S2W1Emot Flashcards

1
Q

Emotion

A

Pattern of changes including physiological, feelings, cognition and behaviour, in response to a situation.

Short, intense, cause clear, can make mood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mood

A

A pervasive and sustained emotion that when extreme can influence one’s life.

Long, subtle, cause unclear, can causeemotion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Basic v complex

A

Basic independent of culture.

Complex dependent on culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Robert Plutchik (1980) – bipolar emotions

A

Anger/Fear

Anticipation/Surprise

Trust/Disgust

Joy/Sadness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dimensions of emotion

A

Watson and Tellegen (1985)

High/Low positive effect
High/Low negative effect

Barrett and Russell (1998)

Misery – Pleasure
Arousal – Sleep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

History vs. Modern views

A

Past:

Independent of cognition
Physiological theories

Now:

Increased understanding of neural basis of cognition

Cognition and emotion NOT independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Emotions and the brain

A

Brain structures subcortical

Fast and automatic

Relatively unfiltered

Trigger stimulus can be unconscious/conscious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The amygdala

A

Almond shape

Front of temporal lobe

Part of limbic system

Connection to other regions

Damage:

Impaired recognition of anger and disgust

Inability to match pictures of same person with different expressions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hypothalamus

A

Below thalamus, above brainstem

Part of limbic system

Connected with many levels of nervous system

Role in expression rather than production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Basal Forebrain

A

Part of subcortical nuclei

Links to cortical and limbic areas

Receives cortical and amygdala inputs

Cognitive-emotional integration via prefrontal loops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ochsner et al. (2009):

Bottom up vs. top down

A

Bottom up: aversive photos, respond naturally

Top down: neutral photos, interpret as if aversive

BU condition:

Occipital, temporal and parietal lobes (vision)

Amygdala (negative affect).

TD condition:

Dorsolaterlal prefrontal cortex and medial prefrontal cortex (high-level cognition)

Anterior cingulate and amygdala.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Appraisal theories

A

Cognitive processes influence when and what emotions are experienced.

Most important processes involve appraisal.

Many different theories.

Conscious top-down processing

Distinction between conscious and automatic processing.

Situation>Appraisal>Emotion>Action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Smith and Kirby (2001) Appraisal

A

Appraisal can occur:

Automatically (activation of memories)

Consciously (reasoning; slower/more flexible)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Brosch (2013) Appraisal

A

Emotional responses occur due to evaluation of environmental changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Schartau (2009) conscious appraisals

A

Viewed distress or horror films.

Eperienced less distress and horror when told to appraise the situation in both self-report and GSR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Winkielman et al. (2005) non-conscious emotional processing

A

Participants shown happy, angry or neutral faces subliminally

Those shown happy drank twice as much as angry.

Affective blind sight (affect from stimulus without awareness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Appraisal theories: strengths

A

Appraisal determines whether we experience emotion and what it is.

Individual differences can be explained.

Distinction between conscious and automatic processes is valuable

Cognitive manipulations affect emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Appraisal theories: weaknesses

A

Situational appraisal not always crucial

Research focused on passive individuals

Theories focus on emotion due to current situation, not future

Causal structure may not be unidirectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Emotional regulation and generation

A

Distinction between regulation and generation blurred:

Overlapping brain regions

Research suggests differences between emotion regulation and generation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Process model

Gross & Thompson (2007)

A

Emotion Generation:

Situation>Attention>Appraisal>Response.

Emotional Regulation:

Situation selection – leaving a bad situation
Situation modification – ask a friend to come
Attention deployment – distraction/reappraisal
Cognitive change – trying to think positively
Response modulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Troy et al. (2013) Emotion regulation

A

Participants with high appraisal ability had less depression when stress was uncontrollable.

Participants with high appraisal ability had more depression when stress was controllable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Kohn et al. (2014): Regulation three stages

A
  1. Emotion Evaluation:

Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

Initiates appraisal and signal needed for regulation

  1. Initiation of Regulation:

Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Processing regulation

  1. Execution of Regulation:

Regulates arousal by changing emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Kohn regulation strengths

A

Brain regions identified

Effectiveness of strategies is understood

Processes can be explicit or implicit

Influencing factors identified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Kohn regulation weaknesses

A

Behavioural strategies of regulation more common

Environmental influences not accounted for (lab)

Processing not explained

Individual differences not accounted for

Distinction between generation and regulation not clear cut

25
Q

Attention

A

Increased activation of occipital region following:

Emotional compared to neutral expressions

Emotional compared to neutral scenes

Negative affect = narrowing of attention

Positive affect = broadening of attention

26
Q

Motivational intensity

A

The strength of the urge to approach a positive stimulus or move away from a negative one.

Anger/Fear = high

Sadness = low

Happiness = high or low

27
Q

Effect of emotion and motivational intensity in attention

A

+/- affect, high MI= narrow

Helps people acquire desirable objects and avoid unpleasant ones.

+/- affect, low MI= broaden

Leaves people open to new opportunities

28
Q

Talarico et al. (2009) MI and Affect

A

Recall emotional autobiographical memories

Poor recall of peripheral details associated with negative emotions

Sad memories had reasonably good recall (low motivational intensity)

Good recall of peripheral details associated with positive emotions

29
Q

Visual search tasks MI and Affect

A

Angry and happy faces are detected faster than neutral ones

30
Q

Attentional blink paradigm MI and Affect

A

Stimuli presented in rapid succession and told to attend target stimuli.

If 2nd target appears 180-450ms after 1st it is missed.

If 2nd target is emotional such as ‘rape’ then it is not missed.

Emotionally laden words reduce attentional blink.

31
Q

Mood congruency and memory

A

Current affect leads to recall of information with similar affect.

Happy at present time leads to recalling happy memories.

Greater for positive than negative.

Found in recognition tasks and retrieval of memories.

32
Q

Mood dependency and memory

A

Memory improved if affect when learning is same as affect when remembered

Happy affect aids recall learnt in happy mood.

Greater for positive than negative.

Neutral words remembered better when mood at encoding matches recall

33
Q

Kenealy (1997) Mood-state-dependent memory

A

Music manipulates mood

Participants learn route instructions

Free or cued (map) recall

Mood-state-dependent memory in free recall but not for cued.

Memory likely to be mood dependent when effortful processing required (uncued)

34
Q

Amygdala and mood dependent memory

A

Adolphs et al., (1997)

Left amygdala damage associated with impaired memory for emotional stimuli

Sergerie (2006)

Right amygdala involved in emotional memory formation

Left amygdala involved in emotional memory retrieval

35
Q

Attention and memory

strengths

A

Evidence for mood congruity and mood dependent memory

Effects explained by encoding specificity principle

Increasing understanding of role amygdala plays in effects of mood on memory

36
Q

Attention and memory

weaknesses

A

Narrowing/broadening having effect on LTM only partially correct

Mood-state-dependent memory effects stronger with some tasks than others

Amygdala role not fully understood

Harder to find evidence for mood congruity and mood-state-dependent memory with negative mood (participants inclined to eliminate negative moods)

37
Q

Effect of anxiety on decision making

A

Pessimistic

Risk averse

Inefficient processing

Why?

Threatening situations + uncertainty = anxiety.

Leads to minimising risk taking to increase certainty

38
Q

Effect of sadness on decision making

A

Pessimistic

Risk taking if rewards involved

Analytic processing

Why?

Unattainable goal = sadness

Leads to abandon goal and low self-esteem.

See environment as unrewarding = analytical thinking on new goals

Leads to seek rewards to enhance self

39
Q

Raghunathan and Pham (1999) sadness/anxiety and decisions

A

Job A (high salary + low job security)

Job B (average salary + high job security)

Those anxious state less likely to choose high-risk option.

Those in sad state more likely to choose high-risk option.

40
Q

Cryder et al. (2008) misery is not miserly effect

A

Sad individuals have diminished sense of self and acquire possessions to enhance self

Sad individuals with high self-focus willing to pay 4 times as much for bottle

41
Q

Effect of anger on decision making

A

Optimistic

Risk taking when sole decision maker

Heuristic processing

Why?

Obstacle to goal + Sense of control over situation = anger

Leads to optimism about overcoming obstacle and of success.

42
Q

Effect of happiness on decision making

A

Optimistic

Risk averse

Heuristic processing

Why?

Positive mood = motivated to stay in mood.

Leads to avoidance of risky behaviour and analytical processing

43
Q

de Vries et al. (2008) Heuristic/analytic processing

A

Happy prefer heuristic processing more than sad people.

Put into happy/sad mood and told to use heuristic or analytic processing.

People most satisfied with their decision making when using preferred strategy.

44
Q

Persuasiveness of arguments

Griskevicius et al. (2010)

A

Found three positive mood states exhibited shallow (heuristic) processing.

Another two positive moods (awe and love) associated with deeper processing than neutral.

45
Q

Moral dilemnas: emotion vs. cognition (train)

A

Change direction of train to kill one person to save 5.
90% of people choose this
No personal involvement
Weak emotional reaction

Push one person off a bridge to save 5.
10% of people choose this
Personal involvement
Strong emotional reaction

46
Q

Deontological judgements

A

Using your heart

Moral rules and affective system

47
Q

Utilitarian judgements

A

Using your head.

Cognitive system

48
Q

Attentional bias

A

Tendency for a particular class of stimuli to capture attention.

49
Q

Interpretive bias

A

Tendency to interpret ambiguous situations/stimuli in a particular way (often as threatening).

50
Q

Explicit memory bias

A

Tendency to retrieve negative rather than positive information on memory tests involving conscious recollection.

51
Q

Implicit memory bias

A

Tendency to demonstrate better memory for negative information on tests not involving conscious recollection.

52
Q

Anxiety biases

A

Attention bias: attend to threat stimuli

Interpretative bias: Interpret ambiguous cues negatively

Explicit memory: Weak association

Implicit memory: No

53
Q

Dot-probe task

A

Two stimuli presented at same time

During critical trials, one stimulus emotionally negative other neutral

A dot is presented in the location of one stimulus.

Indicate location of dot.

RT shorter under attended areas (emotionally negative)

54
Q

Cognitive biases and depression

A

Attention bias: favour negative information

Interpretative bias: interpret ambiguous cues negatively

Explicit memory: report more -than + memories

Implicit memory: weak association

55
Q

Joormann (2007) bias and depression

A

Impaired cognitive control in depressed individuals causes problems disengaging from negative information.

They then elaborate on this information, leading to enhanced memory of negative information.

56
Q

Cognitive bias modification

A

Two key features:

Targets a bias known to the disorder

Practising task which aids to reduce the bias

Two main forms:

Cognitive bias modification for attention (CBM-A)

Cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I)

57
Q

CBM anxiety

A

Multisession CBM = social phobia & GAD

CBM-A reduces recurrent negative thoughts in chronic worriers

58
Q

CBM depression

A

CBM-A reduces intensity of depression

CBM-I reduces negative emotions following stress

59
Q

Limitations of CBM research

A

Small sample sizes

Small number of studies

Suboptimal research quality

Optimal program varies according to how many biases are present