Research Methods Year 2 (not finished) Flashcards
Define ‘case study’
The detailed and in-depth study of a case of an individual, group or organisation.
What is triangulation?
When several data sets/pieces of research are analysed to reach a conclusion
- Increases validity and reliability
Give two strengths of using case studies
- Longitudinal studies allow a greater depth of information to be collected and it is possible to see change over time for a particular variable
- Allows a researcher to investigate rare or unusual behaviours
- Lack of representation is not an issue as it is designed for an individualistic approach
- Several research methods can be used within one case study, meaning data can be both qualitative and quantitative - increased validity and reliability (linked to triangulation)
- High ecological validity as most are carried out in ‘real’ environments
Give two weaknesses of using case studies
- Time consuming and expensive
- Not representative or generalisable - contradicts the nomothetic approach of science
- Longitudinal studies usually lead to high drop-out rates
- Researcher Bias - ppts could pick up on the aims of the study (if they were hidden) and display demand characteristics or social desirability
- Volunteer Bias - ppts may try to manipulate the researcher, especially if they had built up a rapport over time
- Could be predeterminist?
Give one example of a case study
- Freud’s Case Study of Little Hans - Believed that Little Hans’ fear of horses was actually the displaced fear of his father created by castration anxiety.
- Thigpen and Cleckley’s Case Study of Christine Sizemore - Study of Sizemore’s DID, with the analysis of Eve White, Eve Black and Jane using various methods including interviews, psychometric testing, EEGs and observations
Who postulated the principle of falsification?
Karl Popper
What is the principle of falsification?
- A hypothesis/theory is only scientific if it can be proven false
- Scientists should actively seek data to ‘test a theory to destruction’ rather than simply data that proves it as it is easier to falsify than verify
- If something cannot be falsified, it is a pseudo-science e.g. Freud’ Psychodynamics
- Popper uses the example of swans: the statement “all swans are white” would be almost impossible to verify, but very easy to falsify by finding a single black swan
Which scholar developed the concept of scientific paradigms?
Thomas Kuhn
According to Kuhn, what is the difference between physical sciences and social sciences?
- Physical sciences have a single unifying paradigm that is able to shift based on new evidence
- Social sciences have several contradictory paradigms, so there is not a single theory to test new evidence against - this suggests that psychology is unscientific
Is a nomothetic approach or an idiographic approach considered more scientific? Why?
A nomothetic approach is more scientific
- It seeks to create generalisable laws, meaning it has predictive power (i.e. it can make behaviour predicable)
- Idiographic approaches focus on individual experience, meaning they are not generalisable and have limited predictive power
According to Kuhn, what are three things a discipline must have to be classed as a science?
Does psychology have them all?
- Shared set of assumptions - No: Psychology has several approaches, each with their own assumptions about behaviour
- Shared set of scientific methods - Yes: Psychology uses the scientific method to systematically construct and test hypotheses (e.g. experiments)
- Shared set of specialist terminology - Yes: For example, independent and dependent variables are used in all sciences
Why can ethical considerations impede objectivity in research?
- To analyse variables in a completely objective way, they must be isolated from as many extraneous variables as possible.
- As psychology is the study of the HUMAN mind, this is almost impossible to do in an ethical way. For example, you cannot separate MZ twins purely to research the nature/nurture debate.
- Animals have been used to mitigate some of the human ethical issues, but animal ethics still apply, and you can’t necessarily generalise animal findings to humans.
What does operationalisation mean, and why is it important?
- Operationalisation means making variables measurable e.g. no. of words recalled, seconds, metres
- It is important because operationalising variables makes them testable, which is a cornerstone of the scientific method
What is the significance level typically used in psychology and why?
The 5% level
- There must only be a 5% chance that the results of a test are down to coincidence
- Seen as a balance between Type I and Type II Errors
What is a Type I Error and how may they occur?
A false positive result - not being cautious enough
- Usually caused by using a significance level that is too lenient, meaning the null is wrongfully rejected