Road Traffic Offences Flashcards
Section 1 Driving Road Traffic Act 1988 – Causing Death by Dangerous
A person who causes the death of another person by driving a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place is guilty of an offence.
Section 1A Road Traffic Act 1988 – Causing Serious Injury by Dangerous Driving
A person who causes serious injury to another person by driving a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place is guilty of an offence.
S2 – Dangerous Driving
A person who drives a mechanically propelled vehicle dangerously on a road or other public place is guilty of an offence.
S2A – Meaning of Dangerous Driving
For the purposes of sections 1 and 2 above a person is to be regarded as driving dangerously if (and, subject to subsection (2) below, only if) —
the way he drives falls far below what would be expected of a competent and careful driver, and
it would be obvious to a competent and careful driver that driving in that way would be dangerous.
A person is also to be regarded as driving dangerously for the purposes of sections 1 and 2 above if it would be obvious to a competent and careful driver that driving the vehicle in its current state would be dangerous.
S2B – Causing Death by Careless or Inconsiderate Driving
A person who causes the death of another person by driving a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, is guilty of an offence.
S3 – Careless or Inconsiderate Driving
If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence.
S4 – Driving or Being in Charge, when Under Influence of Drink or Drugs
A person who, when driving or attempting to drive a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place, is unfit to drive through drink or drugs is guilty of an offence.
Without prejudice to subsection (1) above, a person who, when in charge of a mechanically propelled vehicle] which is on a road or other public place, is unfit to drive through drink or drugs is guilty of an offence.
S5 – Driving or Being in Charge with Alcohol Concentration Above Prescribed Limit
If a person—
(a) drives or attempts to drive a motor vehicle on a road or other public place, or
(b) is in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or other public place,
after consuming so much alcohol that the proportion of it in his breath, blood or urine exceeds the prescribed limit he is guilty of an offence.
Defence:
It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under subsection (1)(b) above to prove that at the time he is alleged to have committed the offence the circumstances were such that there was no likelihood of his driving the vehicle whilst the proportion of alcohol in his breath, blood or urine remained likely to exceed the prescribed limit.
Prescribed Limit
In Breath: 35 microgrammes per 100 millilitres of breath
In Blood: 80 milligrammes per 100 millilitres of blood
In Urine: 107 milligrammes per 100 millilitres of urine
S5A – Driving or Being in Charge with Concentration of Specified Controlled Drug Above Specified Limit
(1) This section applies where a person (“D”)—
drives or attempts to drive a motor vehicle on a road or other public place, or
is in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or other public place, and there is in D’s body a specified controlled drug.
D is guilty of an offence if the proportion of the drug in D’s blood or urine exceeds the specified limit for that drug.
Defences
It is a defence for a person (“D”) charged with an offence under this section to show that—
(a) the specified controlled drug had been prescribed or supplied to D for medical or dental purposes,
(b) D took the drug in accordance with any directions given by the person by whom the drug was prescribed or supplied, and with any accompanying instructions (so far as consistent with any such directions) given by the manufacturer or distributor of the drug, and
(c) D’s possession of the drug immediately before taking it was not unlawful under section 5(1) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (restriction of possession of controlled drugs) because of an exemption in regulations made under section 7 of that Act (authorisation of activities otherwise unlawful under foregoing provisions).
S6(6) - Failing to Provide (cooperate with a preliminary test)
A person commits an offence if without reasonable excuse he fails to co-operate with a preliminary test in pursuance of a requirement imposed under this section.
Power of Arrest
A power of arrest is provided by the Road Traffic Act for any person who fails a preliminary roadside test or fails to co-operate with such a test. This is NOT an arrest power conveyed under PACE. It is only an offence under PACE once a person fails or fails to co-operate with the further test at a police station.
Section 28 Road Traffic Act 1988
A person who rides a cycle on a ac dangerously is guilty of
an offence.
Section 29 Road Traffic Act 1988
If a person wides a cycle on a road without wandattemion,
or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the
road, he is guilty of an offence.
Section 35 of the Road Traffic Act 1988
Where a constable or a traffic officer is for the time being engaged
in the regulation of traffic in a road, a person or propelling a
Vehicle who neglects or refuses
• (a) to stop the vehicle, or
• (b) to make it proceed in, or keep to, a particular line of traffic,
• when directed to do so by the constable in the execution of his duty
or the traffic officer (as the case maybe) is guilty of an offence.
Section 36 of the Road Traffic Act 1988
Operational Policing- Policing (
Where a traffic sign, being a sign -
(a) of the prescribed size, colour and type, or
(b) of another character authorised by the national authority
under the provision in that behalf of the Road Traffic Regulations
Act 1984,
has been lawfully placed on or near a, a person or
propelling a vehicle who fails to comply with the indication given
by the sign is guilty of an offence.
Section 22 of the Road Traffic Act 1988
• If a person in charge of a vehicle causes or art the
vehicle or a trailer drawn by it to remain at rest on a in
a position
or in such condition or in such circumstances as to involve a
danger of injury to other persons using the road,
• he is guilty of an offence.
Section 89 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984
• A person who drives a motor vehicle on a a at a speed
exceeding a limit imposed by or under any enactment to
which this section applies shall be guilty of an offence
Section 1, Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988
For certain road traffic offences the driver must be given a warning that he faces prosecution. This is done by issuing a Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP). Common offences requiring a NIP include: dangerous driving, careless driving, speeding and disobeying traffic signs and traffic signals. The NIP can be given verbally by the police at the time of the offence or a formal letter can be sent by post.
NIP
Issued 14 days
- Dangerous or careless driving/cycling
- Speeding
- Leaving a vehicle in a dangerous place
- Failing to conform with the indication of a police officer directing traffic or with a traffic sign
Section 59 Police Reform Act 2002 anti- social behaviour
• constable in uniform and a Community Support Officer, if
their designation includes this section, may seize a motor
vehicle where they have reasonable grounds for believing that
it is being used or has been used
• In contravention of Section 3 Road Traffic Act 1988 (careless or
inconsiderate driving) or Section 34 Road Traffic Act 1988
(prohibition of off-road driving), and
• Is causing, or is likely to cause, alarm, distress or annoyance to
members of the public.
Applies to person and the vehicle separately warning last 12 month
Anyone drives that car like that again it will be Seized.
Seizing vehicles
• Before seizing the motor vehicle they must warn
the person who appears to be the driver that they
will seize it if that use continues or
• Is repeated and
• If it appears to them that the use has continued or
• Been repeated after the warning they may then
seize and remove the vehicle.
A suggested wording is :
You are/have been driving/ riding a motor vehicle in
a careless or inconsiderate manner contrary to
section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 in a manner
which is causing/ has been causing/ or is likely to
cause alarm, distress or annoyance to members of the
public
I must warn you that if you continue to drive
the vehicle in the same way or if you drive
another vehicle in the same way on any other
occasion, that vehicle can be seized under
Section 59 of the Police Reform Act 2002.
No Power of Arrest for failing to stop under Section 59
• Failing to stop the vehicle as per Section 59(a)
of this sub section is a summary offence
contrary to Section 56(6) of the Act