Private Nuisance Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the elements of the tort

A
  1. C must be able to sue D
  2. Indirect interference
  3. Interference with Cs common and ordinary use of land
  4. The interference must be substantial
  5. The interference must be unlawful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hunter v canary wharf

A

To be able to sue in nuisance, c must have a propiertry interest/illegal right in the land being affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hunter v canary wharf

A

To be able to sue in nuisance, c must have a propiertry interest/illegal right in the land being affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tetly v chitty

A

Tells us who can be sued
1. The creator of the nuisance
2. The occupier of the land creating the nuisance
3. The owner of the land creating the nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sedligh denied v o callaghan

A

An example of physical damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Christie v davey

A

An example of non physical discomfort/ damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Wheeler v Saunders

A

An example of bad smell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Leakey v national trust

A

Failure to prevent it and do anything about it was not good enough for interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Network rail infrastructure Ltd v Morris

A

An example of a nuisance claim failing as D was not affecting a common and ordinary use of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ag v doughty

A

Nice views are just a thing of delight blowing the views was not interfering with the ordinary and common use of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hunter v canary wharf

A

Disrupting TV is not interfering with the common and ordinary use of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Halsey v esso petroleum

A

Shows us:
1.Physical damage is always considered substantial interference
2.Non physical damage will only be considered substantial interference if it makes it physically unpleasant to be on the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fearn v tate gallery

A

There must be some ‘give and take’ between neighbours. To be an unlawful interference Ds use of the land must go beyond whats common and ordinary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sturges v Bridgeman

A

Example of locality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Halsey v esso petroleum

A

Example of duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is private nuisance defined

A

Defined in common law as an indirect, substantial and unlawful interference with a persons land