Memory Flashcards
Baddeley (1966) Coding in STM and LTM
Acoustically similar words (e.g. cat, cab) or dissimilar (e.g pit, few)
Semantically similar words (e.g. large, big) or dissimilar (e.g good, hot)
Baddeley (1966) Finding + conclusion
Immediate recall worse w acoustically similar words, STM is acoustic
Recall after 20 minutes worse w semantically similar words, LTM is semantic
Jacobs (1887) Capacitu of STM
Digit span: Researcher reads four digits and increases until the ptp cannot recall the order correctly
Jacobs (1887) findings + conclusion
On avg, ptp could repeat back 9.3 numbers and 7.3 letters in correct order immediately after they were presented
Miller (1956) Capacity of STM
Made observations of everyday practice
EX: noted that things come in sevens: 7 notes on musical scale, 7 days of the week, 7 deadly sins, etc
Miller (1956) findings and conclusion
The span of STM is about 7 items (plus or minus 2) but can be improved by chunking- grouping sets of digits/ letters into meaningful units
Peterson and Peterson (1959) Duration of STM
24 students were given a consonant syllable (e.g. YCG) to remember and a 3-digit number to count backwards for 3, 6, 9, 12, or 18 seconds
Peterson and Peterson (1959) findings and conclusion
Students recalled (avg) 80% of the syllables correctly w a 3-second interval
Avg recall after 18 seconds fell to about 3%- suggests that duration of STM w/o rehearsal is about 18-30 seconds
Bahrick et al. (1975) Duration of LTM
Ptp were 392 Americans aged 17-74
- Recognition test: 50 photos from ptp high school yearbook
- Free recall test: ptp listed names of their graduating class
Bahrick et all. (1975) findings and conclusion
Ptp tested 48 years after graduation were about 70% accurate in photo recognition
Free recall was less accurate
A limitation of Baddeley’s study (meaningful information)
Words had no personal meaning to ptp
When processing more meaningful info, semantic may be used even for STM tasks
-limited application
A limitation of Jacobs’ study (time)
Early research lacked control of EVs
EX: some may have been distracted
-lacks validity BUT has other research to support
A limitation of Miller’s study (overestimate)
Research was reviewed
Concluded that capacity of STM was only 4 chunks
-lower end of Miller is more accurate
A limitation of Peterson’s study (artificial stimulus)
Memorising consonant syllables doesn’t reflect real life memory usage where we remember meaningful things
Lacks external validity
-not completely irrelevant bc sometimes remember meaningless things e.g. phone numbers
A straight of Barhrick et al.’s study (external validity)
Real meaningful memories (e.g. names + faces)
When lab studies used meaningless pictures, recall was lower
-CVs of real-life studies not controlled, ptp may haves looked at yearbook over the years