. It is further greed that:

I. Purchaser will pay the costs of collection including attorney’s fees upon default.

  1. Purchaser may repay the amount outstanding on any anniversary date of this note.
                                                               Ted Green
    
                                                                Ted Green 

The note is a

A

Negotiable promissory note

68
Q

Which of the following is true of stop payment order given by drawer of check to the drawee bank?

a. The stop payment order may be oral but is effective for shorter time than written stop payment order.
b. Stop payment orders must be in writing to be effective.
c. The drawer of a check can give a stop payment order only if s/he can prove a valid defense.
d. If the drawee bank fails to follow a valid stop payment order, it is automatically liable to the drawer for the amount of the check.

A

he stop payment order may be oral but is effective for shorter time than written stop payment order.

69
Q

In order to be holder of bearer negotiable instrument, the transferee must

A

Have physical possession of the instrument.