Research Terms Flashcards
External Validity
The extent to which an effect in research can be generalized to other
populations, settings, and treatment variables
Concurrent Validity
The extent to which the results of a particular test, or measurement,
correspond to those of a previously established measurement for the same construct.
You want to make sure the test accurately measures what it is supposed to measure.
One way to do this is to look for other tests that have already been found to be valid
measures of your construct, administer both tests, and compare the results of the tests
to each other.
Predictive Validity:
Predictive Validity: This involves testing a group of subjects for a certain construct, and
then comparing them with results obtained at some point in the future. For example: You
want to predict the risk factors for High School Dropout. You create a survey for 10th
graders and then later look at high school dropout rates of the surveyed students to see
if the results predicted dropping out.
Internal Validity
The confidence that can be placed in the cause-and-effect relationship
in a study.
Reliability
Reliability is the overall consistency of a measure. Higher reliability indicates a
measure will produce statistically similar results under consistent experimental conditions. Ex.
If two different social workers administer the same interview to a client, do they get the same
results?
Validity
The degree to which a tool measures what it claims to measure. For example: the
Beck Depression Inventory is supposed to measure a person’s level of depression. It has validity
if it measures that. It would not have validity if, in reality, it measures a person’s level of anxiety
and not their level of depression.
Statistical Significance
If a result is statistically significant, that means it’s unlikely to be explained solely by chance or random factors. In other words, a statistically significant result has a very low chance of occurring if there were no true effect in a research study.
The p value, or probability value, tells you the statistical significance of a finding. In most studies, a p value of 0.05 or less is considered statistically significant, but this threshold can also be set higher or lower.
Experimental/Intervention Group
In research, a collection of subjects who are matched
and compared with a control group in all relevant respects, except that they are also subject to a
specific variable being tested (that is, they receive the new treatment/intervention).
Randomized Controlled Trial:
n experimental design that measures the effect of an
intervention by randomly assigning participants to either an experimental/intervention group or a
control group.
For example, a new drug to treat depression is developed. Participants are randomly
assigned to either a control group (receiving a placebo/sugar pill) or the treatment group
(receiving the new drug). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is given at the beginning
and end of treatment to see whether the treatment group saw a greater decrease in
depressive symptoms than the control group.
Quasi-Experimental Design
The prefix ‘quasi’ means ‘resembling.’ So this is a design that
resembles a randomized controlled trial, but does not involve the random assignment to a
control group and experimental group (instead, it allows the researcher to control the
assignment to the treatment and control groups using some criteria other than random
assignment). It is commonly used in field research where random assignment is difficult or not
possible.
● You can use the exact same example as the randomized controlled trial with one
difference: the researcher places the participants in the treatment or control group using
some other criteria besides random assignment.
Single Subject Design:
Single Subject Design: Research where the subject serves as their own control, rather than
using another individual/group.
● For example, a social worker administers the BDI to client(s) before beginning a specific
treatment to establish a baseline, and then administers the BDI again after receiving the
treatment to see if the treatment was effective in decreasing their BDI score..
Retrospective Design:
Retrospective Design: In a retrospective design, participants are asked to retrospect (literally,
to ‘look back’) and try to remember what they were like at an earlier time point.
● For example, researchers could ask older teenagers how they were disciplined as kids.
Cross-sectional Design:
Cross-sectional Design: In a cross-sectional design, researchers collect data at a single point
in time from participants of different ages.
● For example, researchers might hypothesize that people become more traditional in their
attitudes and more resistant to social change as they get older. To study this, they might
get participants in their 20s, 40s, and 60s to complete a measure of traditionalism and
then test whether there is a positive correlation between age and traditionalism.
Longitudinal Design:
Longitudinal Design: In a longitudinal design, the same people are measured at different
ages.
● For example, researchers could follow the development of babies who experienced
developmental delays.
Cross-sequential Design
Cross-sequential Design: A cross-sequential design is a combination of cross-sectional and
longitudinal designs. At the first point, groups of people from several different ages are
measured. If the design were to stop there, it would be a simple cross-sectional design, but
these groups are then followed over time, incorporating the longitudinal aspect.