research methods Flashcards
define aims
the aims are developed theories of what the experiment is trying to discover
define directional hypothesis
researcher makes it clear the sort of difference expected
define non directional hypothesis
researcher says there is a difference but not type
define independent variable
variables that are changed
define dependent variable
variable that is measured
define extraneous variable
factors other than IV affect the DV
define confounding variables
any variable other than the IV that may affect the DV
define demand characteristics
participant discovers the purpose of experiment and behaviour become unnatural
define randomisation
use of chance to control the effects of bias
define standardisation
using the same formalised procedures for all participants in the study
define investigator effects
investigators behaviour on the effect of the DV
define matched pairs
participants are paired together based on their similarities
pros of matched pairs
less effect of order effects and demand characteristics
less participant variables
cons of matched pairs
time consuming
more expensive
define repeated measures
all participants will experience both conditions one after the other
pros of repeated measures
participant variables are controlled
fewer participants
cons of repeated measures
order effects
demand characteristics
define independent groups
two separate group experience 2 different conditions
pros of independent groups
no order effects
less likely to guess aims
cons of independent groups
participants may have individual differences
define lab experiments
experiments in highly controlled environments
pros of lab experiments
control over extraneous variables
replication is more valid
cons of lab experiments
lack of generalisability
demand characteristics
low mundane realism
define field experiments
a natural everyday setting
pros of field experiments
higher mundane realism
more valid and authentic
cons of field experiments
ethical issues
loss of control over extraneous variables
define natural experiments
researcher takes advantage of pre existing independent variables
pros of natural experiments
provide opportunities for research
high external validity
cons of natural experiments
participants may not be randomly allocated
define systematic sample
every nth number of the population is selected. a sampling frame is produced
pros of systematic sample
avoids researcher bias
cons of systematic sample
unrepresentative
define opportunity sample
select anyone who’s willing and able
pros of opportunity sample
convenient and easy
cons of opportunity sample
unrepresentative , researcher bias
define volunteer sample
participants will select themselves to be part of the sample
pros of volunteer sample
minimum effort, time efficient
cons of volunteer sample
volunteer bias
define random sample
all members of the population have an equal chance of being selected
pros of random sample
free from researcher bias
cons of random sample
difficult to obtain a complete list of the target population
may not be representative
define stratified sample
identify the strata that make up the population - then proportions needed for the sample to be representative is made
pros of stratified sample
avoid researcher bias
representative
cons of stratified sample
can’t reflect all ways people are different
define protection from harm
participants should not be placed under anymore harm than they experience in everyday lives
define confidentiality
have the right to control information about themselves
define informed consent
where people should be aware of the research aims - right to withdraw
define deception
means deliberately withholding information
how to deal with informed consent
issue participants with all relevant information that could affect their decision to participate
how to deal with deception and protection from harm
at the end participants should be given a full debrief
right to withhold data
how to deal with confidentiality
the participants should have anonymity - not recording personal details
define pilot study
a small scale version of an investigation is conducted. the aim is to check that the procedures etc. work effectively and allow for modifications if necessary
define single blind procedure
participant are unaware of the aim but the researcher is aware
define double blind procedure
the participant neither the researcher are aware of the aims
define covert observation
participant behaviour is recorded without their consent or knowledge
cons of covert observation
questionable ethics
pros of covert observation
no problem of participant reactivity
define overt observation
participants are recorded with their consent
pros of overt observation
ethically acceptable
cons of overt observation
demand characteristics
define naturalistic observation
take place in the setting where the behaviour would usually occur
pros of naturalistic observation
high external validity
cons of naturalistic observation
harder to replicate, lack of control over extraneous variables
define controlled observation
watching behaviour within a structured environment
pros of controlled observation
control over most extraneous variables
easier to replicate
cons of controlled observation
may lack external validity
define participant observation
the researcher will become a member of the group whose behaviour is recorded