Forensic Psychology (unfinished) Flashcards
Top Down Approach
USA based typology, Starts with the big picture and then builds up the details afterward.
FBI Approach To Top Down Typology Of Offender Profiling
1970’s - gathered data from 36 sexually motivated killers. 4 stages to offender profiling:
1) Data assimilation
2) Crime scene classification - organised or disorganised
3) Crime reconstruction - hypothesis on how the crime took place
4) Profile generation - likely characteristics of the offender
Organised/Disorganised Offender
Research - Hazelwood & Douglas, lust murderers are mainly categorised by two types.
Organised Offenders - Characteristics of murder include: a planned crime, victim is a targeted stranger, attempts to control the victims. Characteristics of offender include: above average IQ, socially and sexually competent, follows media coverage of the crime.
Disorganised Offenders - Characteristics of murder include: little planning or preparation, minimum use of constraint, little attempt to hide the evidence. Characteristics of offender include: sexually and socially inadequate, frightened or confused at the time of the attack, unskilled occupation or unemployed.
Evaluation Of The Top Down Approach
- Can only be applied to sexually motivated serial killers i.e. not generalisable
- Alison (2002) based on outdated theories of a stable personality. External factors also have an influence.
- Reductionist, organised to disorganised more of a scale, can have features of both.
Crime
Breaking the law
Deviance
Breaking social norms
Cultural issues in defining crime
Ethnocentric research, e.g. age of criminal responsibility differs between countries.
Historical issues in defining crime
Definitions change over time, e.g. homosexuality didn’t become legal in Britain until 1967.
Hazelwood and Douglas
Published an account of the lust murderer. Suggested that they can be categorised into 2 types: the organised offender and the disorganised offender.
Allison (2002)
The top down typology is based on outdated theories that the personality is stable. External factors can have an impact upon a persons actions and behaviours.
Bottom Up Approach To Offender Profiling
UK based, created by Canter (1990). Looks for consistencies in offenders behaviour at the time of the crime. No initial assumptions are made. Utilised computer databases, in particular smallest space analysis. Central to the approach is the theory of interpersonal coherence which means that the behaviour of the offender at the time of the crime is comparable to their behaviour in everyday life. Also includes geographical profiling.
Canter (1990)
Created the bottom up approach for offender profiling. Analysed the geographical details of 3 murders of women near railway stations and was able to draw up a significantly accurate profile of the offender (John Duffy).
Canter’s Circle Theory (1993)
Proposed two models of offender behaviour.
1) Marauders - commit their crimes close to where they live or feel secure (usually disorganised offenders)
2) Commuters - Commit their crimes away from where they live (usually organised offenders)
Research Support For Bottom Up Approach
- Canter and Heritage (1990), analysed 66 sexual assault cases using Smallest Space Analysis and identified clear common patterns of behaviour.
- Lundrigan and Canter (2001), collated evidence from 120 murder cases and found that the offenders home base was located in the centre of the crime scene pattern.
- Copson (1995), 83% of police forces found the profile to be useful.
Evaluation For The Bottom Up Approach
+ Scientific due to use of computer databases
+ Wider applications, can be applied to crimes other than sexually motivated serial killers.
- Only lead to an accurate identification of the offender in 3% of cases.
- Profile can be misleading, e.g. in the case of Rachel Nickell
Biological Explanations Of Crime
1) Atavistic Form
1b) Body Type Theory
2) Neural Explanations
3) Genetic Explanations
1) Atavistic Form
Lombroso (1876), Criminality is inherited and people can be born criminal. They can be distinguished by particular features such as a large jaw, hard shifty eyes or an upturned nose.
1b) Body Type Theory
Sheldon (1949), found that male delinquents were more likely to be mesomorph than male students of a similar age.
Lombroso
Atavistic Form - Biological explanation of crime
Studied 383 dead Italian criminals and 3839 living ones and found that 40% of them had atavistic features.
Sheldon
Body Type Theory - Biological explanation of crime
Evaluation Of Atavistic Form (And Body Type Theory)
+ Beginning of offender profiling
+ Scientific Method, evidence based approach
- Methodological Flaws, did not use a control group
- Scientific Racism
- Open to bias
- Physical differences may be due to other factors such as poor diet.
- Lacks temporal validity