RPA2 Module 11 Flashcards
(a) Why should a plan sponsor establish a formal retirement plan committee, and
(b) who comprises the membership of this committee?
(a) A plan sponsor should establish a formal retirement plan committee that has responsibility regarding the governance and administration of the retirement plan. While this committee may not be responsible for actually performing any of the administrative functions or handling actual participant communication relative to the plan, the committee does delegate that responsibility to an appropriate party and provides oversight to ensure that the proper actions are happening in a timely fashion.
(b) The membership of this committee is generally fairly small. Three to five
individuals often are sufficient, and membership consists of key senior leaders of the organization. In a small company, it may consist of the company president and the senior financial and human resources officers. In a larger company, the membership may be the chief financial officer, the human resources vice president and the corporate counsel, plus two other organizational members from senior management.
What is the charge given to the retirement plan committee, and what are its
responsibilities?
The retirement plan committee should be authorized by the corporation with the charge to make all decisions necessary regarding the administration of the retirement plan. This committee determines the plan design, selects the service providers, meets with legal counsel and reviews the overall status of the plan.
As a committee, they meet at least annually but probably no more than quarterly—unless addressing some current, pressing issue. As an ongoing committee, the agenda focuses on investment performance review and administrative service provider review as well as addresses any legal or regulatory change that affects the retirement plan.
In some companies, the retirement plan committee also may review and approve any written policies and procedures that are developed to assist in the day-to-day administration of the plan. Other companies permit the human resources or benefits department to develop and implement those policies and procedures without formal approval by the committee.
Describe how the retirement plan committee delegates responsibilities to other
parties concerning the retirement plan.
A key function of the retirement plan committee is the delegation of responsibilities to other parties. This includes internal corporate delegation as well as the delegation of certain plan functions to external service providers such as a plan trustee, recordkeeper, actuary, investment manager and plan consultant.
Although a corporation may hire external entities to provide these services, this does not relieve the plan sponsor of fiduciary responsibility for these functions. Therefore, it is essential that the retirement plan committee understand clearly what these external service providers will and will not be doing relative to the administration of the plan.
What is a fidelity bond, and how does it offer protection to a plan sponsor?
A fidelity bond is a form of protection that covers policyholders for losses that are incurred as a result of fraudulent acts by individuals specified in the bond’s contract.
All qualified retirement plans are required to have a fidelity bond that covers at least 10% of the plan assets in case of loss to the plan because of criminal acts or embezzlement by any of the plan fiduciaries or other plan officials. The maximum required amount for the fidelity bond is $500,000 unless the plan holds employer securities, in which case the maximum is increased to $1 million.
It often is possible to have this fidelity bond added to the corporation’s existing fidelity bond, but care should be taken to ensure that the fidelity bond fully complies with Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) requirements.
What role does the retirement plan committee play in decisions regarding plan
design?
The retirement plan committee plays a substantive role in decisions regarding retirement plan design. The actual decision regarding the plan design is typically a key responsibility of the retirement plan committee.
While this decision should be made with advice supplied from consultants and legal advisors, it is important for the committee to determine the fit between the choice of various plan features and the unique benefit goals and human resource issues of the corporation.
The initial design of the plan is important, but time is more often spent on ongoing amendments to the plan
What is an amendment to a plan document, and why do amendments often result in additional plan changes?
An amendment to a plan document is a change or modification to the plan document that alters the operation of the plan. Such amendments are often driven by changes in the laws that occur on a continuing basis.
Most companies will use the opportunity presented when amendments are needed to comply with new legal requirements, to reevaluate other features in the plan or to determine whether other amendments should be implemented. Drafting, reviewing, implementing and communicating amendments is a costly process.
It not only involves legal costs but also adds the expense of distributing information to plan participants and changing other employee communications such as policy manuals and company websites. Sometimes a plan amendment necessitates changes to payroll systems and company procedures.
Often an amendment is communicated through issuance of a summary of material modification (SMM).
When new legislation occurs regarding retirement plans, when is the effective
date by which a plan sponsor must comply with the change, and how must the
sponsor comply with the law during the interim period before the plan document is amended?
Often, the effective date for any required change because of new legislation is the start of the following plan year after the legislation is passed by Congress, even though the plan document is not required to be amended for a period of up to two or three years.
For example, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) had several
provisions that became effective on the first day of the plan year that began on or after January 1, 2007. Even though these changes were expeditiously implemented as directed by PPA, the plan documents affected were not required to be formally amended until the last day of the plan year that began in 2009.
Therefore, a plan sponsor needed to operate in compliance with the terms of PPA for up to three years before the plan document was actually amended to reflect these changes.
New legislation creates two distinct challenges for a plan sponsor: First, the plan sponsor must determine what elements of the plan will be altered due to the new legislation. Second, the plan must be consistently administered according to the altered terms of the plan, in the same way that it will be after the amendment process has occurred.
A plan that ignores operating in a manner directed by the new legislation until the formal amendment deadline would be found to be out of compliance with the law. Failure to make these plan changes in a timely manner places the plan at risk of being penalized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or the Department of Labor (DOL). Therefore, a procedure should be established that clearly identifies how the plan will operate
during this interim period until the plan document has been formally amended.
How do policies and procedures work in conjunction with a plan document in the operation of a retirement plan?
While the plan document provides the formal legal structure and general operating policies of the plan, numerous other procedural elements require more in-depth plan features that need to be addressed that are not detailed in the plan document.
A well-managed plan will have a set of policies and procedures that guide the daily operation of the plan. There are some policies that every plan should have and that should be formally prepared, reviewed and maintained. These include an investment policy; policies regarding participant loans and hardship distributions, if applicable; and a policy regarding qualified domestic relations orders (QDROs).
Some of these policies, such as the investment policy, can be anticipated at the plan’s inception and should be in place at the start of plan operations. Other policies may be determined when a question or unique situation arises.
Does a retirement plan that permits participant-directed investments need an
investment policy? Explain.
An investment policy is needed for every type of plan, including a plan that permits participants to direct the investments in their own accounts. The investment policy is the written document outlining the guidelines for the structure, operation and decision making for the investments held by the retirement plan.
The investment policy would include such things as the selection criteria for the investment managers or mutual funds offered in the plan, the benchmarks that will be used to measure the performance of the investments, the process and criteria used to change an investment or fund offering, the frequency with which the investments will be reviewed (quarterly or annually) and how the investment fees are to be paid. If the
plan investments are not participant-directed, then the policy should include the targeted asset allocation and the frequency of rebalancing. If the investments are participant-directed, the policy should include the number of fund options permitted, the range of investment options allowed and the default investment option.
It also is important to specify whether any restrictions exist on certain types
of investments, such as establishing that no investments are permitted in hedge funds or in mutual funds that have a front-end load.
Describe the issues addressed in a retirement plan’s loan policy.
The loan policy is the guiding document that provides answers to many of the administrative issues that arise for plan loans. In addition to stating the statutory limits or plan limits (if different) regarding participant loans, this policy also provides guidance regarding how certain events will be handled.
For example, if a participant has an outstanding loan and then is terminated, what will happen? Will the plan permit the participant to continue making payments on the loan, or will the participant be required to repay the loan at that time or have the loan amount deemed to have been distributed (a taxable event)? By establishing policies in advance of situations, the staff administering the plan is able to provide consistent answers to questions from plan participants. This minimizes the risk that unfair treatment to one participant over another will occur. Participant loans continue to be
an area of scrutiny by IRS during audits, so proper administration is very important.
Describe the types of issues addressed in a policy regarding hardship withdrawals.
A policy regarding hardship distributions should be in place if the plan permits these types of distributions. While the plan document will establish the minimum requirements regarding what qualifies as a hardship, the policy should include the following elements:
(a) How frequently are hardship distributions processed (monthly, quarterly or on an ad hoc basis)?
(b) Is there a minimum hardship withdrawal loan amount requirement (e.g.,
$1,000)?
(c) What will be acceptable proof to establish the hardship, and/or who will make the determination that there is in fact a hardship?
(d) What other sources of funds must a participant have used or attempted to use prior to applying for a hardship distribution?
Distinguish the differences between what is contained in the plan document and the policy document regarding similar plan features.
The difference between what is contained in the plan document regarding plan features, like loans or hardships, and what is contained in the policy often is confusing.
Generally, the elements within the policy are items that may change over
time because of changing aspects of the business, internal procedures or even government regulations. While it is important to have a consistent policy applied evenly to all participants, it also is important that a plan administrator be able to respond to changing conditions without having to amend the formal plan document frequently. The policy document serves as the guide for the day-to-day functions of the plan. Of course, the actual plan document is the controlling instrument, and any policy or procedure developed must agree with the terms of the plan document.
How does the use of service providers alter the legal liabilities of the plan
administrator?
Using various service providers generally does not change the fact that the company remains the plan administrator for the legal purposes of the plan document. The company is responsible for the actions of these service providers, so it is important that the company makes the selection carefully and monitors how the services are provided. The first step is to determine what elements should be performed by internal staff and which are better completed by external providers.
Depending on the size and nature of a company or organization, certain functions may be completed more easily by the plan sponsor. Over time, the particular mix of who is responsible for which pieces of the plan administration may change.
What is a request for proposal (RFP), and how is it utilized in selecting a plan
service provider?
An RFP is a formal written document distributed to vendors inviting them to
present their capabilities and place a bid with their pricing to become a service
provider to the plan. The RFP generally identifies the key items that will be critical to the decision to select one provider over another. Thus, each RFP differs, depending on the particular needs of the organization drafting the RFP.
What factors contribute to the success of the partnership between plan service
providers and plan sponsors?
The success of the partnership between plan service providers and plan sponsors depends on the ongoing communication among the various parties involved in the partnership as well as the quality and timeliness of the services being provided.
The plan sponsor retains ultimate responsibility regarding the legal compliance of the plan as well as for ensuring that the participants’ needs are being met by the plan service providers. Therefore, the plan sponsor needs to carefully monitor the actions of the service providers to ensure that they are administering the plan according to the terms of the plan document as well as adhering to the agreed-upon levels of service.
Many companies establish a practice of formally assessing the service
providers on a regular basis, such as every three to five years. In some cases, this may only be an internal review, while in other cases the plan sponsor may proceed with a full RFP process each time.