SAC 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a group?

A

two or more people who interact with each other are influenced by each other an share a common purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define power

A

the ability a person has to get someone to do something for them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Six types of power

A

Reward- ability to provide the desired response.
Coreviece- ability to use force
information-having knowledge someone wants
legitimate-power is given by a higher authority
expert-power is due to skills and knowledge
referent- power comes from the desire to relate to the powerful person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 styles of leadership

A

DEMOCRATIC- the leader negotiates with the group and takes their views into account when making decisions.
AUTHORIAN- leader makes all decisions with no consideration & controls behaviour of all members.
LAIZZRE-FAIRE- “leader” is present but takes no part in the groups dynamics or descion making. There is no real structure or authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment - IV, DV, participants, method, results, criticisms,
ethical issues

A

IV- Whether the participants were guards or prisoners
DV- how the participants would behaviour.
Participants-Were students off Stanford uni, were volunteers and were all payed for 14 days even though it only lasted 5.
Method-made participants guards or prisons deindiudalised them and put them in cells w no windows
Criticisms- Ethicial considerations were violated, served lasting harm on participants. but it started an investigation in to how prisoners are treated in prisoners.
Ethical issues- no last harm principle
-withdrawl rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Milgrim’s experiment - aim, method, results, ethical issues

A

Aim- to discover whether participants would obey an authority figure and carry out actions that cause severe pain to others.
Method- 40 male volunteers they were payed. Participants were the ‘teacher’ and were instructed to administer shocks to a “student” who was in on it. While an experimenter used prods to get the teacher to continue.
Results-ALL participants obeyed up to 300 volts. 65% went all the way. Milgram concluded that a person is likely to go against their beliefs if told to by an authority figure.
Ethical issues- No harm principle
withdrawal rights
deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Asch’s experiment - aim, method, results, conclusion

A

Aim-was to investigate the extent to which an individual within a group will conform to majority opinion.
Method- 50 college students were asked which line was the closed to length on a piece of paper. The participants were always second last to give an answer.
Results- 74% conformed
Conclusion- they conformed bc; they wanted to belong, and believed others were more informed than them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a meta analysis?

A

research that examines the results of many other studies and combines all the findings.
this means the experimenter has increased confidence in the findings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name the 7 factors effecting conformity

NCISGUD

A

normative influence, culture, informational influence, social loafing, group size, unanimity, deindividuation,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the 7 factors effecting conformity

A

NORMATIVE INFLUENCE- a persons tendency to go along with the group; if group member have similar chararctistics there will be a greater normative influence.
CULTURE- The difference between cultures
individualist culture; independence, where it is important for individuals to achieve there own goals
collectivist culture; individual goals are less important the group goals.
INFORMATIONAL INFLUENCE- participants want to provide a correct response but aren’t certain of their ability, believing others are more capable.
SOCIAL LOAFING the tendency of an individual to reduce their efforts when working in a group,
GROUP SIZE- conformity rates increased to a maximum with three or four confederates, and the remained about the same.
UNANIMITY- conformity rates dropped when one of the confederates gave the correct answer as the participant had someone w them.
DEINDIVUATION- when someone can not be indentiyed in the group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is helping behaviour?

A

behaviour that benefits other people and society in general- also called pro social behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explanations of pro social behavior

A

biological (nature)- sees helping behaviour as genetic
Environmental(nurture)- helping behaviour is learned
Interaction- although we might be born with an innate, exactly how we help is of social learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Factors influencing helping behaviour

A

THE SITUATION ; location, perception, proximity, group or alone, emergency or not
SOCAIL NORMS- an action that is standardised and expected in society, they are learned and provide a background for human social interaction.
PERSONAL FACTORS; empathy, mood competence, altruism: selflessness even if there is nothing to be gained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DEFINE N EXPLAIN- Bystander intervention and effect

A

BYSTANDER INTERVENTION- a person voluntary help someone;

BYSTANDER EFFECT- more likely to help others when they are alone then when others are around.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why does the bystander effect occur?

A

diffusion of responsibilty- someone else will do it
audience inhibition- self conscious

social influence- The behaviour of other people serves as a role model for our own behaviour. Also, other people can
exert pressure to act in a particular way

Proximity of the victim - how close the victim is to the
potential helper. The greater the distance the less likely to
help.

Nature of the bystander - moral development, past
experience, personality, mood etc

Cost-benefit analysis-Three stages a person goes through in assessing the pros
and cons of helping. (a)physiological arousal (b) labelling the arousal (c) evaluating the consequences

Deindividuation- More likely to commit anti social behaviour when they can’t be identified personally eg. crowd at football game

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Decision- stage model of helping explanation

A

a model of the situational influences on bystander intervention. It says that when confronted with a situation that might require their assistance, potential helpers go through five stages in deciding to help.

17
Q

Decision- stage model of helping STAGES

A

-Do we notice that help is needed
-Is this a situation an emergency
-Does the potential helper take responsibility
-Does the potential helper decide on a way to help
-Does the potential take action to help
help is given

18
Q

Social norms - reciprocity and social responsibility

A

SOCIAL NORM- a norm is a form of action of behaviour that is standardised and expected in society, they are learned and provide a background for social human interaction.
RECIPROCITY PRINCIPLE- do unto others as they do unto you
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY NORM- members of society are expected to help out in times of need.

19
Q

Personal characteristics of the helper

A

EMPATHY our emotional response to another persons mood
MOOD- a person is more likely to help if they are in a good mood
COMPETENCE- the way a bystander perceives their confidence to deal with an emergency will influence whether they will provide help.
ALTRUISM- is a unique influence on pro-social behaviour where, for no personal gain and sometimes at a great personal cost, a person helps others due to a deeply felt concern for fellow beings.

20
Q

Kitty Genovese – be familiar with this case study

A

No body responded to her screams for help as her murder repeatedly attacked her. at least 12 people would have heard her cries, but failed to act.

21
Q

Characteristics of non-helping behaviour

A

the situation

they bystander effect

22
Q

Latane and Darley studies- IV, DV, ethical issues

A

IV-the number of witnesses that participants believed to be present.
DV- whether the participants would report the smoke
ethical issues-

23
Q

Definition and explanation of different types of bullying

A

BULLYING- a form of behaviour where an individual or group will intentionally and repeatedly cause another person mental or physical harm.
DIRECT PHYSICAL- hitting, tripping, pushing damaging property.
DIRECT VERBAL- name calling, insults, offensive remarks, teasing
INDIRECT/CONVERT- lying, spreading rumours, social exclusion, mimicking
CYBERBULLYNG- pranking, image sharing, sending threatening texts or emails.

24
Q

POSTIVE INFLUENCES of advertising and media on individuals and groups

A
creates friendships 
educating
entertainment
informs people
brings people together
makes people feel connected
communication 
contact with friends and family
knowledge of issue
25
Q

NEGATIVE INFLUENCES of advertising and media on individuals and groups

A
distracted 
exposure to online predators
low self esteem 
body shame 
causes mental health issues 
pornography 
bullying
negative comments
privacy 
sterotypes 
negative effect on mental health
privacy