Research Methods Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Hypothesis

A

A precise, testable statement about the predicted outcome of the investigation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of hypotheses

A

Null - no diff
Non-directional - diff
Directional - specific diff, one higher etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Independent variable

A

The variable that is manipulated by the researcher. Assumed to have a direct effect on the dependent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dependent variable

A

The variable that the researcher measures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Extraneous variables

A

Any variable. which may effect the dependent variable other than the IV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Aim

A

A statement about the purpose of an investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Operationalising variables

A

Making something clear or unambiguous.

Process of devising a clear way of measuring something so that another person knows exactly what you have done.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Experimental designs

A

Independent groups
Repeated measures
Matched pairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of independent groups

A
  • many differences between groups - participant variables
  • require more participants
    + eliminates practice/fatigue effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of repeated measures

A
  • takes longer for each participant to complete experiment as do it twice
  • two sets of materials
  • order effects or practice effects
    + controls differences between people that could affect dv
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of matched pairs

A
  • impractical to match people at beginning of experiment
    +researcher gains control over extraneous variables
    +no problems with order effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Counterbalancing

In repeated measures

A

Half the participants do conditions in one particular order and the other half do the conditions in the opposite order - to balance possible order effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Types of experiment

A

Laboratory
Field
Natural
Quasi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Quantitative data

A

Information that is gathered in the course of an experiment that is in numerical form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Standard deviation

A

Average amount that the scores differ from the mean.

Less affected by outliers compared to the range. More sensitive version of dispersion compared to range. Harder to calculate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Measure of central tendency

A

Mean
Median
Mode

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Sampling of participants

A

Random
Opportunity
Volunteer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Demand characteristics

A

Screw you effect
Social desirability
Guessing the aim of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Reliability

A

Extent to which a measure is consistent.

20
Q

Assessing reliability

A

Inter-observer - the extent to which all observers agree
Test-retest - the extent to which the results can be repeated
Split-half - he extent to which a questionnaire is consistent

21
Q

Improving reliability

A

Standardised instructions
Train observers
Operationalise variables
Controlled conditions

22
Q

Replicability

A

Being able to do a study again with a similar sample, the same methods and procedure, in the same similar setting.

23
Q

Validity

A

Results that are accurate and true. Its to the extent to which something accurately investigates what it intends to

24
Q

Internal validity

A

The extent the study measures what it sets out to measure

25
Q

External validity

A

The extent to which we can generalise our findings accurately

26
Q

Types of External validity

A

Population

Ecological

27
Q

Population validity

A

The extent to which you can accurately generalise findings to other people

28
Q

Ecological validity

A

He extent to which you can accurately generalise findings to real life

29
Q

Types of internal validity

A

Face
Temporal
Concurrent

30
Q

Face validity

A

Extent to which a measure appears on the surface to measure what it is supposed to measure

31
Q

Concurrent validity

A

A way of assessing validity by comparing the results with another relevant measure.

32
Q

Temporal validity

A

The extent to which we can accurately generalise from the results of a study that was conducted several years ago to today.

33
Q

Meta-analysis

A

A way of drawing all the data from studies in a topic area together to make overall conclusions

Uses secondary data

34
Q

Strengths of meta-analysis

A

Large data set - improves power of statistical analysis.
Only best studies included - increases validity.
Differences between findings of different studies can be explored.
Don’t raise ethical problems as no testing.

35
Q

Weaknesses of meta-analysis

A

Bias - what studies to include
Only published studies included - less valid
If studies poor quality - limited value
Only work with quantitative

36
Q

Primary data

A

All data gathered by the researcher deliberately for the purpose of the study

37
Q

Observation

A

Research technique, where behaviour is watcher or recorded either in its natural context or in a laboratory setting

38
Q

Event sampling

A

Where observer counts how often a specific behaviour happens.

39
Q

Observation techniques

A

Naturalistic
Controlled
Covert - participants unaware of observation
Overt
Non-participant - observing not in situation(video link)
Participant

40
Q

Case study

A

In depth studies of an individual or a small group of individuals regarding a topic of interest to the researcher

41
Q

Case study features

A
Interviews with individual
Interviews with family
Observations
Medical notes
Psychological tests
42
Q

Strengths of case studies

A

Vital as rare
Rich in detail
Provide information that could change theories

43
Q

Weaknesses of case studies

A

Difficult to generalise
Single psychologist - bias
Ethical - intrusive?
As so unique its difficult/impossible to replicate (can’t determine reliability)

44
Q

Qualitative data

A

Information collected in non-numerical form.

Descriptions of behaviour, quotes from interview etc

45
Q

Strengths of observational research

A

Obtain true and accurate picture of natural behaviour. Usually high external validity.

May be only practical way of collecting data

46
Q

Weaknesses of observational research

A

Sometimes difficult to operationalise.
Can be time consuming.
Sometimes ethical issues.
Observer bias may influence what is recorded - lower validity.
Naturalistic observations are very hard to replicate as little control over variables -impossible to recreate conditions.

47
Q

Research methods

A

Experimental
Correlational
Case study
Meta-analysis