Research methods key terms Flashcards
Aim
A statement of what the researcher(s) intend to find out in a research study
debriefing
a post-research interview designed to inform participants of the true nature of the study and to restore them to the state they were in at the start of the study. It may also be used to gain useful feedback about the procedures in the study. Debriefing is not an ethical issue; it is a means of dealing which ethical
ethical issues
concern questions of right and wrong. They arise in research where there are conflicting sets of values between researchers and participants concerning the goals, procedures or outcomes of a research study
experiment
a research method where causal conclusions can be drawn because an independent variable has been deliberately manipulated to observe the causal effect on the dependent variable
extraneous variables
do not vary systematically with the IV and therefore do not act as an alternative IV but may have an effect on the dependent variable. They are nuisance variables that muddy the waters and make it more difficult to detect a significant effect
hypothesis
a precise and testable statement about the assumed relationship between variables. Operationalisation is a key part of making the statement testable
independent variable (IV)
some event that is directly manipulated by an experimenter in order to test its effect on another variable - the dependent variable (DV)
informed consent
participants must be given comprehensive information concerning the nature and purpose of the research and their role in it, in order that they can make an informed decision about whether to participate
operationalise
ensuring that variables are in a form that can easily be tested. a concept such as ‘educational attainment’ needs to be specified more clearly if we are going to investigate it. e.g. it might be operationalised as ‘GCSE grade in Maths’
standardised procedures
a set of procedures that are the same for all participants in order to be able to repeat the study. This includes standardised instructions - the instructions given to participants to tell them how to perform the task
confounding variable
a variable under study that is not the IV but which varies systematically with the IV. Changes in the dependent variable may be due to the confounding variable rather than the IV, and therefore the outcome is meaningless. To ‘confound’ means to cause confusion
control
refers to the extent to which any variable is held constant or regulated by a researcher
external validity
the degree to which a research finding can be generalised: to other settings (ecological validity); to other groups of people (population validity); over time (historical validity)
ecological validity
the degree to which a research finding can be generalised to other settings
population validity
the degree to which a research finding can be generalised to other groups of people
historical validity
the degree to which a research finding can be generalised over time
extraneous variables
do not vary systematically with the IV and therefore do not act as an alternative IV but may have an effect on the DV. They are nuisance variables that muddy waters and make it more difficult to detect significant effect
internal validity
the degree to which an observed effect was due to the experimental manipulation rather than other factors such as confounding/ extraneous variables
mundane realism
refers to how a study mirrors the real world. the research environment is realistic to the degree to which experiences encountered in the research environment will occur in the real world
validity
refers to whether an observed effect is a genuine one
confederate
an individual in a study who is not a real participant and has been instructed on how to behave by the investigator
directional hypothesis
states the direction of the predicted difference between two conditions or two groups of participants
non directional hypothesis
predicts simply that there is a difference between two conditions or two groups of participants, without stating the direction of the difference
pilot study
a small scale trial run of a study to test any aspects of the design, with a view to making improvements
counterbalancing
an experimental technique used to overcome order effects when using a repeated measures design. Counterbalancing ensures that each condition is tested first or second in equal amounts
experimental design
a set of procedures used to control the influence of factors such as participant variables in an experiment
Independent groups design
participants are allocated to two (or more) groups representing different levels of the IV. Allocation is usually done using random techniques
Matched pairs design
pairs of participants are matched in terms of key variables such as age and IQ. One member of each pair is allocated to one of the conditions under test and the second person is allocated to the other condition
order effect
in a repeated measures design, an extraneous variable arising from the order in which conditions are presented, e.g. a practice effect or fatigue effect
random allocation
allocating participants to experimental groups or conditions using random techniques
repeated measures design
each participant takes part in every condition under test, i.e. each level of the IV
field experiment
A controlled experiment conducted outside a laboratory. The IV is still manipulated by the experimenter, and therefore casual relationships can be demonstrated. Field experiments tend to have lower internal validity (more difficult to control extraneous and confounding variables) and higher external validity (greater mundane realism). Participants are usually unaware that they are participating in an experiment; thus their behaviour may be more natural and they are less likely to respond to cues from the experimenter
laboratory experiment
an experiment carried out in a controlled setting. Lab experiments tend to have high internal validity because good control over all variables is possible. They tend to have low ecological validity because participants are aware they are being studied and also the tasks involved tend to be more artificial
natural experiment
a research method in which the experimenter has not manipulated the independent variable (IV) directly. The IV would not vary whether or not the researcher was interested. The researcher records the effect of the IV on a dependent variable (DV) - this DV may be measured in a lab. Strictly speaking, an experiment involves the deliberate manipulation of an IV and random allocation to conditions by the experimenter - neither of which apply to a natural experiment and therefore causal conclusions can only tentatively be drawn
Quasi experiments
studies that are ‘almost’ experiments. The IV is actually not something that varies at all - it is a condition that exists. The researcher records the effect of this ‘quasi-IV’ on a dependent variable (DV). As with a natural experiment, the lack of manipulation of the IV and the lack of random allocation means that causal conclusions can only tentatively be drawn