Risk factors for drug use Flashcards
What do we know about adolescence and drug use?
> Initiation to drug use typically occurs during adolescence
- experience is normative
> A minority escalate to frequent or problematic drug use
> Adolescence = peak period for onset of abuse and dependence
> Very few people who don’t initiate drug use in adolescence will develop abuse or dependence
What does animal research show on the sensitivity to drug exposure in adolescents vs adults?
Adolescents are
> Less sensitive to
- aversive effects of acute alcohol intoxication
- sedation, hangover, ataxia
> More sensitive to
- alcohol’s effects on social facilitation
- alcohol disrupting spatial memory
-> adolescent brain is uniquely sensitive to drug exposure
When talking about cause of drug use, what is a cause?
An event / occurrence that increases the probability of the effect
- e.g. cigarette smoking increases the probability of lung cancer but not everyone who smokes develops it
What are the six categorised risk factors for drug use according to Hawkins et al. (1992)?
- Laws and norms
(e. g. economic deprivation) - Neighbourhood
(e. g. disorganisation, alcohol outlets) - Peers and school
(affiliating with drug using peers is a prominent risk factor) - Family
(conflict, low bonding) - Early onset of drug use
(increases risk of escalation) - Individual
(e. g. early and persistent behavioural problems)
What are the effects of specific risk factors?
Risk factor effects independent of the effects of potential confounding covariates
Why is longitudinal/prospective research valuable in identifying risk factors for drug use?
- Increases accuracy of the timing of events
- Can access large number of potentially confounding covariates
What is the Christchurch health and development study (Fergusson et al., 1996)?
Longitudinal study in New Zealand on childhood sexual abuse and drug abuse/dependence
> Birth cohort: 1265 children born May-August 1977
> Data collected at:
- birth
- 3 months
- one year
- annual interval until 16
- ages 18, 21, 25, 30, 35
> Reports from:
- parents
- self-reports
- teachers
- significant others
- official records (hospital and police)
What were the findings of the Christchurch health and development study (Fergusson et al., 1996)?
> Approx. 1/6 of cohort has been exposed to childhood sexual abuse (CSA) before age 16
> 40% of young people who had experienced CSA with intercourse reported history of alcohol/drug abuse/dependence
(vs. 12.5% for those who didn’t experience CSA)
> Strong associations between CSA (esp. intercourse) and risks of alcohol/drug abuse and dependence
- even after control of wide range of potential covariates
Which elements need to be considered when identifying risk factors?
- Effect size
- Relative risk
- Base rate of exposure to risk factor within the population
What is the population attributable risk (PAR)?
Number/proportion of cases that would not occur if the factor was eliminated
What does the attributable risk depend on?
- Prevalence of the risk factor
- Strength of its association with the outcome
What was the population attributable risk (PAR) between childhood sexual abuse and alcohol/drug abuse or dependence, in the Christchurch health and development study (Fergusson and Horwood, 2001)?
10% of drug abuse would not occur if childhood sexual abuse (i.e. risk factor) was eliminated
What are protective factors (Rutter, 1985)?
Factors that reduce risks within a high risk group
- these factors may not be generally related to risk throughout the population
What are the elements underlying risks in a group?
Relationship between:
- risk factors
- protective factors
- risk of adverse outcomes
What were the identified protective factors in the Christchurch health and development study?
Those who did not develop adjustment difficulties (including those who experienced CSA and those who didn’t) had:
- fewer affiliations with delinquent peers
- more caring/supportive parenting
What did the latent class analysis reveal in the Christchurch health and development study?
Multiple problem teenagers were more likely to experience each of the disadvantageous family features