Research Methods (2) Flashcards
Different experimental designs
Independent groups-different take part in each condition
Repeated Measures-same people used in each condition
Matched pairs-people paired and do different conditions
Independent groups evaluation
- +Order effects not a problem
- +Easy to allocate participants
- -Participant variables
- -More people needed
Repeated measures evaluation
- +Participant variables controlled
- +Fewer people needed
- -Order effects (could use counterbalancing)
- -Demand characteristics
Matched pairs evaluation
- +No order effects or demand characteristics
- +Reduced participant variables
- -Time consuming and expensive
- -Not all particiapant variables controlled
Types of experiments
Lab-high controlled environment
Field-in everyday setting but the IV is changed
Natural-The IV occurs naturally can be conducted in a lab or field
Quasi-IV based on an existing difference between people,no manipulation
Lab experiment Evaluation
- +High control of IV,replicability
- +High internal validity
- -Artifical
- -Demand Characteristics
Field Experiment Evaluation
- +High ecological validity
- -Hard to replicate
- -Low internal validity
- -Unethical,consent and privacy
Natural Experiment Evaluation
- +High ecological validity
- +useful when you can’t change IV
- -Opportunities are rare
Quasi Experiment Evaluation
- +High internal validity
- +Replicability
- -Can’t randomly allocate participants,confounding variables
- -Hard to establish cause and effect with IV manipulation
Sampling Techniques
Random-get list of people and assign number then use generator
Systematic-List of people, sample chosen at every nth term
Stratified-population divided into characteristics and proportions match sample
Opportunity-Use whoever is available
Volunteer-Participants self select themselves
Random sampling Evaluation
- +No researcher bias
- -Time consuming
- -Unrepresentative sample
Systematic sampling Evaluation
- +No researcher bias
- -Not an equal chance of being selected
- -Time consuming
Stratified sampling Evaluation
- +Representative
- -Cant represent everyone
- -Time consuming
Opportunity sampling Evaluation
- +Quick and economical
- -Reasercher bias
- -Not representative
Volunteer sampling Evaluation
- +Less time consuming
- +Participants motivated and engaged
- -Volunteer bias
Ethical Issues
Informed consent
Deception
Right to withdraw
Protection from harm
Confidentiality
Privacy
What is a pilot study?
Small scale version of a study that takes place before a real one
If there are problems, they can be changed before a larger study is done
What is a single blind procedure?
Participants are unaware of which condition they are in, they are mot told the aims of the study until its over
What is a double blind procedure
Neither the participants nor the researcher are aware of the aims
Types of observations
Naturalistic-In the setting the IV would occur
Controlled-In a structured environment
Covert-Participants don’t know about study
Overt-Participants know they’re being observed
Participant-Reseacher is apart of the group they are studying
Non-Participant-Resercher remains separate from Participants
Naturalistic observation Evaluation
- +High external validity
- -Hard to replicate
Controlled observation Evaluation
- +Some variables controlled
- +Easier to replicate
- -Low external validity
Covert Observation Evaluation
- +No demand characteristics
- +Internal validity
- -Ethical issues
Overt observation Evaluation
- +More ethically acceptable
- -Demand characteristics
Participant observation Evaluation
- +More insight into participant experiences
- +internal validity
- -Could get lost on the purpose of the research
Non-Participant Observation Evaluation
- +Maintain psychological distance
- -Lose insight
Observation Designs
Unstructured Observation-Write down everything
Structured-Writing when certain behaviours are observed
Behavioural Categories-Putting target behaviour into measurable categories
Event sampling-Counting how many times a behaviour occurs
Time sampling-Recording target behaviour at fixed intervals
Unstructured Observation Evaluation
- +Produces detailed data
- -Observer bias
- -Qualitative data hard to analyse