Review and critique what recent research into BCT has told us about intervening to change HB and how this could be used to develop an intervention Flashcards
Intro
- BCTs
- -examples
- -aims
- -issues
- -definitions, delay
- -taxonomies
Paragraph 1
- Abraham and Michie (2008, 2013)
- Michie et al (2012) and Michie, Hyder, Walia and West (2011b)
- French et al (2014), Michie et al (2011)
- Orlander at al (2013), Webb et al (2010)
Paragraph 2
- Michie, Abraham, Whittington and Gupta (2009)
- Henrich et al (2015)
Paragraph 3
- Milne, Orbell and Sheeran (2002)
- full factorial design
- Webb, Joseph, Yardley and Michie (2010)
- Murphy (1996)
- Bishop et al (2015)
Paragraph 4
- contexts
- -school, Kahn et al (2012)
- -Worksite, Anderson et al (2009)
- -Healthcare, Stead, Berson and Lancaster (2008)
Conclusion
- BCT
- Taxonomies
- Combinations
- Context
Abraham and Michie (2008, 2013)
developed a taxonomy of 26 different behavioural change techniques, in order to provide a common language to describe techniques making up an intervention. This was done to increase the likelihood of replicating studies and other interventions, which increases the reliability which intervention / behaviour change technique effectively causes changes to behaviour. Since 2008 the list has been expanded to incorporate a wider range of techniques with the latest version in 2013 incorporating 93 distinct behavioural change techniques.
Michie et al (2012)
Taxonomy lists also specify specific health behaviours such as alcohol intake
Michie, Hyder, Walia and West (2011b)
Taxonomy lists also specify specific health behaviours such as smoking
French et al (2014)
conducted a meta-analysis of 16 studies investigated which BCTs were most effective at changing physical activity in older adults using Michie et al’s (2011) taxonomy of BCTs
Orlander et al (2013); Webb et al (2010)
Barrier Identification/Problem Solving to be one of the most effective behavioural change techniques for changing physical activity
Michie, Abraham, Whittington and Gupta (2009)
self-monitoring is the most useful behavioural change technique, while prompting self-talk seems to be the least useful
Henrich et al (2015)
self-monitoring was particularly effective in improving irritable bowel syndrome symptoms and well-being
Milne, Orbell and Sheeran (2002)
conducted a study that was designed to increase the likelihood of partaking in at least 20 minutes of exercise. There were 3 groups, a control group, a group that received a motivational message, and a group that received a motivation message and then asked to form an Implementation intention regarding when and where they would exercise. At follow up 38% of the control group and 35% of the group that only received a motivational message reported exercising. However, those who had also been asked to form implementation intentions reported a 91% increase in exercising.
Webb, Joseph, Yardley and Michie (2010)
interventions that had more techniques were more likely to produce greater increases in physical activity