Remedies-Compensatory Damages Part 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

2 categories of a recoverable loss.

A
  1. Expectation loss/loss of bargain
  2. Reliance loss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What position do expectation loss damages put the C in?

A

Puts the C in the position they would have been had the contract been performed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What position do reliance loss damages put the C in?

A

Puts the C in the position had the contract never been formed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why are expectation and reliance loss mutually exclusive?

A

To prevent double recovery of damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is restitution?

A

Repayment of any money or other benefits passed to the D in advance of the contract that is breached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

4 ways to assess the awards of damages in contract claims for expectation losses.

A
  1. Difference in value between the goods or services required in the contract and those actually provided.
  2. Where there is a market, damages will be difference between the contract price and the price in the market.
  3. Loss of profit not just for goods but also other contracts.
  4. Loss of a chance (speculative damages)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case for difference in value of goods/services provided and required.

A

Bence Graphics International Ltd v Fasson UK Ltd (1996)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Facts of Bence.

A

D supplied vinyl film on which the C printed identifying markers on bulk containers.
Was an implied term that the decals would but readable for 5 years but were only for 2.
Court awarded damages amounting to loss incurred in replacing the decals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cases for expectation loss decided on the basis of market value.

A

Charter v Sullivan (1957)

W L Thompson Ltd v Robinson Gunmakers Ltd (1955)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Facts of Charter.

A

D contracted to buy a car then refused to take delivery.

Because demand for this particular car outstripped supply, the seller could easily sell the car and make his profit.

Awarded nominal damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Facts of W L Thompson Ltd.

A

D buys a car Vanguard but later refused to accept and pay for it.

Supply of this model exceeded the demand.

Damages awarded for loss of profit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case for loss of profit not just for good but other contract.

A

Victoria Laundry Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (1949)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are reliance loss damages based on?

A

The expense incurred by a C who relied on a contract being performed.
C may also recover expenses he or she has had to spend in advance of a contract that has been breached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case for reliance loss.

A

Anglia Television Ltd v Reed (1972)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Facts of Anglia Television Ltd.

A

Anglia spent money preparing for a film including fees paid to the director, designer and stage manager.
Robert Reed, an American actor, agreed to be the main actor but the pulled out and the film could not be made.
As Anglia could not predict what the profit would have been on the film, the court awarded damages based on reliance loss (i.e. what they had already spent.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case for it sometimes being possible to recover damages for loss of amenity.

A

Farley v Skinner (2001)

17
Q

Facts of Farley.

A

C asked the D, a surveyor, whether the house he was to buy was subject to aircraft noise.
D incorrectly said no.
C awarded £10,000 for the discomfort of suffering aircraft noise.

18
Q

What is mitigation of loss?

A

Where the injured party must take reasonable steps to minimise the effects of the breach.

19
Q

Case for mitigation of loss.

A

British Westinghouse Electric v Underground Electric Railways (1912)

20
Q

Facts of British Westinghouse Electric.

A

Goods were defective so railway company purchased replacements.
Replacements turned out to be more efficient than the original ones.
Not only had they mitigated their losses but they had ended up better off.
Costs of new turbines were not recoverable.

21
Q

In what situation does mitigation of loss not apply?

A

Anticipatory breach where party 1 and 2 continue to act as if the contract will take place.

21
Q

Case for mitigation of loss not applying for anticipatory breach.

A

White and Carter (Councils) Ltd v McGregor (1962)

22
Q

What are liquidated damages?

A

Where a clause has been written into the contract stipulating the amount of damages which will be paid if there is a breach.

23
Q

When will the courts not accept a clause for liquidated damages?

A

If the amount set out is “exorbitant or unconscionable”
(extremely high/unreasonable and unfair/wrong)

24
Q

If the amount for liquidated damages is “exorbitant and unconscionable” what will happen?

A

Will be considered a penalty which is not enforceable in court.

25
Q

In what case was the “exorbitant and unconscionable” test set out?

A

By the Supreme Court in:
Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis (2015)

26
Q

3 common circumstances where damages are awarded on the basis of quantum meruit.

A
  1. In contract for services where no price is stated.
  2. Where the circumstances of the case show that a fresh agreement can be implied in place of the original one.
  3. Where a party has elected to consider the contract discharged by the other’s breach, or where a party has been prevented from performing by the other party.
27
Q

Case for where no price is stated for services.

A

Upton Rural District Council v Powell (1942)

28
Q

Facts of Upton Rural District Council.

A

Employed fireman provided services with no fixed agreement as to wages-the court awarded a reasonable amount

29
Q

Case for where the statement shows a fresh agreement can be implied in place of the original one.

A

Steven v Bromley (1919)

30
Q

Facts of Steven.

A

Steven had agreed to carry steel at a specified rate.
when the steel was delivered it contained extra goods.
Steven was able to claim extra for the additional items.

31
Q

Case for elected discharge of contract due to breach or prevention of full performance.

A

De Barnady v Harding (1853)

32
Q

Facts of De Barnady.

A

Principal (first in importance) revoked his agent’s authority to act on his behalf.
Agent was then entitled to claim for the work he had already done and for expenses incurred.