Saavedra & Silverman (2002) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the aim of Saavedra & Silverman’s (2002) study?

A

To investigate the effectiveness of exposure therapy and cognitive-behavioral interventions in treating a young boy’s button phobia (koumpounophobia).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of phobia did the child in Saavedra & Silverman’s study have?

A

A phobia of buttons, specifically an intense fear of small, plastic buttons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What therapy method was primarily used in Saavedra & Silverman’s (2002) study?

A

Exposure therapy combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), focusing on systematic desensitization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What age was the participant in Saavedra & Silverman’s (2002) case study?

A

The participant was a 9-year-old Hispanic American boy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did the researchers measure the boy’s fear of buttons in the study?

A

They used a “Feelings Thermometer,” where the boy rated his distress on a scale of 0 to 8 for different button-related stimuli.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What kind of button did the boy in Saavedra & Silverman’s study fear the most?

A

The boy feared small, clear plastic buttons the most, rating them with the highest level of distress (8 on the scale).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was “in vivo” exposure used in the study?

A

“In vivo” exposure refers to gradually exposing the child to buttons in real life to reduce his fear response over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What cognitive intervention was employed alongside exposure therapy in Saavedra & Silverman’s study?

A

The boy was encouraged to challenge his negative thoughts and irrational beliefs about buttons by discussing them and reframing them with his therapist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the results of the treatment in Saavedra & Silverman’s study?

A

By the end of treatment, the boy’s distress toward buttons significantly decreased, and he could handle buttons without severe anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is evaluative learning, and how was it relevant in this study?

A

Evaluative learning is when an individual forms negative emotional associations with a stimulus (buttons, in this case), which then elicits fear or disgust. The boy’s fear of buttons was believed to stem from such evaluative learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How long did the treatment in Saavedra & Silverman’s study last?

A

The treatment took place over several sessions spanning approximately 10 weeks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the ethical considerations in Saavedra & Silverman’s study?

A

The researchers ensured informed consent was obtained from the boy’s parents, and they monitored the boy’s well-being throughout the process, minimizing distress during treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was a major conclusion from Saavedra & Silverman’s (2002) study?

A

Exposure therapy combined with cognitive restructuring can effectively reduce phobic responses even in cases of extreme or unusual phobias, such as button phobia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is one limitation of Saavedra & Silverman’s study?

A

As a case study involving a single participant, the results may not be generalizable to other individuals with phobias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly