Review Sheet - Final Exam Flashcards
Durkheim and structural-functionalist paradigm:
Culture is a positive aspect of society that brings us together. How culture operates to meet human needs. You could say Super Bowl is a part of structural functionalism. Ignores minorities. Ignores diversity. That we all wants to be a part of something. Ignores social change.
Marx and social-conflict paradigm:
Culture maintains inequality. Emphasized how capitalism is integrated in culture and society. Ignores the way that cultural patters integrates members of society.
Symbolic-interaction paradigm:
Symbolic interaction is a micro-level orientation, a close-up focus on social interaction in specific situations. At the micro-level, a sporting event for example is a complex, face-to-face interaction. Symbolic interaction does not focus on race, gender and sexuality in the same way.
Weber and interpretive sociology:
Focuses on the need to understand the meanings of symbols and social interactions. The study of society that focuses on discovering the meanings people attach to their social world. People’s understanding of their actions and their surrounding. Qualitative data.
Critical sociology:
Based on the idea that all research is political. Critical sociology, by contrast, is the study of society that focuses on the need for social change. “Should we have this much inequality?” or “Should society exist in its present form?
Scientific sociology:
Based on Structural Functionalism. The sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) is the study of science as a social activity, especially dealing with the social conditions and effects of science, and with the social structures and processes of scientific activity.
Caste vs. Class:
Caste Systems are based on birth (ascription); permit little or no social mobility; shape a person’s entire life, including occupation and marriage; are common in traditional, agrarian societies. Class Systems are based on both birth (ascription) and meritocracy (individual achievement); permit some social mobility; are common in modern industrial and postindustrial societies.
Meritocracy:
The concept of meritocracy refers to social stratification based on personal merit. A pure meritocracy has never existed, but in such a system social position would depend entirely on a person’s performance, reflecting both ability and effort. Such a system would have ongoing social mobility, blurring social categories as individuals continuously move up or down in the system, depending on their latest performance.
Income vs. Wealth:
Income is only one part of a person’s or family’s wealth, the total value of money and other assets, minus outstanding debts. Wealth—including stocks, bonds, and real estate—is distributed even more unequally than income.
David-Moore thesis:
The functional analysis claiming that social stratification has beneficial consequences for the operation of society. the greater the functional importance of a position, the more rewards a society attaches to it. This strategy promotes productivity and efficiency because rewarding important work with income, prestige, power, or leisure encourages people to do these jobs and to work better, longer, and harder. In short, unequal rewards (the foundation of social stratification) benefit society as a whole.
Blame the individual:
The culture of poverty thesis states that poverty is caused by shortcomings in the poor themselves (Oscar Lewis).
Blame society:
Poverty is caused by society’sunequal distribution of wealth and lack of good jobs (William Julius Wilson).
Feminism (3 types):
Liberal - seeks change only to ensure equality of opportunity. Socialist - supports an end to social classes and to family gender roles that encourage “domestic slavery.” Radical feminism - supports an end to the family system.
Intersection theory:
The key insight of intersection theory is that there are multiple systems of stratification based on race, class, and gender, and these systems do not operate independently of one another. On the contrary, these dimensions of inequality intersect and interact. Obviously, women are already treated unequally but women from hispanic background is treated even more unequally.
Structural functional analysis of gender:
Society encourages gender conformity by instilling in men and women a fear that straying too far from accepted standards of masculinity or femininity will cause rejection by the opposite sex