Research Methods Flashcards
Research Ethics
The moral principles guiding research from its inception through to completion and publication of results
4 principles of BPS
Respect
Competence
Responsibility
Integrity
Respect
inherent worth of all humans should be respected.All worthy of equal moral consideration
Respect for participants privacy
Competence
Working within the recognized limits of your knowledge, skill, training, education and experience
Responsibiltiy
Value responsibility to people, general public as well as profession of science and psychology
Responsibility to avoid harm
Responsibility to not misuse or abuse your contribution to society
Integrity
value honesty, clarity, fairness in all interactions
Informed consent
Participants need to know what theyre signing up for Clear consent from participant that they consent to particpating, after having heard what experiement is after having heard their role in experiment/task and siginifxance of stuy
Right to withdraw
Allowed to withdraw at any point in experiment
Briefing
Time commitment
Aim of project
Risks outlined
Confidentiality and anonymity conditions
Contact details of researcher
Deception
Not telling whole truth to participant when giving briefing in order for participant demand, placebo or any other kind of … to occur.
Inappropriate if it leads to anger or discomfrot in patients
Must be done as soon as study is completed
Debriefing
Full info is communicated
Explain rationale for deception
WW2 experimentation
Eg Josef Mengele: Angel of Death
Experimentation on inmates often resulting in mutilation or death
Nuremburg Code of Ethics (1947): When conducting medical research risks against benefits. Cant torture, cant result in ppls deformit or death
Informed consent
Milgram study (experiement no5)
“Study on Memory”
Standford Prison Experiment (1971)
Cost vs time tradeoff (Online data collection)
Either you will have to spend a lot of money hiring someone who knows the tech, programming etc or spend a lot of time learning and doing this yourself
Challenges: Stimulus presentation and multiple submissions
(Online data collection)
Is the stimulus being presented and viewed in the way you intended/want?
Multiple submissions form participant because of forgetfulness or gained incentives can distort results
Challenges: Data quality
(Online data collection)
Missing values : Researcher must decide whether to keep participants data or leave it depending on how relevant it is to research question –> validty
Outliers:
-Straightlining (giving same response to all questions, take into account completetion time
-Are they real outliers?
Characteristics of Big Data (3Vs)
VOLUME: large data size
VARIETY: Unstructured, different data types
VELOCITY: data generated fast, real time
Dealing with Big Data
1) Extracting data:
Data scraping: extraction of data from web sources and structuring it into a more convenient format.
AND/OR
2) Analysis :
Data mining: analyzing large datasets to uncover trends and valuable insights, no data gathering or extraction.
Data collection: Reactive vs Non-reactive
Reactive: people are aware that they are being studied (study, experiment, interview…)
Non-reactive: People are not aware that they are being studied (observational: on social media, in shopping center…)
Internet-mediated Research (IMR)
Research where researcher is physically absent
Reactive: eg online survey
Non-reactive: eg. app generated data, search engine history, social media posts…
Challenges of Big Data and IMR
Right for privacy:
Where is user expecting to be observed? Privacy setting change? Terms and conditions of platform?
Informed consent and withdrawal:
Deleted post/account count towards research/in data?
Does researcher notice?
Confidentiality and Anonymity: Sensitive topics? Risk of embarassment?
Literature Review vs Systematic Review
Systematic Review: focused on specific research question
Literature Review: broad and descriptive research question
- Plan the review protocol
(Conducting a systematic Review)
-a complete “recipe” of how you will conduct your research so someone else can follow exactly
- Explain and justify each step
- Search the literature
(Conducting a systematic Review)
Define SEARCH TERMS on RELEVANT DATABASES and DATES
So youre choosing time frame
Using key/relevant words
- Screen your search results/findings
(Conducting a systematic Review)
Papers youve found meets inclusion criteria?
Go hrough titles and absteact to decide whethe rto include
You want Randomised controlled trials in your research then kick out the research that doesnt have it. Do this for the resz of your inclusion criteria
- Appraise the quality of studies
(Conducting a systematic Review)
Bias/quality assessment
- Synthesize the evidence
(Conducting a systematic Review)
Write out about bias/quality, results, exclusion etc
Basically everything you did but putting it onto word