Rylands V Fletcher Flashcards
Ryland’s v fletcher
This rule works when D has accumulated something dangerous on his land, which escapes and causes damage on neighbouring
Elements of the tort
- C must able to sue d
- V must bring or accumulate something on to their land
- The thing must must escape
- There must be an exceptionally high risk of danger if that they were to escape
- The thing must cause reasonably foreseeable damage
- Use of that thing must be a natural use of land
Read v Lyons
Anyone with control of the land where the problem started may be bought to court under Rylands v fletcher
- Can c sue d
Transco v Stockport mc
Like private nuisance, c needs to have a property right in the affected pand to be able to sue them
Ellison v ministry of defence
Where the thing causing damage naturally accumulates on the land, it cannot be said that D has brought it to his land
Did the thing that D escaped
Read v lyons
If the claimant had control it means it did not escape
Stannard v gore
Where fire escapes and causes damage, d must have brought that fire onto his land, no just objects that worsen the fire
- High risk
Transco v Stockport mbc
This means that one could forsee a very hugh risk of danger of it the thing escapes
Cambridge water Co v Eastern countries leather
The type of damage caused must be reasonably foreseeable
- Non natural use of land
Transco v Stockport mbc
A non natural use is an extraordinary and unusual use of the land
Defences
- Act of a stranger- rickards v Lothian
2.Act of God- Nichols v marsland