Research Flashcards
What are the guidelines for personality testing of athletes?
- Administered by appropriately qualified psychologists
- Neither too credulous nor too sceptical
- Unethical to use as sole criteria/deciding factor in selection
- Participant to be told purpose of test and given feedback on results
- Assurance of confidentiality
Personality testing of athletes - DO’s?
- Inform participants of purpose and how results will be used
- Only qualified individuals to administer test
- Integrate test results with other info obtained
- Use both state and trait measures
- Provide participants with feedback re results
- Compare individuals against their own baseline levels rather than again normative info [NOTE: TO CHECK WHETHER THIS IS CORRECT. WHAT ABOUT IN DETERMINING STRENGTHS/DEVELOPMENT AREAS AGAINST NORMS?]
Personality testing of athletes - DONT’s?
Do no:
- Use clinical personality tests that focus on abnormality
- Use the test results to decide selection
- Administer or interpret tests unless qualified to do so
- Use to predict behaviour without considering other sources of info e.g observational data and performance assessments
Why shouldn’t psychological test results be used to decide selection?
How can they be used?
Tests are not accurate enough to be predictive
As part of a battery of tests to help in the selection process
What requirements/knowledge is required for use of psychological tests as part of a battery of tests for selection?
- The tests must be a valuable and reliable measure
- The user must know what personality characteristics are key for the sport and the ideal levels of those characteristics needed
- The user should know how much athletes can compensate in some characteristics for the lack of others.
What are the 8 key steps in constructing and administering questionnaires?
- Defining objectives
- Selection of sample size and population
- Writing the questions
- Setting the responses
- Ordering the questions
- Piloting the questionnaire
- Writing the covering letter
- Dealing with non-respondents
5.
What are the problems/characteristics to avoid when writing the questions?
- Ambiguity
- Asking >1 thig in the same question
- Negative questions (confusing and negative sometimes missed)
- Too long
- Leading
2 key tips on ordering of questions?
- Avoid difficult open-ended questions at the start
- Do no scatter questions on the same subject around the questionnaire
What are the typical return rates on questionnaires and to what extent is this improved with a follow up letter?
30-60%
10-25%
What are the pro’s and con’s of open-ended questions?
Pro:
1. Latitude to express opinion
Con:
1. Not liked by respondents
2. Take more time
3. Limited control over response
4. Responses difficult to synthesis/group
Benefits of/issues identified by pilot study?
- Questions answered in the same way by everyone - lack discrimination?
- Unexpected response - poorly wording question?
- Inadequate instructions
- Can the results be analysed in a meaningful way?
- Time taken to complete
- Some questions not answered - poorly written?
What are the questions to continually ask yourself when constructing a questionnaire?
- What specific objective is the question measuring?
- How will the response be analysed?
Points to include in a cover letter?
- Assurance of privacy/anonymity
- Appeal for cooperation - subtle flattery?
- Use person’s name and address rather than generic salutation
- Survey endorsed by recognised agency (association/institution) - use their stationery?
- Offer a summary of the results
- Informed consent required?
- Date for return of questionnaire - enough time but not too long
What are 5 characteristics underlying all scientific research?
- Logical (allows evaluation of conclusion drawn).
- Empirical (based on data rather than theory/logic)
- Replicable
- Reductive (take data from many individuals to generalise to population as a whole) [NOT QUANTITATIVE?]
- Systematic
What are the arguments against quantitative research in particular with respect to human behaviour?
- True objectivity is a myth in science
- Not the only systematic way to study phenomena
- Natural science fails when studying human behaviour
- Science is reductionist (assumes complex behaviour can be broken down into parts and analysed) - too simplistic