Research Methods Flashcards
The Scientific Process:
Define a pilot study and why they are conducted
a small scale trial run of the investigation/experiment.
They are conducted to find out of the study works or not of whether there are any methodological issues which can be addressed before the full study is launched
The Scientific Process:
What are the ethical guidelines determined by the British Psychological Society
Informed consent
Right to withdraw
Deception
Debriefing of Study
Protection from Harm
Confidentiality
Competence
The Scientific Process:
What are the types of sampling techniques
random
opportunity
volunteer
systematic
stratified
The Scientific Process:
Define random sampling and state its advantages and disadvantages
randomly select ppt from the target population and ask if they are willing to take part in the study
A: produces unbiased results
D: requires a list of everyone in the target population and is very time consuming
The Scientific Process:
Define opportunity sampling and state its advantages and disadvantages
also known as convenience sampling. ask people around you
A: save time, effort and money.
D: produces biased results and high rejection rate
The Scientific Process:
Define volunteer sampling and state its advantages and disadvantages
also known as self-selection. use attraction methods to get civilians to sign themselves up to the study
A: less time consuming and low rejection rate
D: only ‘good’ civilians sign up - produces biased results
The Scientific Process:
Define systematic sampling and state its advantages and disadvantages
also known as interval. select every nth person in list
A: not biased
D: time consuming and requires list of everyone in target population
The Scientific Process:
Define stratified sampling and state its advantages and disadvantages
sample population made up of equal proportions to target population
A: fair sample population
D: requires list of everyone in target population and time consuming
The Experimental Method:
Define the two types of hypotheses
Alternate - prediction of what the researchers think the results will be in favour off
Null - opposite of alternate hypothesis. IV does not effect the DV
The Experimental Method:
Define the two types of alternate hypotheses
Non-directional - predicts that there will be a difference but the researchers don’t know in what way the DV will be effected by the IV
Directional - Researchers predict in what way the IV will effect the DV (often only used if there has been previous research)
The Experimental Method:
What factors other than the IV could effect the DV and how
Extraneous - variables which can be controlled by the researchers and are predictable
Participant (internal) - variables due to the participants such as age, gender, social class etc.
Situational (external) - outside factors which could effect the DV such as time of day, light, temperature etc.
Demand Characteristics - when ppts change their behaviour as a result of realising the aim of the study.
Investigator Effects - where the actions of the investigator result in a change in ppt behaviour and alter the results.
The Experimental Method:
What is the difference between reliability and validity
Reliability - how consistent the results of the study are to previous or future studies investigating the same thing
Validity - Does the study investigate what it intends to investigate.
The Experimental Method:
Define the types of reliability
Internal - was the study conducted consistent i.e. standardisation, replicability
External - was the study consistent over time i.e. whether the results of test-retest were the same or not
The Experimental Method:
Define the types of Validity
internal - does the IV effect the DV
external - the task generalisability
ecological - the setting generalisability
temporal - do the results still hold up today
The Experimental Method:
Name the types of experiments
Lab
Field
Natural
Quasi
The Experimental Method:
State the features of a lab experiment
- tightly controlled environments
- experimenter deliberately manipulates the IV across conditions
- experimenter measures the DV
- experimenter controls extraneous variables
- procedure and instructions are standardised
The Experimental Method:
State the features of a field experiment
- conducted in natural environments
- experimenter deliberately manipulates the IV across conditions
- experimenter measures the DV
- experimenter controls some of the extraneous variables
The Experimental Method:
State the features of a natural/quasi experiment
- experimenter has no control over the IV
- experimenter measures the DV
- experimenter has no control over any extraneous variables
The Experimental Method:
Identify the difference between natural and quasi experiments
Natural - only observational of naturally occurring events
Quasi - comparing one group of ppts to another
The Experimental Method:
Name the three types of experimental designs
Independent Measures
Repeated Measures
Matched Pairs
The Experimental Method:
Define Independent Measures Design and state its advantages and disadvantages
Using different participants per condition.
A: Reduces chance of ppts realising what the aim of the study is and either displaying demand characteristics or the screw you effect
D: Guaranteed individual differences
The Experimental Method:
Define Repeated Measures Design and state its advantages and disadvantages
Using the same participants in every condition
A: Eliminates individual differences
D: Creates the order effect and increased possibility of demand characteristics and the screw you effect as a results of participants being more likely to figure out what the aim of the study is
The Experimental Method:
Define Matched Pairs Design and state its advantages and disadvantages
Finding participants who are similar in a relevant variable to create similar proportion groups per condition
A: Reduces risk of individual differences, order effects, demand characteristics and the screw you effect
D: Time consuming and doesn’t fully eliminate individual differences
The Case Study Method:
Define a case study
a natural observation of a single person or small group of people who experienced a singular event resulting in the creation of a new theory to explain any unusual behaviour observed