S2 W2 Counterfactual reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

What is Counterfactual reasoning

A

is the ability to reason about situations and events removed from, or contrary to, current reality. This includes the ability to think about the past and the future, and situations with multiple possible outcomes. (if only or what if)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is required to think about what might have been?

A

We separate ourselves from current reality
Mentally construct an alternative version of the world in which one thing has changed and then
Track how this single change would have affected the rest of the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The mouse game

A

Slide with two outlets: their job was to place cotton wool to ensure that the mouse landed safely. After the mouse slid down, “What if next he goes the other way?” “Can you put out cotton wool”. Children can think about a signle possibility in the future, they find it harder to think of multiple possibilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Counterfactual reasoning Regret

A

If you buy a scratch card and win £10, you would probably be quite happy. But if the person next in line won £500,000, you’d probably feel something negative, even though you’d made a profit. This reaction arises from comparing one particular outcome in relation to an alternative outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Counterfactual reasoning Relief

A

If a storm blows a branch off a tree so that it scratches your car, you’d probably be annoyed But if the two cars on either side of your car had both been crushed by fallen trees, you’d probably experience something positive. This feeling requires that you compare a particular outcome in relation to an alternative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Imagined counterfactual world

A

appreciate that a specific point in the past two possible world diverged because of a single causal event, “I took the bus instead of the car”. Causal relation between a specific past event and its subsequent outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two possible world

A

challenging for children ‘actual’ ‘possible’ consequences of a single causal event difficult. (mouse 2 paths)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

World almost

A

what almost happened. Two possible world. 5Y interpret reliably this counterfactual use of almost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Counterfactual reasoning adn Exectuvie processes

A

Inhibition: ability to ignore interfering cognitions that are irrelevant to a task goal. To reason with false beliefs, you need to inhibt the true beliefs.
Working Memory: ability to hold information in mind that is relevant to a goal. Required to relate to counterfactual and real world.
Attentional flexibility: ability to switch between mental set. To be able to compare and switch between them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Counterfactual reasoning Language

A

receptive vocabulary was related to conditional reasoning with information know to be false (Beck, 2009). Necessary for counterfactual thought/thinking (maybe uniquely human ability) Children may need to understand specific grammatical constructions to think counterfactually. Studies rely heavily on langue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Adults counterfactual thinking susceptible to what ?

A

Biases, more engaged in counterfactual thinking when people act rather than fail to act when counterfactual world seem close rather than distant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Factors affecting counterfactual thinking

A

Language: receptive vocabulary related to conditional reasoning with information know to be false.
Domain specific knowledge: ability to think about possibilities and counterfactuals may differ depending on their causal knowledge in the domain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Imagined counterfactual world

A

Appriciate that a specific point in the past two possible world diverged because of a single casual event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

World almost

A

What almost happened two possible worlds. 5Y interpret reliably this counterfactual use of almost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Self and other judgements

A

7Y felt regret when doing a gambling task, felt worse when they found out a better price was available but when watching other people in same situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Typical Vs Atypical story

A

Mary and Susan decide to have chocolate pudding, Susan doesn’t usually have chocolate pudding. Everyone got sick. Who would feel worse?
7Y: approached adult levels of performance when judging complex emotions.
5Y responses only reflected an understanding of the actual outcome, no influence of considering alternative outcomes.

17
Q

Adults feel worse when

A

A negative outcome arise through something they chose to do or when the action was unusual.

18
Q

Fixation with present reality

A

Piaget: children frequently make realistic errors and errors of egocentrism.
Recent research: 3Y difficulty separating themselves from their own view of the world = poor ability to reason counterfsctually

19
Q

Counterfactual reasoning develop

A

18m pretend play but that can be separate to the current reality totally and counterfactual reasoning is the ability to considering different possibilities.

20
Q

Future and past Counterfactual reasoning tasks Results

A

Past:
3Y 30% correct
4Y 60% correct
5Y 95% correct
Future
3Y 95% correct
4Y 90% correct