Research Methods (Research Methods) Flashcards

1
Q

strucLab experiment is..

A

IV is directly manipulated under controlled setting to measure the impact on a DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Field experiment is

A

IV is directly manipulated in natural settings to measure the impact on a DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Natural experiment is

A

The CHANGE in an IV is natural and would have occurred without the presence of the researcher (e.g. before and after a natural disaster - no direct manipulation by a researcher) DV is measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

a Quasi experiment is

A

IV is already occurring (e.g. ethnicity) and so cannot be directly manipulated - the impact on DV is measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strength of a lab experiment

A

controlled conditions increase reliability and internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weakness of a lab experiment

A

setting isn’t natural = behaviour isn’t natural and results lack ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strength of a field experiement

A

Higher ecological valdity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

weakness of a field experiment

A

lacks control and internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

strength of a natural experiment

A

high external validity, unique study opportunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

weakness of a natural experiment

A

rare, less likelihood of causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

strength of a quasi experiment

A

unique insight free from manipulation (less demand characteristics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

weakness of a quasi experiment

A

cannot randomly allocate - less chance of causality (participant variables)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Naturalistic observation is

A

conducted in natural settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Controlled obervation is..

A

conducted in controlled settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Covert observation is..

A

participants are unaware they are being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Overt observation is…

A

participants are aware they are being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Participant observation is…

A

observer is part of the observed group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Non-participant observation is..

A

observer is not part of the observed group

19
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of naturalistic observations..

A

+ natural behaviour
- uncontrolled EVs

20
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of covert observations

A

+ Natural behaviour
- ethical issues

21
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of participant observations

A

+ increased insight (validity)
- loss of objectivity

22
Q

Unlike experiments observations have no…

A

IV

23
Q

Self report techniques are..

A

participants explain their own thoughts, feelings or behaviours (questionnaire/interview)

24
Q

A questionnaire is..

A

A written set of questions (or items) to assess thoughts and experiences

25
Q

Questionnaires can contain open questions; true or false

A

True

26
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of a questionnaire

A

+ cost effective to gather large datasets quickly and easy to analyse
- limited/socially desirable responses

27
Q

An interview where there are no set questions - only the topic is set

A

Unstructured interview

28
Q

An interview where all questions are pre-determined

A

Structured interview

29
Q

An interview where some questions are pre-determined but researchers can ask follow up questions as needed

A

Semi-structured interview

30
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of a structured interview

A

+ Easy to replicate
- limits richness of data

31
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of an unstructured interview

A

+ rich in depth data
- increased bias and hard to compare/replicate

32
Q

A correlation measures..

A

relationships

33
Q

The variables in a correlation are called

A

Co-variables

34
Q

The three outcomes of a correlational study are;

A

positive, negative and no correlation

35
Q

Correlations cannot guarantee what..

A

Causation! (a relationship, not a different or affect - always could be 3rd variables)

36
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of a correlational study

A

+ starting point for future research, quick and easy as uses secondary data often
- is not causation, always a risk of 3rd variables, can be misused

37
Q

A case study is

A

an indepth study of one or a small group of people

38
Q

Case studies can be carried out over a long period - this is called

A

Longitudinal research

39
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of case studies

A

+ in depth, can be longitudinal and use lots of measures to understand the individual so can check for concurrent validity
- cannot be replicated, many EVs, subjective

40
Q

A content anaylsis is

A

used to quantify qualitative data by changing it into frequencies using coding

41
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of content analysis

A

+ useful, ethical, reliable (inter-rater)
- hard to establish objective coding units, loses richness of data, time consuming

42
Q

Thematic analysis is

A

a qualitative method which identifies, analyses and reports themes (patterns) within data

43
Q

1 strength and 1 weakness of thematic analysis

A

+ useful, check concurrent data as you apply themes to new data sets, keeps richness of data
- Subjective, time consuming