Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Psychology- Y1 > Research Methods > Flashcards

Research Methods Flashcards

1
Q

Hypothesis

A

A precise testable statement of what the researcher predicts the outcome will be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Independent variable

A

What the researcher changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dependant variable

A

What the researcher measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Alternative hypothesis

A

States there is a relationship between the 2 variables being studied

(Not due to chance + significant in supporting theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Null Hypothesis

A

There is no relationship between the 2 variables being studied

(Results are due to chance + not significant support)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Non directional Hypothesis

A

Two-tailed non-directional hypothesis predicts that the IV will have an effect on DV but direction is not specified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Directional Hypothesis

A

One-tailed directional hypothesis predicts nature of effect of IV on DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How to write hypothesis

A

1) identify key variables
2) operationalise the variables
3) decide on direction of prediction
4) write hypothesis, short w clear and simple language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sampling

A

The process of selecting a representative group from pop under study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Extraneous variables

A

Nuisance variables that do not vary systematically with the IV. A researcher may control some of these

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Confounding variables

A

Change systemically with the IV so we cannot be sure if any observed change in the DV is due to the CV or the IV. CVs must be controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Demand characteristics

A

Any cue from the researcher or research situation that may reveal the aim of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Investigator effects

A

Any effect of the investigator’s behaviour on the outcome of the research (the DV)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Randomisation

A

The use of chance when designing investigations to control for the effects of bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Standardisation

A

Using exactly the same formalised procedures for all participants in a research study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Control groups

A

Used for the purpose of setting a comparison

Act as a ‘baseline’ and help establish causation

17
Q

Single blind

A

Participant doesn’t know the aims of the study so that demand characteristics are reduced

18
Q

Double blind

A

Both researcher and participant don’t know the aims of the study to reduce demand characteristics and investigator effects

19
Q

Independent groups

A
  • One group do condition A and a second group do condition B
  • Participants should be randomly allocated to experimental groups
20
Q

Independent groups ADVANTAGES

A

+No order effects
Ptp only tested once so cant practice or become bored/tired. This controls an important CV

+Will not guess aim
Ptp only tested once so unlikely to guess research aims. Behaviour may be more ‘natural’

21
Q

Independent groups DISADVANTAGES

A

-Participant variables
Ptp in the 2 groups are different, acting as EV/CV. may reduce validity of the study

-More participants
Need twice as many ptp. More time spend recruiting which is expensive

22
Q

Repeated measures

A
  • Same participants take part in all conditions of an experiment
  • The order of the conditions should be counterbalanced to avoid order effects
23
Q

Repeated measures ADVANTAGES

A

+Participants variables
The person in both characteristics has the same characteristics. Controls an important CV

+Fewer participants
Half the number of ptp is needed than in indpendant groups. Less time spent recruiting ptp

24
Q

Repeated measures DISADVANTAGES

A

-Order effects
Ptp may do better or worse when doing a similar task twice. Reduces validity

-Participants may guess aims
Ptp may change their behaviour. May reduce validity

25
Matched pairs
Two groups of participants are used but they are also related to each other by being paired on ptp variables that matter for the experiment
26
Matched pairs ADVANTAGES
+Participant variables Ptp matched on a variable that is variable. Enhances validity +No order effects Ptp only tested once so no practice or fatigue effects. Enhances validity
27
Matched pairs DISADVANTAGES
-Matching pairs is not perfect Matching is time-consuming and can’t control all relevant effects. May not address ptp variables -More participants Need twice as many ptp as repeated measures for same data. More time spent recruiting which is expensive
28
Laboratory experiment
- A controlled environment where extraneous and confounding variables can be regulated - Participants go to researcher - The IV is manipulated and the effect on the DV is recorded
29
Laboratory experiment ADVANTAGES
+EVs and CVs can be controlled This means the effect of EVs and CVs on the DV can be minimised. Cause and effect between the IV and DV can be demonstrated (high internal validity) +Can be easily replicated Due to standardised procedure, experiment can be repeated. If the results are the same this confirms their validity
30
Laboratory experiment DISADVANTAGES
-May lack generalisability The controlled lab environment may be slightly artificial and ptp are ware of being studied. SO behaviour may nt be ‘natural’ and cant be generalised to everyday life (low external validity) -Demand characteristics possibility Cues in the experimental situation that invite a particular response from ptp. Results may be affected by these cues rather than effect of IV
31
Field experiment
- A natural setting - The research we goes to participants - The IV is manipulated and the effect on the DV is recorded
32
Filed experiment ADVANTAGES
+More natural environment Ptp more comfortable in their own environment. Results may be more generalisable to everyday +Participants unaware of being studied They are more likely to behave as they normally do so the findings can be generalised. greater external validity
33
Field experiment DISADVANTAGES
-More difficult to control CVs Observed changes in the DV may not be due to the IV, but to the CVs instead. More difficult to establish to establish cause and effect than in the lab -There ate ethical issues Ptp may not have given informed consent. This is an invasion of privacy, which raises ethical issues
34
Natural experiment
- IV is not manipulated. IV would have varied even if the experimenter wasn’t interested - DV may be naturally occurring (e.g. exam results) or measured by the experimenter
35
Natural experiment ADVANTAGES
+May be only ethical option It may be unethical to manipulate IV, e.g. studying the effects of institutionalisation on children. Natural experiment may be only causal way research that can be done for such topics +Greater external validity Natural experiments involve real-life issues, such as the effect of a natural disaster on stress levels. Findings are more relevant to experiences
36
Natural experiment DISADVANTAGES
-The natural event may only occur rarely Many natural events are ‘one-offs’ which reduces opportunity for research. May limit scope for generalising findings -Participants are not randomly allocated Th experimenter has no control over which ptp are placed in which condition as the IV is pre-existing. May result in CVs that aren’t controlled, e.g. Romanian orphans adopted early may be the friendlier ones
37
Quasi-experiment
- IV is based on a pre-existing difference between people, e.g. age or gender. No one has manipulated this variable, it simply exists - DV may be naturally occurring (e.g. exam results) or may be measured by the experimenter
38
Quasi-experiment ADVANTAGES
+Often high control Often carried out under controlled conditions and therefore shares some of the strengths of lab experiments. Means increased confidence about drawing causal conclusions +Comparisons can be made between people In a quasi-experiment, the IV is a difference between people, e.g. people with and with autism. Means that comparisons between different types of people can be made
39
Quasi-experiment DISADVANTAGES
-Participants are not randomly allocated The experimenter has no control over which ptp are placed in which condition as the IV is pre-existing. Ptp variables may have caused the change i the DV acting as a CV -Causal relationships not demonstrated The researcher does not manipulate/ control the IV. We can’t say for certain that any change in the DV was due to the IV

Psychology- Y1 (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions