Research Flashcards
Cross-Sectional Study
A study that collects data about a phenomenon during a single point in time or once within a defined time interval
Efficacy vs Effectiveness
Efficacy = the extent to which an intervention produces a desired outcome under ideal conditions
Effectiveness = the extent to which an intervention produces a desired outcome under usual clinical conditions.
For instance, if a treatment is performed for TBI’s in a quiet environment or if performed in a noisier, typical rehab setting. One is focused on efficacy, the other effectiveness.
Experimental vs Non-Experimental Design vs. Quasi-Experimental
Experimental = the behavior of randomly assigned groups is measured after purposeful manipulation of independent variable (cause-effect of independent variable and outcome0
Non-Experimental (Observational) = the groups already exist and the experimenter cannot or does not attempt to manipulate an independent variable. The experimenter is simply comparing the existing groups based on a variable that the researcher did not manipulate. The researcher simply compares what is already established.
Quasi-Experimental = an empirical interventional study used to estimate the causal impact of an intervention on target population without random assignment.
Prospective Study
Research design that follows subjects forward over time
Retrospective Design
Use historical data from sources such as medical records or outcomes database
Single-System Design
Quasi-experimental design in which one subject receives in an alternating fashion both the experimental and control condition
Levels on the continuum of research?
1a. SR of RCT’s
1b. RCT with narrow confidence interval
2a. SR of cohort studies
2b. Individual cohort study
3a. SR of case-control studies
3b. Individual case-control studies
4. Case-series or low-quality case control studies
5. Expert opinion
Best study design for a special test
Cross-sectional non-experimental study of people suspected of having the issue
Cohort Study
Prospective research design. One receives intervention and one doesn’t and monitored over time. Could be labeled quasi or non experimental.
Case-Control Study
Retrospective research design used to evaluate the relationship between risk factor and disease
Basic science vs case report vs expert opinion
Basic science higher than the other 2 (which are on par)
2x2 Contingency table comparing diagnostic test and reference standard
Top Left: True +
Top Right: False +
Bottom Left: False -
Bottom Right: True -
Sensitivity (Def and Calculation)
True positive rate.
Tells us the probability a test is positive in someone we already know has the condition.
A/(A+C)
Very sensitive has relatively few false negative results.
Specificity
True negative rate.
Tells us the probability a test is negative in someone we already know does not have the condition.
D/(D+B)
Highly specific has relatively few false positive results.
Positive predictive value
A/(A+B)
Given a positive test result, the probability that the individual has the condition
Negative Predictive Value
D/(C+D)
Given a negative test result, the probability that the individual does not have the condition
Predictive values versus Sn/Sp
Predictive values seem to work like things work in the clinic: given a test result, what is the probability the result is correct. Sn/Sp work in the opposite direction: given the presence/absence of a condition (based on reference standard), what is the probability of a correct test?
Predictive values are highly dependent on the prevalence of the condition of interest in the sample. Sn and Sp remain fairly consistent across prevalence levels. Positive predictive values will be lower and negative predictive values higher in a sample with low prevalence (vice versa for high prevalence). Prevalence changes drastically depending on the setting where the test is performed.
Likelihood Ratios
Tells us how likely a given test result is in people with with the condition compared with how likely it is in people without the condition.
Quantifies shift in probability once the diagnostic test results are known.
+LR: Sn/(1-Sp)
-LR: (1-Sn)/Sp
LR of 1 indicates the test does nothing to change odds.
Large shift: >10 or <0.1
Moderate shift: 5-10 or 0.1-0.2
Small Shift: 2-5 or 0.2-0.5
High + LR corresponds with high specificity. Low -LR corresponds with low sensitivity.
These are the best stats for clinical practice because they are used to quantify probability revision based on positive or negative test results.
95% Confidence Interval
This is most common and indicates a range of values within which the population value would lie with 95% certainty.
How are pre-test probabilities obtained?
From published data or the clinicians subjective impression/personal experience.