Rise Of The Centre - Suppression Of The Local Flashcards
Hypotheses
Early modern government was based on consent and negotiation out of necessity
Violence was part of the political process
More effective monopolies of violence increased the state’s negotiating power
Three views of the development of the early modern (english) state
Centralisation
Incorporation
Repression
Centralisation
G. Elton
Centralisation theses
Importance of court and council (esp Thomas Cromwell)
Politics is central vs. Local interest
Incorporation
The state is a cultural resource
Alignment of the state and particular interests
‘Amateur, part-time and unsalaried’ (mark goldie)
C. 1700 - 5% of adult males governing in any one year (50% increase in a decade)
Repression
State is an inherently violent enterprise
Obedience and allegiance enforced through violent acts - encourage through violent display
1530-1630 - up to 75,000 people executed in england
Synthesis of the three positions
Negotiated state power
Importance of power brokers
Discretion - and discretionary use of force
Sources of tension
Venal offices Taxation Religious impositions Billeting Ancient liberties
Forms of political violence
Environmental violence - hedge and ditch breaking
Rioting
Symbolic violence
The moral economy of the crowd
E.P. Thompson
Crowds were not irrational, riots were not random
Rebel alliances
Most successful revolts link gentry with the masses
Attempts to wed broader political causes to local revolts - ultimately delegitimising
The empire strikes back
Repressive response from states
Use of foreign or external troops
Responsive capability increases with availability of troops in garrisons
Success and failure?
Violent riots had some success (Maldon grain riot 1629, Naples rebellion 1585, midland rising 1607)
Feedback loops
Change with constraints
Conclusion
Government rested on the negotiation of common values and principles
Violence was part of the negotiation of these principles
The state gained the upper hand in violence across our period