Robbery - Case Laws Flashcards

1
Q

R v Skivington

A

Claim alright as a defence to robbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Lapier

A

Robbery is complete, the time properties taken, even if momentary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Peat

A

Return does not negate the offence 

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Cox

A

Two elements
Physical element, custody or control
Mental element, combination of knowledge and intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Maihi

A

There must be a connection between the act of stealing, and three or violence. Both must be present. However, the term does not require that the act of stealing, and threat of violence be contemporaneous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Peneha v Police

A

Sufficient that the defendants acts forcibly interfere with the personal freedom, or a forcible power, or violent action or motion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DPP v Smith

A

Bodily harm means harm that is really serious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Joyce

A

Must establish at least two people physically present at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Galey

A

Being together means two or more person having the common intention to use their combined force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly