duty of care

Question 1

kent v Griffiths

Answer 1

damage must be reasonably foreseeable

Question 2

jolly v sutton

Answer 2

it was reasonably foreseeable that a child will injure themselves if left alone in a park

Question 3

bourhill v young

Answer 3

no proximity

Question 4

mcloughlin v o Brian

Answer 4

there was proximity as c had no choice

Question 5

hill v chief constable of West Yorkshire

Answer 5

it is not fair just and reasonable to impose a duty of care on the police in the detection pf crime

Question 6

donoghue v stevenson

Answer 6

1) you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that you can reasonably foresee are likely to injure your neighbour 2) your neighbour is anyone so closely or directly affected by your actions that you ought to have them in your consideration

Question 7

Caparo v Dickman

Answer 7

1) the damage must be reasonably foreseeable 2) there must be a relationship of proximity between the parties 3) it must be fair just and reasonable to impose a duty of care