rylands v fletcher Flashcards
Accumulation on the ds land
d must bring hazardous material onto the land and keep it there
the thing is likely to do mischief if it escapes
the thing need not be inherently dangerous. it need only to be something that is likely to cause damage if it escapes
escapes
the thing must escape onto the ds land. any injury sustained as a result of the accumulation on the land itself will not invoke liability
non natural use of land
the use of land must be extraordinary and unusual
remoteness of damage
how closely related the cs damage is to what the d did
giles v walker
there is no liability for something that naturally accumulates on the lans
miles v forest rock granite
the explosives accumulated and therefore caused the rocks to escape
shiffman
this amounted to an escape
read v Lyons
there was no escape
Transco v stockport MBC
although strictly speaking the use of land was not natural it was not unusual or extraordinary either so the d was not liable
Perry v kendricks transport ltd
the d was not liable as the escape was caused by the deliberate act of a third party
act of stranger
d has a complete defence if the escape was caused by the act of a stranger over which d had no control over and whose actions could not have been reasonably foreseen
act of god
this means an act that happens independently of any human action
Carstairs v Taylor
the heavy rain was classed as an act of god