Consideration Flashcards
What must consideration be
Consideration must be sufficient, but need not be adequate
Chapell v nestle co
Consideration must be sufficient but it need not be adequate
Thomas v thomas
The value of each party’s consideration need not be equal
Jones v padvatton
Giving up something of value is valid consideration
White v Bluett
Consideration which has no economic value is not good consideration
Re mardle
Past consideration is not good consideration
Lampleigh v Braithwaite
Past consideration is good consideration where it has been provided at the promises request
Re caseys patents
Past consideration is good consideration where it has been provided in a employer/employee setting
Collins v Godfrey
Performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Glasbrook bros v Glamgrangan
Going beyond the existing legal duty is good consideration
Stilk v myrick
Performing an existing consideration duty is not good consideration
Houstley v ponsoby
Going beyond an existing contractual duty is good
Williams v Roffey bros
If performing an existing contractual duty provides practical benefits this is good consideration
Scotson v pegg
Fulfilling an existing contractual duty owed to a 3rd party can amount to valid consideration for a new contract